Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Prophylactic efficacy of intravenous atropine with crystalloid co-loading for hemodynamic stability in parturient undergoing cesarean delivery at Dilla University Referral Hospital. A randomized controlled trial
View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT
Background:
The main objective of this study is to assess the prophylactic efficacy of intravenous atropine for the prevention of hypotension after spinal anesthesia in a parturient who underwent cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.
Method:
A randomized controlled trial study was conducted at Dilla University hospital. Pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean section were randomized to either atropine prophylaxis (n = 33) or active prophylaxis (n = 33) for prevention of post-spinal hypotension. Sample sizes were calculated using a G-power version 3.1.9.2 getting a total of 66 participants. Intraoperative blood pressure, heart rate, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting were assessed. Paired sample t-test was used to compare each group change from baseline. Independent t-test and Manny Whitney tests were used based on the distribution of data. A statistically significant difference was determined at a p-value of ≤05.
Result:
Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure declined from the baseline in both groups after spinal anesthesia. Atropine didn't prevent a decline in blood pressure from the baseline during the first 60 min of initiation of spinal anesthesia (p > 0.05). Heart rates at the 15th and 20th minute were higher in the atropine group (p < 0.05). There is no statistically significant difference between groups regarding mean Apgar score, and neonatal outcome. The total crystalloid fluid given during the perioperative period is higher in the active prophylaxis group with a mean of 2151.5 ml compared to 1651.52 ml in the atropine group p = 0.002. The incidence of intraoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in the active prophylaxis group compared to the atropine group but the difference is not statistically significant p > 0.05 as it was shown in the figure below.
Conclusion:
Prophylactic administration of atropine didn't prevent a decline in blood pressure from baseline. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was lower in the atropine group with no statistically significant difference.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Prophylactic efficacy of intravenous atropine with crystalloid co-loading for hemodynamic stability in parturient undergoing cesarean delivery at Dilla University Referral Hospital. A randomized controlled trial
Description:
ABSTRACT
Background:
The main objective of this study is to assess the prophylactic efficacy of intravenous atropine for the prevention of hypotension after spinal anesthesia in a parturient who underwent cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.
Method:
A randomized controlled trial study was conducted at Dilla University hospital.
Pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean section were randomized to either atropine prophylaxis (n = 33) or active prophylaxis (n = 33) for prevention of post-spinal hypotension.
Sample sizes were calculated using a G-power version 3.
1.
9.
2 getting a total of 66 participants.
Intraoperative blood pressure, heart rate, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting were assessed.
Paired sample t-test was used to compare each group change from baseline.
Independent t-test and Manny Whitney tests were used based on the distribution of data.
A statistically significant difference was determined at a p-value of ≤05.
Result:
Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure declined from the baseline in both groups after spinal anesthesia.
Atropine didn't prevent a decline in blood pressure from the baseline during the first 60 min of initiation of spinal anesthesia (p > 0.
05).
Heart rates at the 15th and 20th minute were higher in the atropine group (p < 0.
05).
There is no statistically significant difference between groups regarding mean Apgar score, and neonatal outcome.
The total crystalloid fluid given during the perioperative period is higher in the active prophylaxis group with a mean of 2151.
5 ml compared to 1651.
52 ml in the atropine group p = 0.
002.
The incidence of intraoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in the active prophylaxis group compared to the atropine group but the difference is not statistically significant p > 0.
05 as it was shown in the figure below.
Conclusion:
Prophylactic administration of atropine didn't prevent a decline in blood pressure from baseline.
The incidence of nausea and vomiting was lower in the atropine group with no statistically significant difference.
Related Results
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract
Introduction
Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Comparison of Efficacy of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Versus Intravenous Lidocaine for Attenuation of Stress Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia for Elective Surgeries
Comparison of Efficacy of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Versus Intravenous Lidocaine for Attenuation of Stress Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia for Elective Surgeries
Harfaoui W, Alilou M, El Adib AR, Zidouh S, Zentar A, Lekehal B, et al. Patient Safety in Anesthesiology: Progress, Challenges, and Prospects. Cureus. 2024 Sep; 16(9). doi: 10.7759...
SISTEM RUJUKAN DALAM SISTEM PELAYANAN KESEHATAN MATERNAL PERINATAL DI INDONESIA
SISTEM RUJUKAN DALAM SISTEM PELAYANAN KESEHATAN MATERNAL PERINATAL DI INDONESIA
ABSTRAK
Kasus keterlambatan rujukan merupakan salah satu permasalahan utama terjadinya kematian ibu dan bayi di Indonesia. Kematian ibu dan bayi dapat diakibatkan pelayanan d...
Comparison of Ephedrine Versus Crystalloid Preload in Prevention of Hypotension after Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section
Comparison of Ephedrine Versus Crystalloid Preload in Prevention of Hypotension after Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section
Background: Spinal anesthesia is commonly used for cesarean delivery because it is simple, quick, and safe for both the mother and fetus compared with other methods like general an...
Predictors of success of trial of labor after cesarean section: A nested case–control study at public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia
Predictors of success of trial of labor after cesarean section: A nested case–control study at public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia
Background:
One of the primary reasons for an increase in cesarean sections is obstetricians’ uncertainty about labor trial safety following a previous cesarean...
Myocardial β-Blockade as an Alternative to Cardioplegic Arrest during Coronary Artery Surgery
Myocardial β-Blockade as an Alternative to Cardioplegic Arrest during Coronary Artery Surgery
The authors' recent experimental work has demonstrated that myocardial protection using continuous coronary perfusion with warm β-blocker-enriched blood avoids myocardial ischaemia...
Intrapartum influences on cesarean delivery in multiple gestation
Intrapartum influences on cesarean delivery in multiple gestation
Objective. To evaluate which intrapartum factors influence the method of delivery in a group of twin pregnancies eligible for vaginal delivery.Study design. Over a 10‐year period, ...
Evaluating the Role of Intrathecal Fentanyl in Reducing Post-Dural Puncture Headache Among Parturient Undergoing Cesarean
Evaluating the Role of Intrathecal Fentanyl in Reducing Post-Dural Puncture Headache Among Parturient Undergoing Cesarean
Background: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a frequent and distressing complication of spinal anesthesia in parturient patients undergoing cesarean section, causing discomfo...

