Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Binaural Hearing of Speech for Aided and Unaided Conditions

View through CrossRef
Differences in speech intelligibility and identification between binaural, monaural near ear, and monaural far ear conditions were studied in sound field conditions. Scores from listeners with normal hearing and with sensorineural losses were evalated in sound field conditions (unaided) and under conditions of hearing aid amplification (aided). For both conditions listeners with sensorineural hearing loss obtained a binaural advantage similar to that found for normal listeners. The binaural advantage could be demonstrated only when the primary and/or competing signal sources were located at an azimuth which resulted in interaural time differences for at least one of the signals. When the signals arrived simultaneously at the ears from the same loudspeaker, no binaural advantage was obtained. Differences in intelligibility and identification scores between monaural near ear and far ear conditions (6.0 dB) were almost twice as large as those found between binaural listening and monaural near ear listening (3.3 dB).
Title: Binaural Hearing of Speech for Aided and Unaided Conditions
Description:
Differences in speech intelligibility and identification between binaural, monaural near ear, and monaural far ear conditions were studied in sound field conditions.
Scores from listeners with normal hearing and with sensorineural losses were evalated in sound field conditions (unaided) and under conditions of hearing aid amplification (aided).
For both conditions listeners with sensorineural hearing loss obtained a binaural advantage similar to that found for normal listeners.
The binaural advantage could be demonstrated only when the primary and/or competing signal sources were located at an azimuth which resulted in interaural time differences for at least one of the signals.
When the signals arrived simultaneously at the ears from the same loudspeaker, no binaural advantage was obtained.
Differences in intelligibility and identification scores between monaural near ear and far ear conditions (6.
0 dB) were almost twice as large as those found between binaural listening and monaural near ear listening (3.
3 dB).

Related Results

Introduction To Hearing And Speech Rehabilitation
Introduction To Hearing And Speech Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation of hearing and speech represents a theory that needs to be confirmed, and also the practice, also a process which is in continuous progress. It is simultaneously a s...
Impaired Binaural Hearing in Adults: A Selected Review of the Literature
Impaired Binaural Hearing in Adults: A Selected Review of the Literature
Despite over 100 years of study, there are still many fundamental questions about binaural hearing that remain unanswered, including how impairments of binaural function are relate...
Gender Effects on Binaural Speech Auditory Brainstem Response
Gender Effects on Binaural Speech Auditory Brainstem Response
BACKGROUND: The speech auditory brainstem response is a tool that provides direct information on how speech sound is temporally and spectrally coded by the auditory brainstem. Spee...
Effect of hearing aids on hearing
Effect of hearing aids on hearing
AbstractWe examined 114 patients aged 10 to 91 years with different kinds of hearing aids fitted in one ear only, the unaided ear acting as a control.They were re‐examined several ...
Pattern of hearing loss among patients visiting ENT OPD at Janaki Medical College: A cross sectional study
Pattern of hearing loss among patients visiting ENT OPD at Janaki Medical College: A cross sectional study
Background and Objectives: To study the pattern of hearing loss among patients visiting ENT OPD in Janaki medical college teaching hospital.Material and Methods: The study was cond...
Hearing Loss in Stroke Cases: A Literature Review
Hearing Loss in Stroke Cases: A Literature Review
Stroke is the most common cause of neurological disability (MacDonald, Cockerell, Sander, & Shorvon, 2000) and about 1 in 3 stroke life survivors are functionally reliant on it...

Back to Top