Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Network structure differences between subgroups of autistic adults
View through CrossRef
Purpose: Differences in (autism) characteristics are often reported between autistic and non-autistic adults, but also between autistic adults. We aim to determine whether mean differences correspond to differences in network structure of these characteristics in (a) autistic and non-autistic adults, and (b) two previously identified autism subgroups. Methods: 16 network variables related to demographic and psychological characteristics were included. First, Gaussian Graphical Models were used for network estimation in 261 autistic adults and 384 non-autistic comparisons aged 30-85 years. Second, we repeated this step within two previously identified autism subgroups (N1=124, N2=130). Third, sex differences were explored in the networks of the autism subgroups. Results: The networks of the autism and comparison groups differed on individual edges and visual inspection, although the Network Comparison Test showed no overall differences. The networks of autism subgroups were similar based on visual inspection and statistical comparisons. Sex did not impact the subgroup networks differently. Conclusion: Networks were more similar than different, but observed edge differences could be informative for targeted support. Focusing on mean differences is not sufficient to determine which factors (and associations) are important for autistic people. Thus, network analysis provides a valuable tool beyond assessing mean differences for autistic adults.
Center for Open Science
Title: Network structure differences between subgroups of autistic adults
Description:
Purpose: Differences in (autism) characteristics are often reported between autistic and non-autistic adults, but also between autistic adults.
We aim to determine whether mean differences correspond to differences in network structure of these characteristics in (a) autistic and non-autistic adults, and (b) two previously identified autism subgroups.
Methods: 16 network variables related to demographic and psychological characteristics were included.
First, Gaussian Graphical Models were used for network estimation in 261 autistic adults and 384 non-autistic comparisons aged 30-85 years.
Second, we repeated this step within two previously identified autism subgroups (N1=124, N2=130).
Third, sex differences were explored in the networks of the autism subgroups.
Results: The networks of the autism and comparison groups differed on individual edges and visual inspection, although the Network Comparison Test showed no overall differences.
The networks of autism subgroups were similar based on visual inspection and statistical comparisons.
Sex did not impact the subgroup networks differently.
Conclusion: Networks were more similar than different, but observed edge differences could be informative for targeted support.
Focusing on mean differences is not sufficient to determine which factors (and associations) are important for autistic people.
Thus, network analysis provides a valuable tool beyond assessing mean differences for autistic adults.
Related Results
Mindreading beliefs in same- and cross-neurotype interactions
Mindreading beliefs in same- and cross-neurotype interactions
A large sample of autistic and non-autistic adults was recruited to investigate whether self-reported beliefs about their own and other people’s mindreading abilities were in line ...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
An ethical advantage of autistic employees in the workplace
An ethical advantage of autistic employees in the workplace
Differences between autistic and nonautistic people are often framed as deficits. This research considers whether some of these differences might actually be strengths. In particul...
Autistic adults perceive and experience laughter differently to non-autistic adults
Autistic adults perceive and experience laughter differently to non-autistic adults
AbstractHuman interaction is immersed in laughter; though genuine and posed laughter are acoustically distinct, they are both crucial socio-emotional signals. In this novel study, ...
Social camouflaging and mental health in adolescence: differences by sex and diagnosis
Social camouflaging and mental health in adolescence: differences by sex and diagnosis
Camouflaging is a term used to describe the set of strategies that autistic individuals use to hide or mask autistic traits. Importantly, nonautistic individuals can also camouflag...
Finding similarities in differences between autistic adults: Two replicated subgroups
Finding similarities in differences between autistic adults: Two replicated subgroups
Purpose: Autism is heterogeneous, which complicates providing tailored support and future prospects. We aim to identify subgroups in autistic adults with average to high intelligen...
Laughter in autism: perception and personal experience
Laughter in autism: perception and personal experience
Human interaction is immersed in laughter; though genuine and posed laughter are acoustically distinct, they are both crucial socio-emotional signals. In this novel study, autistic...
Autism and Literature
Autism and Literature
When autism was first conceptualized as a medical condition in the 1940s, an influential presumption was that to be autistic was to be profoundly limited in verbal language. Althou...

