Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison between Intraoperative and Ultrasound Determined Cesarean Scar Thickness after Elective Cesarean Sections and Unplanned Cesarean Sections in Subsequent Term Pregnancies

View through CrossRef
Background Cesarean section (CS) rates are increasing worldwide. As a result, women presenting with pregnancy with previous CS are also rising. Previous CS is becoming the most common indication for CS, confirming the age old dictum proposed by Edward Craigin in 1914 “Once a cesarean always a cesarean. Aim of the Work Assessment of cesarean scar; as non-healthy or poor-healed scar are associated with some complications such as chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, and abnormal bleeding. Moreover, these poor-healed scars may predispose to preterm labour and uterine dehiscence or rupture in subsequent pregnancy. It was reported also that poor-healed scar may predispose to abnormal placental invasion. Patients and Methods This comparative cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 randomly selected pregnant women attending the outpatient clinic of Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital (ASUMH) in the third trimester at term aged >18 years old with single intrauterine pregnancy, previous one cesarean delivery and not in labor. Pregnant women with abnormal placentation, uterine abnormalities and/or previous uterine surgeries other than one CS delivery were excluded from current study. Results there was no significant difference betweenn two studied groups according to demographic data as age (27.0±3.9 vs. 27.6±3.6, p = 0.382) and BMI (28.2 ± 3.3 vs. 28.7 ± 2.2, p = 0.283). Both groups were comparable with statistically significant difference regarding scar thickness in (ml) and LUS staging. The scar was thicker in elective cases compared with emergency ones (8.4±1.1 vs. 7.7±1.3, p = 0.002), stage I (34 (68.0%) vs. 16 (32.0%)), stage II (15 (30.0%) vs. 25 (50.0%)), stage III (1 (2.0%) vs. 7 (14.0%)) and stage IV (0 (0.0%) vs. 2 (4.0%)). Conclusions From the results of current study we can conclude that, Maternal age and BMI had no effect on cesarean scar quality, integrity and complications incidence. The scar was thicker in elective cases compared with emergency ones.
Title: Comparison between Intraoperative and Ultrasound Determined Cesarean Scar Thickness after Elective Cesarean Sections and Unplanned Cesarean Sections in Subsequent Term Pregnancies
Description:
Background Cesarean section (CS) rates are increasing worldwide.
As a result, women presenting with pregnancy with previous CS are also rising.
Previous CS is becoming the most common indication for CS, confirming the age old dictum proposed by Edward Craigin in 1914 “Once a cesarean always a cesarean.
Aim of the Work Assessment of cesarean scar; as non-healthy or poor-healed scar are associated with some complications such as chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, and abnormal bleeding.
Moreover, these poor-healed scars may predispose to preterm labour and uterine dehiscence or rupture in subsequent pregnancy.
It was reported also that poor-healed scar may predispose to abnormal placental invasion.
Patients and Methods This comparative cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 randomly selected pregnant women attending the outpatient clinic of Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital (ASUMH) in the third trimester at term aged >18 years old with single intrauterine pregnancy, previous one cesarean delivery and not in labor.
Pregnant women with abnormal placentation, uterine abnormalities and/or previous uterine surgeries other than one CS delivery were excluded from current study.
Results there was no significant difference betweenn two studied groups according to demographic data as age (27.
0±3.
9 vs.
27.
6±3.
6, p = 0.
382) and BMI (28.
2 ± 3.
3 vs.
28.
7 ± 2.
2, p = 0.
283).
Both groups were comparable with statistically significant difference regarding scar thickness in (ml) and LUS staging.
The scar was thicker in elective cases compared with emergency ones (8.
4±1.
1 vs.
7.
7±1.
3, p = 0.
002), stage I (34 (68.
0%) vs.
16 (32.
0%)), stage II (15 (30.
0%) vs.
25 (50.
0%)), stage III (1 (2.
0%) vs.
7 (14.
0%)) and stage IV (0 (0.
0%) vs.
2 (4.
0%)).
Conclusions From the results of current study we can conclude that, Maternal age and BMI had no effect on cesarean scar quality, integrity and complications incidence.
The scar was thicker in elective cases compared with emergency ones.

Related Results

Safety of Scar on Repeat Second Cesarean Section in Patients with Previous One Cesarean Section
Safety of Scar on Repeat Second Cesarean Section in Patients with Previous One Cesarean Section
ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the safety and integrity of scar at repeat cesarean section, in patients with previous one cesarean section performed at different settings. Study...
Evaluation of Uterine Scar on Repeat Second Cesarean Section in Patients with Previous Cesarean Section
Evaluation of Uterine Scar on Repeat Second Cesarean Section in Patients with Previous Cesarean Section
To evaluate the safety and integrity of uterine scar at repeat cesarean section in patients with previous one cesarean section (C/S). A prospective study was Carried out in a terti...
Surgical Scar Endometriosis: A Painful Scar
Surgical Scar Endometriosis: A Painful Scar
Introduction: A variant of extrapelvic endometriosis known as "surgical scar endometriosis" is defined by the development of functional endometrial glands and stroma close to the s...
Comparison of Aesthetic Quality of the Final Scar in Abdominoplasty with Conventional and Mini Inverted t-Scar
Comparison of Aesthetic Quality of the Final Scar in Abdominoplasty with Conventional and Mini Inverted t-Scar
Background and objectives: Abdominoplasty is one of the most commonly performed cosmetic procedures. The excess skin in the conventional abdominoplasty is transversely excised and ...
Japan Scar Workshop (JSW) Scar Scale (JSS) for Assessing Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars
Japan Scar Workshop (JSW) Scar Scale (JSS) for Assessing Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars
AbstractThe Vancouver scar scale, the Manchester scar scale, and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) are all very well-known scar evaluation methods. These tools...
Substance Abuse in Teenage Pregnancies – The Current Role of Psycho-Education
Substance Abuse in Teenage Pregnancies – The Current Role of Psycho-Education
Aims: To explore the current availability of psycho-education as a primary prevention against substance misuse in unplanned pregnancies for adolescents in the U...

Back to Top