Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of the Outcomes between Ultrasound-Guided PCNL in Lateral Position and Open Nephrolithotomy for Patients with Staghorn Renal Stones

View through CrossRef
Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes of ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (US-PCNL) in lateral position and anatrophic nephrolithotomy (ANL) in the treatment of staghorn renal stones.Methods: This study includes individuals with staghorn renal stones who had an operation at Buri Ram Hospital in Thailand between October 2016 and July 2020. They were divided into two groups; group I includes patients undergoing US-PCNL (n= 114) and group II includes patients undergoing ANL (n=112). The outcomes regarding stone-free rates, the stone clearance rate, operative times, length of hospitalization, and complications were collected and analyzed.Results: The patient’s demographics and stone characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups, except that the ANL group had more preoperative hydronephrosis (78.6% vs. 53.5%, p < 0.001). Regarding the primary outcome, the stone-free rate was significantly lower in the US-PCNL group (47.4% vs. 75.9%, p < 0.001), whereas the stone clearance rate was not significantly different (96.4±6.0% in the US-PCNL group and 97.7±5.8% in the ANL group, p = 0.098). The major and minor complications between the two groups were not significantly different; however, the US-PCNL group had a significantly lower transfusion rate than the ANL group (3.5% vs. 17.9%, p < 0.001). The total operative time in both groups was not different; however, the length of stay at hospital for the US-PCNL was significantly shorter than for the ANL group (10.0 vs. 12.9 days, p = 0.002).Conclusion: The ANL had a higher stone-free rate; however, the stone clearance rate was not significantly different between the US-PCNL and ANL groups. There were many advantages of the US-PCNL over the ANL, such as less blood transfusion, shorter length of hospitalization, and no radiation exposure for the patients or the medical personnel, while the complications were not different between the two groups.
Title: Comparison of the Outcomes between Ultrasound-Guided PCNL in Lateral Position and Open Nephrolithotomy for Patients with Staghorn Renal Stones
Description:
Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes of ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (US-PCNL) in lateral position and anatrophic nephrolithotomy (ANL) in the treatment of staghorn renal stones.
Methods: This study includes individuals with staghorn renal stones who had an operation at Buri Ram Hospital in Thailand between October 2016 and July 2020.
They were divided into two groups; group I includes patients undergoing US-PCNL (n= 114) and group II includes patients undergoing ANL (n=112).
The outcomes regarding stone-free rates, the stone clearance rate, operative times, length of hospitalization, and complications were collected and analyzed.
Results: The patient’s demographics and stone characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups, except that the ANL group had more preoperative hydronephrosis (78.
6% vs.
53.
5%, p < 0.
001).
Regarding the primary outcome, the stone-free rate was significantly lower in the US-PCNL group (47.
4% vs.
75.
9%, p < 0.
001), whereas the stone clearance rate was not significantly different (96.
4±6.
0% in the US-PCNL group and 97.
7±5.
8% in the ANL group, p = 0.
098).
The major and minor complications between the two groups were not significantly different; however, the US-PCNL group had a significantly lower transfusion rate than the ANL group (3.
5% vs.
17.
9%, p < 0.
001).
The total operative time in both groups was not different; however, the length of stay at hospital for the US-PCNL was significantly shorter than for the ANL group (10.
0 vs.
12.
9 days, p = 0.
002).
Conclusion: The ANL had a higher stone-free rate; however, the stone clearance rate was not significantly different between the US-PCNL and ANL groups.
There were many advantages of the US-PCNL over the ANL, such as less blood transfusion, shorter length of hospitalization, and no radiation exposure for the patients or the medical personnel, while the complications were not different between the two groups.

Related Results

COMPARISON OF STONE FREE RATE OF STAGHORN STONE, RENAL PELVIC STONE, AND INFERIOR CALYX STONE FOLLOWING PCNL
COMPARISON OF STONE FREE RATE OF STAGHORN STONE, RENAL PELVIC STONE, AND INFERIOR CALYX STONE FOLLOWING PCNL
Objective: To compare the stone free rates on patients with staghorn, renal pelvic, and inferior calyx stones with stone burden < 20 mm, 21-30 mm, and > 30 mm following percu...
Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy as imaging guidance for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy as imaging guidance for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
AbstractObjectivesTo determine whether the outcomes of ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UG-PCNL), an alternative to traditional fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephr...
Hydroperitoneum: A complication of mini PCNL in pediatric age group? -A case report
Hydroperitoneum: A complication of mini PCNL in pediatric age group? -A case report
Abstract Renal stones constitute 40% of renal disorders in Pakistan with silent stones constituting up to 3%.  Nephrolithotomy and Pyelolithotomy were the only surgical optio...
Is Upper Pole Puncture for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) Safe and Effective?
Is Upper Pole Puncture for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) Safe and Effective?
Introduction: During this modern era of surgery, where miniaturization has taken a front row seat, endo-urology is flourishing like never before. PCNL has become the chosen tool fo...
Mini-PCNL in pediatric patients with large renal stones- A safety data
Mini-PCNL in pediatric patients with large renal stones- A safety data
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a recent advancement in the management of urolithiasis, it has now become the gold standard. This study aimed to assess the safety of mini PC...
Efficacy and Safety of Treatment Options for Large Upper Ureteral Stone
Efficacy and Safety of Treatment Options for Large Upper Ureteral Stone
Background: There are three minimally invasive methods for the treatment of large (>1 cm) upper ureteral stones: ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (...
Efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with body mass index over 30 kg/m2
Efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with body mass index over 30 kg/m2
Introduction and objective: With the increasing prevalence of urolithiasis, the world is also witnessing an epidemic of obesity. Management of such patients is challenging due to t...
A 3D Printing Personalized Percutaneous Nephroscope Puncture Guide Plate in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Pilot Study
A 3D Printing Personalized Percutaneous Nephroscope Puncture Guide Plate in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Pilot Study
Abstract Objective Using CTU, combined with 3D printing technology, digital design, the development of individualized PCNL) puncture guides, preliminary discussion of its f...

Back to Top