Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Epistemic Teleology
View through CrossRef
Wedgwood focuses his discussion around two evaluative concepts: correctness and rationality. Wedgwood proposes that these two concepts are related in the following way: one belief state is more rational than another if and only if the first has less expected inaccuracy than the former. He argues, however, that this view should not be understood as a form of consequentialism since it is not the total consequences of a belief state that determine its rationality. The view is rather a version of epistemic teleology. Wedgwood deploys this view to illuminate the difference between synchronic and diachronic evaluation of belief states as well as to disarm objections that have been leveled against epistemic consequentialism.
Title: Epistemic Teleology
Description:
Wedgwood focuses his discussion around two evaluative concepts: correctness and rationality.
Wedgwood proposes that these two concepts are related in the following way: one belief state is more rational than another if and only if the first has less expected inaccuracy than the former.
He argues, however, that this view should not be understood as a form of consequentialism since it is not the total consequences of a belief state that determine its rationality.
The view is rather a version of epistemic teleology.
Wedgwood deploys this view to illuminate the difference between synchronic and diachronic evaluation of belief states as well as to disarm objections that have been leveled against epistemic consequentialism.
Related Results
The Dynamics of Epistemic Injustice
The Dynamics of Epistemic Injustice
Abstract
Epistemic injustice is inherently connected to epistemic power and epistemic agency: understanding and addressing the former allows us to better understand ...
Varieties of Teleology
Varieties of Teleology
This chapter considers the teleological claims made by Plato in his writings, according to which an event or action or natural phenomenon occurs for the sake of some end. Students ...
John Stuart Mill and Epistemic Democracy
John Stuart Mill and Epistemic Democracy
John Stuart Mill and Epistemic Democracy explores the epistemic, or cognitive, character of democratic institutional practices and the protection of basic liberties in Mill's polit...
Epistemic Genres
Epistemic Genres
This anthology brings together scholars from around the world to theorize and explore “epistemic genres” of digital games, which are defined by the social uses and meanings attribu...
Social Epistemology and Epistemic Agency
Social Epistemology and Epistemic Agency
The field of epistemology is undergoing significant changes. Primary among these changes is an ever growing appreciation for the role social influences play on one’s ability to acq...
Belief, Agency, and Knowledge
Belief, Agency, and Knowledge
Abstract
Epistemology is not just about the nature of knowledge or the analysis of concepts such as ‘knows’ and ‘justified’, it’s also about what we ought to believe...
Consensus as an Epistemic Norm for Group Acceptance
Consensus as an Epistemic Norm for Group Acceptance
What are the propositional attitude(s) involved in collective epistemic agency? There are two opposing camps on this question: the ascribers have defended an extended notion of bel...

