Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Al-Moayad v. Germany
View through CrossRef
507Extradition — Extradition Treaty between Federal Republic of Germany and United States, 1978 — Applicant extradited from Germany to United States — Applicant detained in United States — United States assurance to German authorities that applicant would not be detained in facility outside United States — Whether binding — Whether applicant’s extradition violating Articles 3, 5(1), 6(1) and 34 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Whether applicant’s application admissibleHuman rights — Prohibition of torture — Absolute right — Article 3 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Whether substantial grounds for believing applicant facing real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 if extradited to United States — Assurance obtained from United States by German authorities — Effectiveness of assurance to avert risk of applicant being ill-treatedHuman rights — Right to liberty and security of person — Article 5 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Whether applicant’s detention pending extradition unlawful — Whether compatible with German law — Whether arrest and detention of applicant in Germany giving rise to problem under Article 5Human rights — Right to a fair trial — Article 6 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Applicability to applicant’s complaint of unfair trial in German courts — Whether applicant at risk of suffering flagrant denial of fair trial in United States — Assurance — Terms of 1978 Extradition Treaty — Importance of right to fair trial in criminal proceedings in democratic societyHuman rights — Right not to be hindered in exercise of right of application — Article 34 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Whether German authorities breaching Article 34 — Request for interim measure — Court Rule 39Terrorism — Applicant suspected terrorist — Reports of ill-treatment of suspected terrorists during interrogation in facilities outside United States — Whether applicant at risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 if extradited to United States — German authorities obtaining assurance from United States that applicant would not 508be detained in facility outside United States — Effectiveness of assurance — Human rights in democratic society in context of international terrorism
Title: Al-Moayad v. Germany
Description:
507Extradition — Extradition Treaty between Federal Republic of Germany and United States, 1978 — Applicant extradited from Germany to United States — Applicant detained in United States — United States assurance to German authorities that applicant would not be detained in facility outside United States — Whether binding — Whether applicant’s extradition violating Articles 3, 5(1), 6(1) and 34 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Whether applicant’s application admissibleHuman rights — Prohibition of torture — Absolute right — Article 3 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Whether substantial grounds for believing applicant facing real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 if extradited to United States — Assurance obtained from United States by German authorities — Effectiveness of assurance to avert risk of applicant being ill-treatedHuman rights — Right to liberty and security of person — Article 5 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Whether applicant’s detention pending extradition unlawful — Whether compatible with German law — Whether arrest and detention of applicant in Germany giving rise to problem under Article 5Human rights — Right to a fair trial — Article 6 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Applicability to applicant’s complaint of unfair trial in German courts — Whether applicant at risk of suffering flagrant denial of fair trial in United States — Assurance — Terms of 1978 Extradition Treaty — Importance of right to fair trial in criminal proceedings in democratic societyHuman rights — Right not to be hindered in exercise of right of application — Article 34 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Whether German authorities breaching Article 34 — Request for interim measure — Court Rule 39Terrorism — Applicant suspected terrorist — Reports of ill-treatment of suspected terrorists during interrogation in facilities outside United States — Whether applicant at risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 if extradited to United States — German authorities obtaining assurance from United States that applicant would not 508be detained in facility outside United States — Effectiveness of assurance — Human rights in democratic society in context of international terrorism.
Related Results
CISS reviewer acknowledgement 2023 & 2024
CISS reviewer acknowledgement 2023 & 2024
The practice of peer review is to ensure the research published in Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS) is of the highest standard. Peer review lies at the heart of scholarly pub...
Hospitalizations due to heart failure: major differences between East and West Germany even 30 years after reunification
Hospitalizations due to heart failure: major differences between East and West Germany even 30 years after reunification
Abstract
Background
Heart failure (HF) is one of the most common diseases in the adult population with a prevalence of about 4% ...
Modern Germany
Modern Germany
The beginning of modern Jewish history in central Europe is associated with the Haskalah, or Jewish enlightenment (cited under Beginning of Periods: Haskalah and Emancipation, 1780...
October 7, One Year Later: Resilience and Coping Among Jews in Germany Amid Rising Antisemitism and Collective Trauma
October 7, One Year Later: Resilience and Coping Among Jews in Germany Amid Rising Antisemitism and Collective Trauma
The October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel marked a significant turning point for Jewish communities worldwide, including in Germany. This study explored the experiences, perceptio...
Safaniya Lagoon Biodiversity Sanctuary
Safaniya Lagoon Biodiversity Sanctuary
Among the many goals of environmental management in Saudi Aramco, protection of special environmental areas is recognized as high priority to both the company and the Kingdom of Sa...
Case Report: Disseminated hydatid cyst: Unusual presentation and therapeutic challenges
Case Report: Disseminated hydatid cyst: Unusual presentation and therapeutic challenges
Introduction: Cystic echinococcosis (CE), caused by Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato, is a parasitic disease prevalent in endemic regions. CE frequently leads to the formation of...
Case Report: Disseminated hydatid cyst: Unusual presentation and therapeutic challenges
Case Report: Disseminated hydatid cyst: Unusual presentation and therapeutic challenges
Introduction: Cystic echinococcosis (CE), caused by Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato, is a parasitic disease prevalent in endemic regions. CE frequently leads to the formation of...
الهجرة غير الشرعية واليات المكافحة الدولية ( المنظمات العالمية والاتحاد الاوربي انموذجاً )
الهجرة غير الشرعية واليات المكافحة الدولية ( المنظمات العالمية والاتحاد الاوربي انموذجاً )
الهجرة غير الشرعية ظاهرة يتجسد مضمونها بالدخول غير المشروع للشخص الى دولة غير دولته بطرق غير مشروعة , وذلك بنية الاقامة الدائمة فيها , وتجدر الاشارة الى ثمة مجموعة من الاسباب تقف و...

