Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Network structure differences between subgroups of autistic adults
View through CrossRef
Purpose: Differences in (autism) characteristics are often reported between autistic and non-autistic adults, but also between autistic adults. We aim to determine whether mean differences correspond to differences in network structure of these characteristics in (a) autistic and non-autistic adults, and (b) two previously identified autism subgroups. Methods: 16 network variables related to demographic and psychological characteristics were included. First, Gaussian Graphical Models were used for network estimation in 261 autistic adults and 384 non-autistic comparisons aged 30-85 years. Second, we repeated this step within two previously identified autism subgroups (N1=124, N2=130). Third, sex differences were explored in the networks of the autism subgroups. Results: The networks of the autism and comparison groups differed on individual edges and visual inspection, although the Network Comparison Test showed no overall differences. The networks of autism subgroups were similar based on visual inspection and statistical comparisons. Sex did not impact the subgroup networks differently. Conclusion: Networks were more similar than different, but observed edge differences could be informative for targeted support. Focusing on mean differences is not sufficient to determine which factors (and associations) are important for autistic people. Thus, network analysis provides a valuable tool beyond assessing mean differences for autistic adults.
Center for Open Science
Title: Network structure differences between subgroups of autistic adults
Description:
Purpose: Differences in (autism) characteristics are often reported between autistic and non-autistic adults, but also between autistic adults.
We aim to determine whether mean differences correspond to differences in network structure of these characteristics in (a) autistic and non-autistic adults, and (b) two previously identified autism subgroups.
Methods: 16 network variables related to demographic and psychological characteristics were included.
First, Gaussian Graphical Models were used for network estimation in 261 autistic adults and 384 non-autistic comparisons aged 30-85 years.
Second, we repeated this step within two previously identified autism subgroups (N1=124, N2=130).
Third, sex differences were explored in the networks of the autism subgroups.
Results: The networks of the autism and comparison groups differed on individual edges and visual inspection, although the Network Comparison Test showed no overall differences.
The networks of autism subgroups were similar based on visual inspection and statistical comparisons.
Sex did not impact the subgroup networks differently.
Conclusion: Networks were more similar than different, but observed edge differences could be informative for targeted support.
Focusing on mean differences is not sufficient to determine which factors (and associations) are important for autistic people.
Thus, network analysis provides a valuable tool beyond assessing mean differences for autistic adults.
Related Results
Mindreading beliefs in same- and cross-neurotype interactions
Mindreading beliefs in same- and cross-neurotype interactions
A large sample of autistic and non-autistic adults was recruited to investigate whether self-reported beliefs about their own and other people’s mindreading abilities were in line ...
‘I feel trapped in my safe clothes’: The impact of tactile hyper-sensitivity on autistic adults
‘I feel trapped in my safe clothes’: The impact of tactile hyper-sensitivity on autistic adults
Clothing-related tactile hyper-sensitivity has been frequently reported among autistic people, but research investigating how this affects autistic adults is limited. This mixed-me...
Increased rates of chronic physical health conditions across all organ systems in autistic adolescents and adults
Increased rates of chronic physical health conditions across all organ systems in autistic adolescents and adults
AbstractBackgroundThe poorer physical health of autistic adults compared to non-autistic adults has been highlighted by several epidemiological studies. However, research has so fa...
Gender identity development in autistic individuals: An interview study
Gender identity development in autistic individuals: An interview study
Autistic individuals report more gender-related questions and gender incongruence compared to non-autistic peers. However, research on gender identity in autistic individuals lacks...
Rejection Sensitivity Dysphoria in Autistic Adults: A Scoping Review
Rejection Sensitivity Dysphoria in Autistic Adults: A Scoping Review
On social media, autistic adults use the term Rejection Sensitivity Dysphoria (RSD) to describe extreme responses to rejection and criticism. Because RSD is not an established rese...
‘It feels like a blessing’ – The experience of Hebrew-English bilingualism among autistic children: An interpretative phenomenological analysis
‘It feels like a blessing’ – The experience of Hebrew-English bilingualism among autistic children: An interpretative phenomenological analysis
Over half the world’s population are bilingual. Despite this, practitioners often advise parents of autistic children to teach their child one dominant national language and limit ...
An ethical advantage of autistic employees in the workplace
An ethical advantage of autistic employees in the workplace
Differences between autistic and nonautistic people are often framed as deficits. This research considers whether some of these differences might actually be strengths. In particul...
Autistic adults perceive and experience laughter differently to non-autistic adults
Autistic adults perceive and experience laughter differently to non-autistic adults
AbstractHuman interaction is immersed in laughter; though genuine and posed laughter are acoustically distinct, they are both crucial socio-emotional signals. In this novel study, ...

