Javascript must be enabled to continue!
S‐III‐02 Construction and Management of Loop Ileostomy
View through CrossRef
Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the morbidity associated with both construction and reversal of loop ileostomies. Methods: Thirty‐three patients who had loop ileostomies constructed and 31 of these same patients who had their loop ileostomies reversed between 1994 and 2001 were reviewed.The loop ileostomies were constructed in round‐shaped (2.5∼3 cm in diameter) like a end ileostomy and everted to produce a 2∼3 cm stoma without a rod Results: The average size of ileostomies was 28 × 29 × 25(hight)mm. Five patients had complications arising from ileostomy construction including 4 parastomal irritation, 1 ileus, and 1 stomal ulcer. All complications improved with conservative management. Mean time to ileostomy reversal was 78 days. Of 31 patients who had loop ileostomies reversed, 10 patients had staple closure (functional end‐to‐end anastomosis with ENDO GIA 45). Nine patients had complications associated with reversal including 6 small bowel obstruction due to anastomotic stenosis(anastomotic edema), 1 leakage and 2 SIRS. Of these 9 patients, 2 required surgical intervention. One patient suffered leakage required reanastomosis, one for SIRS required reconstruction of loop ileostomy. Of 6 patients developed small bowel obstruction, 3 required long intestinal tube decompression. All patients improved with conservative management. 10 patients who had their loop ileostomies closed by functional end‐to‐end anastomosis had no bowel obstruction and other complications. Conclusions: Defunctioning loop ileostomy is associated with low morbidity. We recommend a defunctioning ileostomy as the procedure of choice for temporary fecal diversion, and functional end‐to‐end anastomosis in reversal of ileostomies.
Title: S‐III‐02
Construction and Management of Loop Ileostomy
Description:
Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the morbidity associated with both construction and reversal of loop ileostomies.
Methods: Thirty‐three patients who had loop ileostomies constructed and 31 of these same patients who had their loop ileostomies reversed between 1994 and 2001 were reviewed.
The loop ileostomies were constructed in round‐shaped (2.
5∼3 cm in diameter) like a end ileostomy and everted to produce a 2∼3 cm stoma without a rod Results: The average size of ileostomies was 28 × 29 × 25(hight)mm.
Five patients had complications arising from ileostomy construction including 4 parastomal irritation, 1 ileus, and 1 stomal ulcer.
All complications improved with conservative management.
Mean time to ileostomy reversal was 78 days.
Of 31 patients who had loop ileostomies reversed, 10 patients had staple closure (functional end‐to‐end anastomosis with ENDO GIA 45).
Nine patients had complications associated with reversal including 6 small bowel obstruction due to anastomotic stenosis(anastomotic edema), 1 leakage and 2 SIRS.
Of these 9 patients, 2 required surgical intervention.
One patient suffered leakage required reanastomosis, one for SIRS required reconstruction of loop ileostomy.
Of 6 patients developed small bowel obstruction, 3 required long intestinal tube decompression.
All patients improved with conservative management.
10 patients who had their loop ileostomies closed by functional end‐to‐end anastomosis had no bowel obstruction and other complications.
Conclusions: Defunctioning loop ileostomy is associated with low morbidity.
We recommend a defunctioning ileostomy as the procedure of choice for temporary fecal diversion, and functional end‐to‐end anastomosis in reversal of ileostomies.
Related Results
Loop ileostomy as temporary faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision
Loop ileostomy as temporary faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision
Aim: Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision carries a significant morbidity and mortality. Both loop ileostomy and loop transverse colo...
A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THE OUTCOME OF PRIMARY REPAIR VERSUS LOOP ILEOSTOMY IN ILEAL PERFORATION
A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THE OUTCOME OF PRIMARY REPAIR VERSUS LOOP ILEOSTOMY IN ILEAL PERFORATION
Background: Ileal perforation is a critical surgical emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality if treatment is delayed. Among the management strategies, primary repair...
ILEOSTOMY AND RISK OF ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY IN PATIENTS WITH CROHN'S DISEASE
ILEOSTOMY AND RISK OF ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY IN PATIENTS WITH CROHN'S DISEASE
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Chron's disease is an inflammatory disorder that can involve any part of GI tract but most commonly involves...
Complication Patterns of Loop Ileostomy
Complication Patterns of Loop Ileostomy
Background: Loop ileostomy is a temporary diversion of small intestinal contents towards exterior through anterior abdominal wall. Though it is a good procedure for a better outcom...
REVIEW OF DECOMPRESSION ILEOSTOMY DURING LAPAROSCOPIC RECTAL CANCER SURGERY
REVIEW OF DECOMPRESSION ILEOSTOMY DURING LAPAROSCOPIC RECTAL CANCER SURGERY
Introduction: Decompression ileostomy is always applied to avoid clinically signicant anastomotic leakage and other postoperative complications for patients receiving laparoscopic...
Early vs Delayed Temporal Ileostomy Closure after Low Anterior Resection (LAR) in Patients with Rectal Cancer, A Cohort Study
Early vs Delayed Temporal Ileostomy Closure after Low Anterior Resection (LAR) in Patients with Rectal Cancer, A Cohort Study
Abstract
Background
The optimal timing for ileostomy closure remains controversial, most of the surgeons are closing ileostomy a...
Dietary management for people with an ileostomy: a scoping review
Dietary management for people with an ileostomy: a scoping review
ABSTRACT
Objective:
The objective of this review was to identify and map the evidence for oral dietary management of ileo...
EP.TH.421A Systematic Review of Early versus Late Closure of Loop Ileostomy
EP.TH.421A Systematic Review of Early versus Late Closure of Loop Ileostomy
Abstract
Aim
A Loop ileostomy is one of the most common techniques used in colorectal surgery, in order to protect either a down...

