Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Appropriate Use of Anticoagulants among Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients at a University Hospital in Thailand

View through CrossRef
OBJECTIVE: Warfarin is primarily used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients in Thailand. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are used less commonly due to their high cost. This study aimed to evaluate the appropriate use of anticoagulants and clinical outcomes among nonvalvular AF (NVAF) patients. METHODS: This retrospective study collected data from the electronic medical records of patients who were diagnosed with NVAF between January 2014 and December 2019 at the Faculty of Medicine, Vajira Hospital. Baseline characteristics, prescribed indication, types and doses of anticoagulant, and ischemic and hemorrhagic outcomes were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: We analyzed 783 patients with NVAF in this study. Of these, 539 (68.90%) were treated with oral anticoagulants (OAC), including 344 patients (43.90%) with warfarin therapy and 195 (24.90%) with NOACs. Meanwhile, 492 (73.10%) patients with CHA2DS2VASC score ≥ 2 received OAC therapy that was suitable for their indication. Of the 344 patients who received warfarin, 112 patients (32.60%) had an optimal time in therapeutic range (TTR) level of ≥ 65%. Of the 195 NOAC patients, only 98 (50.30%) received appropriate doses of NOACs. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall incidence rates of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, bleeding, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death between the warfarin and NOACS groups. Appropriate TTR levels in the warfarin group was associated with significantly lower incidence rates of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.02–0.79; p = 0.02) and all-cause death (hazard ratio: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.12–0.87; p = 0.01), than inappropriate TTR levels. CONCLUSION: Most NVAF patients received oral anticoagulants with the appropriate indication. Warfarin is the most prescribed oral anticoagulant for patients with NVAF. About half of the patients received inappropriate doses of oral anticoagulants that potentially adversely affected the study outcomes of cardiovascular and all-cause deaths.
Title: Appropriate Use of Anticoagulants among Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients at a University Hospital in Thailand
Description:
OBJECTIVE: Warfarin is primarily used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients in Thailand.
Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are used less commonly due to their high cost.
This study aimed to evaluate the appropriate use of anticoagulants and clinical outcomes among nonvalvular AF (NVAF) patients.
METHODS: This retrospective study collected data from the electronic medical records of patients who were diagnosed with NVAF between January 2014 and December 2019 at the Faculty of Medicine, Vajira Hospital.
Baseline characteristics, prescribed indication, types and doses of anticoagulant, and ischemic and hemorrhagic outcomes were recorded and analyzed.
RESULTS: We analyzed 783 patients with NVAF in this study.
Of these, 539 (68.
90%) were treated with oral anticoagulants (OAC), including 344 patients (43.
90%) with warfarin therapy and 195 (24.
90%) with NOACs.
Meanwhile, 492 (73.
10%) patients with CHA2DS2VASC score ≥ 2 received OAC therapy that was suitable for their indication.
Of the 344 patients who received warfarin, 112 patients (32.
60%) had an optimal time in therapeutic range (TTR) level of ≥ 65%.
Of the 195 NOAC patients, only 98 (50.
30%) received appropriate doses of NOACs.
There was no statistically significant difference in the overall incidence rates of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, bleeding, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death between the warfarin and NOACS groups.
Appropriate TTR levels in the warfarin group was associated with significantly lower incidence rates of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio: 0.
14; 95% CI: 0.
02–0.
79; p = 0.
02) and all-cause death (hazard ratio: 0.
36; 95% CI: 0.
12–0.
87; p = 0.
01), than inappropriate TTR levels.
CONCLUSION: Most NVAF patients received oral anticoagulants with the appropriate indication.
Warfarin is the most prescribed oral anticoagulant for patients with NVAF.
About half of the patients received inappropriate doses of oral anticoagulants that potentially adversely affected the study outcomes of cardiovascular and all-cause deaths.

Related Results

Adiponectin and Lone atrial fibrillation
Adiponectin and Lone atrial fibrillation
Objective: Lone atrial fibrillation is an idiopathic arrhythmia seen in younger individuals without any secondary disease. Adiponectin is an endogenous adipocytokine that increases...
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION CARDIOVERSION AND F
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION CARDIOVERSION AND F
Objectives To investigate the relationship between atrial fibrillation cardioversion and f wave in electrocardiogram, providing an ordinary and noninvasive method...
Atrial fibrillation increased in-hospital and 4-year all-cause mortality in Critically ill patients with liver cirrhosis
Atrial fibrillation increased in-hospital and 4-year all-cause mortality in Critically ill patients with liver cirrhosis
Abstract ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to use a large database that contains information on patient intensive care unit (ICU) admissions to study critically ill pa...
Diagnostic accuracy of an oscillometric blood pressure monitor for atrial fibrillation screening
Diagnostic accuracy of an oscillometric blood pressure monitor for atrial fibrillation screening
Objective Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia of clinical significance and hypertension is one of its major risk factors. This study aimed to evaluate the...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract Introduction Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...

Back to Top