Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES FOLLOWING SYNDESMOTIC SCREW FIXATION- A COMPARISON OF SCREW REMOVAL VERSUS RETENTION.

View through CrossRef
BACKGROUND: - The incidence of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injury in ankle fractures is about 13%. The integrity of syndesmosis is a critical factor which stabilizes ankle mortise during weight-bearing besides load transmission. The primary purpose of the study was to assess the functional outcome in patients with Weber B and C fractures and to decide whether the syndesmotic screws are to be removed or not before weight-bearing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: - This was a prospective observational study involving patients (>18 years of age) who had undergone open reduction and internal fixation of an ankle fracture belonging to Weber B or C classification who had screw stabilization of a disrupted syndesmosis. The study period was three years commencing from August 2014. They were divided into two groups based on the syndesmotic screw retention or removal before weight-bearing. The patients were then regularly followed up with American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle/hindfoot score and Visual Analogue Score-Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA) score were used to assess the functional outcome. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were done with each follow-up at 4,6,9,12 months. RESULTS: - We identified 32 fractures in 32 patients. Treatment undertaken was open reduction and internal fixation for the malleolli and syndesmotic screw fixation in all patients, and syndesmotic screws were removed in 17 and retained in 15. None of the patients were managed conservatively. We lost a patient to long-term follow-up. The AOFAS score was seen to be progressively increasing (92.3 – 96.75) and higher in the removed group as compared to retained. The VAS-FA score was also seen to be increasing besides being higher in the removed group (160.17 to 187). None of the patients failed the operative stabilization. Also, none of the patients had long-term complications like non-union, mal-union or screw back out excepting one patient who had persistent pain in the retained group. CONCLUSION: It is safe and better to remove the syndesmotic screw prior to weight bearing, when compared to retaining them insitu. Level of evidence IV-prognostic
Title: FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES FOLLOWING SYNDESMOTIC SCREW FIXATION- A COMPARISON OF SCREW REMOVAL VERSUS RETENTION.
Description:
BACKGROUND: - The incidence of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injury in ankle fractures is about 13%.
The integrity of syndesmosis is a critical factor which stabilizes ankle mortise during weight-bearing besides load transmission.
The primary purpose of the study was to assess the functional outcome in patients with Weber B and C fractures and to decide whether the syndesmotic screws are to be removed or not before weight-bearing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: - This was a prospective observational study involving patients (>18 years of age) who had undergone open reduction and internal fixation of an ankle fracture belonging to Weber B or C classification who had screw stabilization of a disrupted syndesmosis.
The study period was three years commencing from August 2014.
They were divided into two groups based on the syndesmotic screw retention or removal before weight-bearing.
The patients were then regularly followed up with American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle/hindfoot score and Visual Analogue Score-Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA) score were used to assess the functional outcome.
Clinical and radiographic evaluations were done with each follow-up at 4,6,9,12 months.
RESULTS: - We identified 32 fractures in 32 patients.
Treatment undertaken was open reduction and internal fixation for the malleolli and syndesmotic screw fixation in all patients, and syndesmotic screws were removed in 17 and retained in 15.
None of the patients were managed conservatively.
We lost a patient to long-term follow-up.
The AOFAS score was seen to be progressively increasing (92.
3 – 96.
75) and higher in the removed group as compared to retained.
The VAS-FA score was also seen to be increasing besides being higher in the removed group (160.
17 to 187).
None of the patients failed the operative stabilization.
Also, none of the patients had long-term complications like non-union, mal-union or screw back out excepting one patient who had persistent pain in the retained group.
CONCLUSION: It is safe and better to remove the syndesmotic screw prior to weight bearing, when compared to retaining them insitu.
Level of evidence IV-prognostic.

Related Results

Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct Introduction Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Revision Ankle Syndesmosis Fixation: Functional Outcome after TightRope® Fixation
Revision Ankle Syndesmosis Fixation: Functional Outcome after TightRope® Fixation
ABSTRACT Introduction Syndesmotic injuries present a challenge to orthopedic surgeons. Malreduction of the syndesmosis has been reported to cause instability and secondary osteoar...
Lisfranc open reduction and internal fixation in an athletic population: screw versus suture button fixation
Lisfranc open reduction and internal fixation in an athletic population: screw versus suture button fixation
Background: Primarily ligamentous Lisfranc injuries occur in athletic populations. Unstable Lisfranc injuries are treated with internal fixation or arthrodesis. Interna...
Surgical outcomes of intramedullary screw fixation for metacarpal fractures: a systematic review
Surgical outcomes of intramedullary screw fixation for metacarpal fractures: a systematic review
Background: Metacarpal fractures account for 33.3% of hand fractures. New surgical techniques have been developed to address this common injury, including retrograde in...
Influence of Different Fixed System in Osteoporotic Lumbar Vertebrae in Fusion:A 3D Finite Element Analysis
Influence of Different Fixed System in Osteoporotic Lumbar Vertebrae in Fusion:A 3D Finite Element Analysis
Abstract Background:Posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF) is the most common surgical method for lumbar fusion surgery, and pedicle screws(PS)can provide effective fixati...
Biomechanical characterization of bilateral pedicle screw internal fixation combinations on lumbar vertebrae
Biomechanical characterization of bilateral pedicle screw internal fixation combinations on lumbar vertebrae
Purpose Pedicle screw fixation has been considered a suitable surgical intervention for addressing a diverse range of indications involving the lumbar spinal segments, but the...
The Evaluation of a Novel Three-Dimensional Printed Expandable Pedicle Screw Sleeve Insert
The Evaluation of a Novel Three-Dimensional Printed Expandable Pedicle Screw Sleeve Insert
When used in combination with decompression, spinal fusion is a successful procedure for treating patients with spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis. While a number o...

Back to Top