Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

COMPARISON OF ALVARADO SCORE AND RIPASA SCORE IN THE ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS IN COMBINED MILITARY HOSPITAL RAWALPINDI

View through CrossRef
Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of Alvarado score and the RIPASA score for acute appendicitis using histopathology as a gold standard. Study Design: Cross sectional validation study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of General Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Mar to Sep 2018. Methodology: A total number of 270 patients were included in the study presenting with pain right iliac fossa to the Accident and Emergency department. Surgeons and Seniors Residents in Surgery on call in the Accident and Emergency Department. Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, scored the patients with suspicion of acute appendicitis with Alvarado Score and RIPASA score simultaneously. After appendectomy of these patients, the removed appendix was sent for histopathology to confirm whether it was normal or inflamed. A 2x2 table was used for calculating sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of the RIPASA score and Alvarado Score. The two scoring systems were then compared for diagnostic accuracy. Results: In our study, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of RIPASA score and Alvarado score for diagnosing acute appendicitis were 92.1%, 62.1%, 95.2%, 48.6%, 88.9% and 72.6%, 68.9%, 95.1%, 23.2%, 72.2% respectively. Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of RIPASA score was more than that of Alvarado score in diagnosing acute appendicitis.
Title: COMPARISON OF ALVARADO SCORE AND RIPASA SCORE IN THE ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS IN COMBINED MILITARY HOSPITAL RAWALPINDI
Description:
Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of Alvarado score and the RIPASA score for acute appendicitis using histopathology as a gold standard.
Study Design: Cross sectional validation study.
Place and Duration of Study: Department of General Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Mar to Sep 2018.
Methodology: A total number of 270 patients were included in the study presenting with pain right iliac fossa to the Accident and Emergency department.
Surgeons and Seniors Residents in Surgery on call in the Accident and Emergency Department.
Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, scored the patients with suspicion of acute appendicitis with Alvarado Score and RIPASA score simultaneously.
After appendectomy of these patients, the removed appendix was sent for histopathology to confirm whether it was normal or inflamed.
A 2x2 table was used for calculating sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of the RIPASA score and Alvarado Score.
The two scoring systems were then compared for diagnostic accuracy.
Results: In our study, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of RIPASA score and Alvarado score for diagnosing acute appendicitis were 92.
1%, 62.
1%, 95.
2%, 48.
6%, 88.
9% and 72.
6%, 68.
9%, 95.
1%, 23.
2%, 72.
2% respectively.
Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of RIPASA score was more than that of Alvarado score in diagnosing acute appendicitis.

Related Results

Alvarado versus Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis Scores for Diagnosis Acute Appendicitis in Children
Alvarado versus Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis Scores for Diagnosis Acute Appendicitis in Children
Objective Although acute appendicitis is the most common emergency surgical pathology it is not easy to diagnose in pediatric patients. This study aims to compare the accuracy of R...
COMPARISON OF ALVARADO SCORE AND RIPASA SCORE IN DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS AT HJ. BUNDA HALIMAH HOSPITAL BATAM
COMPARISON OF ALVARADO SCORE AND RIPASA SCORE IN DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS AT HJ. BUNDA HALIMAH HOSPITAL BATAM
ABSTRACT Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common abdominal surgical emergency, requiring rapid and accurate diagnosis to prevent serious complications. The Alvarado and ...
Evaluating the Diagnostic Efficacy of RIPASA vs. Alvarado Scores in Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective Comparative Analysis
Evaluating the Diagnostic Efficacy of RIPASA vs. Alvarado Scores in Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective Comparative Analysis
Background: Appendicitis is the third most common cause of emergency abdominal surgery worldwide, but diagnosis remains challenging. Clinical scoring systems like Alvarado and RIPA...
Comparative diagnostic accuracy of RIPASA and Alvarado scores for acute appendicitis
Comparative diagnostic accuracy of RIPASA and Alvarado scores for acute appendicitis
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) and Alvarado scoring systems in patients with suspected acute appendicitis using hi...
COMPARISON BETWEEN MODIFIED ALVARADO AND RIPASA SCORING SYSTEM IN DIAGNOSING ACUTE APPENDICITIS
COMPARISON BETWEEN MODIFIED ALVARADO AND RIPASA SCORING SYSTEM IN DIAGNOSING ACUTE APPENDICITIS
Background: The most frequent emergency surgery is an emergency appendectomy, which is one of the most prevalent causes of acute abdominal pain. A clinical scoring system is the le...
The RIPASA score in comparison to the ALVARADO score for diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
The RIPASA score in comparison to the ALVARADO score for diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
Objective: To compare the efficacy of RIPASA score with Alvarado Score in terms of diagnosing acute appendicitis. Study Design: Comparative study. Setting: Surgical Unit V, Faisala...
Comparison of the reliability of scoring systems in the light of histopathological results in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis
Comparison of the reliability of scoring systems in the light of histopathological results in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis
Background:Acute appendicitis is a very common surgical emergency. Early and correct diagnosis and early intervention are necessary to prevent complications. It is often diagnosed ...

Back to Top