Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparison of the reliability of scoring systems in the light of histopathological results in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis
View through CrossRef
Background:Acute appendicitis is a very common surgical emergency. Early and correct diagnosis and early intervention are necessary to prevent complications. It is often diagnosed on clinical signs and a certain ratio of negative appendectomy is acceptable. For early and accurate diagnosis, various scoring systems such as Alvarado, Ohmann, Eskelinen and more recently Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) have been developed.Objective:In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness and accuracy of scoring systems.Materials and methods:The patients who attended emergency department and operated with acute appendicitis pre-diagnosis were evaluated retrospectively. Alvarado, Ohmann, Eskelinen, and RIPASA scores were calculated and compared with histopathologic results by reviewing the patient files.Results:A total of 76 patients (44 males and 32 females) were included in the study. The mean age was 33.8 ± 13.2 years. Of which, 59 patients (77.6%) were diagnosed to have acute appendicitis on histopathological examination. The mean leukocyte count was 13.9 ± 3.7 × 103μL. Sensitivity and specificity of Alvarado, Ohmann, Eskelinen, and RIPASA were 36%–82%; 58%–71%; 36%–8%, and 68%–71%, respectively. Cut-off values were 8, 14, 55.63, and 10, respectively. RIPASA had the highest accuracy. The cut-off value of leukocyte counts was 13,900 × 103/μL. Sensitivity and specificity were 64% and 88%, respectively; positive predictive value was 95%. In the receiver operating curve analysis, the area under the curve was found to be 74%.Conclusion:The RIPASA scoring system is a more reliable scoring system than Ohmann, Eskelinen, and Alvarado scoring systems. In cases of suspected acute appendicitis, it may be useful to evaluate patients with RIPASA score in emergency departments by general practitioners, where there is no general surgeon. Thus, patients can be guided in a timely manner to reduce the complications that may arise from delays. The cut-off value of 13,900 × 103/μL is an important marker for the presence of acute appendicitis.
Title: Comparison of the reliability of scoring systems in the light of histopathological results in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis
Description:
Background:Acute appendicitis is a very common surgical emergency.
Early and correct diagnosis and early intervention are necessary to prevent complications.
It is often diagnosed on clinical signs and a certain ratio of negative appendectomy is acceptable.
For early and accurate diagnosis, various scoring systems such as Alvarado, Ohmann, Eskelinen and more recently Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) have been developed.
Objective:In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness and accuracy of scoring systems.
Materials and methods:The patients who attended emergency department and operated with acute appendicitis pre-diagnosis were evaluated retrospectively.
Alvarado, Ohmann, Eskelinen, and RIPASA scores were calculated and compared with histopathologic results by reviewing the patient files.
Results:A total of 76 patients (44 males and 32 females) were included in the study.
The mean age was 33.
8 ± 13.
2 years.
Of which, 59 patients (77.
6%) were diagnosed to have acute appendicitis on histopathological examination.
The mean leukocyte count was 13.
9 ± 3.
7 × 103μL.
Sensitivity and specificity of Alvarado, Ohmann, Eskelinen, and RIPASA were 36%–82%; 58%–71%; 36%–8%, and 68%–71%, respectively.
Cut-off values were 8, 14, 55.
63, and 10, respectively.
RIPASA had the highest accuracy.
The cut-off value of leukocyte counts was 13,900 × 103/μL.
Sensitivity and specificity were 64% and 88%, respectively; positive predictive value was 95%.
In the receiver operating curve analysis, the area under the curve was found to be 74%.
Conclusion:The RIPASA scoring system is a more reliable scoring system than Ohmann, Eskelinen, and Alvarado scoring systems.
In cases of suspected acute appendicitis, it may be useful to evaluate patients with RIPASA score in emergency departments by general practitioners, where there is no general surgeon.
Thus, patients can be guided in a timely manner to reduce the complications that may arise from delays.
The cut-off value of 13,900 × 103/μL is an important marker for the presence of acute appendicitis.
Related Results
HYPERBILIRUBINEMIA AS AN INDICATOR IN PERFORATED APPENDICITIS
HYPERBILIRUBINEMIA AS AN INDICATOR IN PERFORATED APPENDICITIS
Introduction: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of urgent admission to the hospital.In appendicitis, elevated intra-luminal
pressure and ischemic necrosis of muco...
Evaluation and Comparison of the Accuracy and Efficacy of Alvarado and Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Scoring in Acute Appendicitis
Evaluation and Comparison of the Accuracy and Efficacy of Alvarado and Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Scoring in Acute Appendicitis
INTRODUCTION
Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. Early surgery for acute appendicitis may lead to inadequate evaluation of diffe...
Comparison of the appendicitis inflammatory response and Alvarado scoring systems in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children
Comparison of the appendicitis inflammatory response and Alvarado scoring systems in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children
Our objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Alvarado and appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) scoring systems among children suspected of acute appendicitis concern...
Enterobius Vermicularis Unusual Cause of Appendicitis: A Case Report
Enterobius Vermicularis Unusual Cause of Appendicitis: A Case Report
Abdominal pain is common in children (under 18 years) with a strong female preponderance in those aged over 8 years. Of those presenting with acute abdominal pain requiring inpatie...
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Abstract
Introduction
The exact manner in which large language models (LLMs) will be integrated into pathology is not yet fully comprehended. This study examines the accuracy, bene...
Evaluation of Serum Bilirubin as a Predictive Marker for Simple and Complicated Appendicitis in Sulaimani Emergency Teaching Hospital
Evaluation of Serum Bilirubin as a Predictive Marker for Simple and Complicated Appendicitis in Sulaimani Emergency Teaching Hospital
Diagnosis of acute appendicitis can be challenging in some cases as the differentials can be exhaustive. Previous studies have demonstrated that hyperbilirubinemia is a more specif...
Acute Appendicitis: A prospective study comparing clinical appendicitis with histopathological appendicitis.
Acute Appendicitis: A prospective study comparing clinical appendicitis with histopathological appendicitis.
Objective: To compare clinical appendicitis with histopathological appendicitis. Study Design: Prospective Cross-sectional study. Setting: Department of Surgery, Lady Reading Hospi...
Hydronephrosis as a predictor of complicated acute appendicitis: a cross-sectional study
Hydronephrosis as a predictor of complicated acute appendicitis: a cross-sectional study
Objective. To determine whether hydronephrosis is a predictive factor for complicated acute appendicitis in patients with acute appendicitis. Material and methods. Observational, a...

