Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Worse than Philomel, Worse than Actaeon: Hyperreal Ovid in Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus

View through CrossRef
This chapter engages with various postmodern theories of adaptation (Douglas Lanier’s Shakespearean Rhizomatics in particular) in order to explore how Shakespeare reshaped his source material from Ovid’s Metamorphoses to construct the horrific body trauma of Titus Andronicus . Shifting the typical focus of adaptation theory from recent adaptations of “Shakespeare” to Shakespeare’s own adaptation of Ovid, this essay examines specific moments from both Titus Andronicus and the tales of Philomela and Actaeon in the Metamorphoses —especially in connection to the performance of the “unspeakable,” the “obscene,” and the “irreligious”—in order to better understand the early modern play, the classical poem, and the very act of adaptation itself.
Title: Worse than Philomel, Worse than Actaeon: Hyperreal Ovid in Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus
Description:
This chapter engages with various postmodern theories of adaptation (Douglas Lanier’s Shakespearean Rhizomatics in particular) in order to explore how Shakespeare reshaped his source material from Ovid’s Metamorphoses to construct the horrific body trauma of Titus Andronicus .
Shifting the typical focus of adaptation theory from recent adaptations of “Shakespeare” to Shakespeare’s own adaptation of Ovid, this essay examines specific moments from both Titus Andronicus and the tales of Philomela and Actaeon in the Metamorphoses —especially in connection to the performance of the “unspeakable,” the “obscene,” and the “irreligious”—in order to better understand the early modern play, the classical poem, and the very act of adaptation itself.

Related Results

Lavinia is Philomel
Lavinia is Philomel
In what way might a poem or a narrative serve not as a representation but instead as a nonhuman agent? From one perspective, Shakespeare’s Titus...
Going Roman: Richard III and Titus Andronicus compared
Going Roman: Richard III and Titus Andronicus compared
This chapter provides a comparison of Richard III and Titus Andronicus. Both Titus and Richard III have at their centre an elaborated picture of tyranny. While Titus comes off as a...
Remnants of Virgil, Ovid, and Paul in Titus Andronicus
Remnants of Virgil, Ovid, and Paul in Titus Andronicus
Employing Linda Hutcheon’s analogy between biological and cultural adaptation, this chapter analyzes how the survivors of the Roman-Gothic war in Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus ada...
Les adaptations textuelles et scéniques de Shakespeare en Inde coloniale (1852-1932) : enjeux et processus
Les adaptations textuelles et scéniques de Shakespeare en Inde coloniale (1852-1932) : enjeux et processus
La présente thèse de doctorat étudie les premières adaptations indiennes du théâtre de Shakespeare dont la création remonte à l'époque coloniale. La période choisie pour la thèse v...
Digital Humanities’ Shakespeare Problem
Digital Humanities’ Shakespeare Problem
Digital humanities has a Shakespeare problem; or, to frame it more broadly, a canon problem. This essay begins by demonstrating why we need to consider Shakespeare’s position in th...
Exploring Gender Relations via Shakespeare: Students’ perspectives on Shakespeare’s life
Exploring Gender Relations via Shakespeare: Students’ perspectives on Shakespeare’s life
In this article, we discuss the application of feminist theory and criticism in the teaching of Shakespeare in higher education institutions and consider biographical approaches to...
Jonson vs. Shakespeare: The Roman Plays
Jonson vs. Shakespeare: The Roman Plays
Critics rarely bring Ben Jonson's two Roman tragedies – Sejanus and Catiline – into proximity with Shakespeare's four Roman tragedies – Titus Andronicus, Julius Caesar, Antony and ...

Back to Top