Javascript must be enabled to continue!
P113 Defining the Safety of Early Ileostomy Closure After IPAA
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis commonly wish to have their ileostomy reversed as quickly as possible. The safety of ileostomy reversal (DLI-R) within 8 weeks of surgery has not been established. Our hypothesis is early closure before 8 weeks is associated with negative outcomes.
Methods
Patients who underwent primary IPAA with DLI from 2000 – 2021 from our Pouch Registry were retrospectively reviewed and stratified into groups based on timing of ileostomy closure: very early, routine (< 8 weeks, 56–116 days, respectively). Reasons for early closure were reported. Our primary outcome was overall complication rates according to timing of closure. Univariate analysis was used to compare categorical variables between groups.
Results
2,000 patients underwent DLI-R following IPAA at a very early or routine timepoint: 3-stage 62%, 2-stage 38%; median age 39.2. DLI-R was performed very early in 92 patients and early routine in 1,908. Median time to closure in the very early group is 49 days and in the early routine group was 93 days. There were no differences between the two groups in age or BMI, but the very early group had a higher proportion of females (62% vs 41.5% p<0.001) and a higher proportion of patients with ASA 1–2 (65.2% vs 51.9% p<0.02). Reasons for DLI-R in the very early group were stoma related problems in 39 patients (43.3%) with scheduled closure in 51 patients (56.7%). Complications following DLI-R occurred in 11.3% of patients overall. The complication rate in the very early group was 17.4% compared to 11% in the routine group (p=0.09) and are shown in Table 1. When the patients in the very early group were stratified according to reason for DLI-R those reversed early for stoma related problems had a complication rate of 25.6% compared to 11% in the early routine group (p=0.03). Patients undergoing scheduled DLI-R in the very early group did not have higher complication rates than the routine group (11.8% vs 11% respectively, p=1.0).
Conclusion
DLI-R at <8 weeks following IPAA does not appear to be associated with a statistically higher rate of complications compared to closure in a standard time frame. However, when patients were reversed early due to complications associated with their stoma they had worse outcomes.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: P113 Defining the Safety of Early Ileostomy Closure After IPAA
Description:
Abstract
Background
Patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis commonly wish to have their ileostomy reversed as quickly as possible.
The safety of ileostomy reversal (DLI-R) within 8 weeks of surgery has not been established.
Our hypothesis is early closure before 8 weeks is associated with negative outcomes.
Methods
Patients who underwent primary IPAA with DLI from 2000 – 2021 from our Pouch Registry were retrospectively reviewed and stratified into groups based on timing of ileostomy closure: very early, routine (< 8 weeks, 56–116 days, respectively).
Reasons for early closure were reported.
Our primary outcome was overall complication rates according to timing of closure.
Univariate analysis was used to compare categorical variables between groups.
Results
2,000 patients underwent DLI-R following IPAA at a very early or routine timepoint: 3-stage 62%, 2-stage 38%; median age 39.
2.
DLI-R was performed very early in 92 patients and early routine in 1,908.
Median time to closure in the very early group is 49 days and in the early routine group was 93 days.
There were no differences between the two groups in age or BMI, but the very early group had a higher proportion of females (62% vs 41.
5% p<0.
001) and a higher proportion of patients with ASA 1–2 (65.
2% vs 51.
9% p<0.
02).
Reasons for DLI-R in the very early group were stoma related problems in 39 patients (43.
3%) with scheduled closure in 51 patients (56.
7%).
Complications following DLI-R occurred in 11.
3% of patients overall.
The complication rate in the very early group was 17.
4% compared to 11% in the routine group (p=0.
09) and are shown in Table 1.
When the patients in the very early group were stratified according to reason for DLI-R those reversed early for stoma related problems had a complication rate of 25.
6% compared to 11% in the early routine group (p=0.
03).
Patients undergoing scheduled DLI-R in the very early group did not have higher complication rates than the routine group (11.
8% vs 11% respectively, p=1.
0).
Conclusion
DLI-R at <8 weeks following IPAA does not appear to be associated with a statistically higher rate of complications compared to closure in a standard time frame.
However, when patients were reversed early due to complications associated with their stoma they had worse outcomes.
Related Results
Problems of ileostomy in necrotizing enterocolitis
Problems of ileostomy in necrotizing enterocolitis
Exteriorization of the intestine and resection of the gangrenous bowel are major therapeutic regimens for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Ileostomy associated complications are we...
<b>The Comparison of Safety Between Early and Late Oral Feeding Following Ileostomy Closure (Reversal) in Relation to Post-Operative Anastomotic Leak</b>
<b>The Comparison of Safety Between Early and Late Oral Feeding Following Ileostomy Closure (Reversal) in Relation to Post-Operative Anastomotic Leak</b>
Background: Ileostomy closure is a common surgical procedure performed to restore intestinal continuity following temporary diversion, yet postoperative management—particularly the...
Is better early closure compared to late closure of temporary ileostomy in rectal cancer? A randomized controlled trial study
Is better early closure compared to late closure of temporary ileostomy in rectal cancer? A randomized controlled trial study
Abstract
Purpose
A temporary loop ileostomy is one of the most common methods for the prevention of anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer patients who underwent low anterio...
Use of cannula ileostomy to protect a low colorectal anastomosis in patients having preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
Use of cannula ileostomy to protect a low colorectal anastomosis in patients having preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
AbstractAimThis study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ileal diversion, using a tracheal cannula, to protect from a low colorectal anastomosis in patients treated with neoadjuv...
Comparison of Wound Infection after Reversal of Loop Ileostomy in Linear versus Purse-String Skin Closure of Stoma Site
Comparison of Wound Infection after Reversal of Loop Ileostomy in Linear versus Purse-String Skin Closure of Stoma Site
Introduction: Loop Ileostomy is a surgical procedure which is done to divert intestinal contents away from distal bowel to allow healing of the distal anastomosis and also for the ...
S‐III‐02
Construction and Management of Loop Ileostomy
S‐III‐02
Construction and Management of Loop Ileostomy
Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the morbidity associated with both construction and reversal of loop ileostomies. Methods: Thirty‐three patients who had loop ileostomie...
Variation in rectoanal inhibitory reflex after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer
Variation in rectoanal inhibitory reflex after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer
AbstractAimThe aim was to evaluate the physiological variation in rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (Lap‐ISR) for ultralow rectal can...
Factors Influencing Patient Safety Management Behaviors in Nursing Students
Factors Influencing Patient Safety Management Behaviors in Nursing Students
The objective of this study is to identify the critical thinking Disposition, problem-solving processes, safety motivation, patient safety management knowledge, attitudes towards p...


