Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Checklist of the avian diversity of Alaska

View through CrossRef
More than just a state, Alaska constitutes the entire northwestern extent of North America. Alaska is a vast area (586,412 mi2/1,518,800 km2 of land), spanning nearly 60 degrees of longitude and 20 degrees of latitude, with roughly ~45,000 mi/72,000 km of coastline. The area considered here includes surrounding waters within the U. S. 200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zone (see Gibson and Withrow 2015) and thus represents an area of over 2,000,000 mi2/~5,000,000 km2. It represents the eastern half of Beringia, a pivotally important area for the exchange of New and Old World avifaunas and for high-latitude avian endemism (Winker et al. 2023). Spanning a wide swath of the northern reaches of the Pacific Ocean, Alaska hosts breeding migrants from all seven continents, including tens of millions of birds from Asia (Winker and Gibson 2010). There are three main intrinsic drivers of Alaska’s avian diversity: Its geographic size and position on the globe, the diversity of its aquatic and terrestrial habitats, and its dynamic history of climatic and habitat fluctuations. This region’s high latitude causes extreme annual seasonality, making migration a predominant life-history strategy among the state’s birds. With migration, especially long-distance migration, comes enhanced dispersal, increasing the likelihood of vagrancy and colonization. Diverse contemporary habitat types occur in extensive expanses of nearshore and offshore marine waters; marine, brackish, and freshwater littoral zones; freshwater wetlands, rivers, lakes, and streams; the variety of heath and tundra types that dominate the Aleutian and Bering Sea islands, much of western and northern Alaska, and alpine areas; and meadows, shrubs, taiga (boreal forest), and temperate rainforests (e.g., Gabrielson and Lincoln 1959; Kessel 1979, 1998; Audubon Alaska 2014). Because of past glacial cycles, the availability and distribution of these habitats has changed throughout the Pleistocene, but the lack of major glaciation throughout much of Beringia caused the region as a whole to be a large glacial refugium within which smaller refugia also existed for some birds (Winker et al. 2023). This long-term history generated high levels of regional endemism (for this latitude) among species and subspecies of birds (ibid). In addition, southeast Alaska extends into the Pacific Northwest refugium complex, adding further to the state’s avian diversity (Shafer et al. 2010, Winker et al. 2023). The historic climatic dynamism of the Pleistocene continues today and into the future with global warming, which is occurring about four times faster in Arctic regions than elsewhere (Previdi et al. 2021, Rantanen et al. 2022). Alaska’s extensive Arctic environments (see U.S. Congress 1984) are thus undergoing rapid changes, affecting avian occurrences and distributions in multiple ways (e.g., Marcot et al. 2015, Smith et al. 2019, Renner et al. 2024). Importantly, many changes will not be due to habitat shifts. Among migratory birds in this region, extensive movements are made in eastern and western directions, such that the time available to reproduce, more than habitat, dictates range limits. As growing seasons lengthen, these range limits can change rapidly (see Benson and Winker 2015, Winker and Gibson 2018). Together, these drivers explain not only the current diversity of Alaska birds, but also why we expect this list to continue to grow over time. The starting point for this list is AOU (1998) and supplements through Chesser et al. (2023) for phylogenetic sequence and the limits of families, genera, and species. We no longer follow this list, because the American Ornithological Society decided to use avian nomenclature as a tool of social activism. This leaves us free to retain long-used names and to occasionally disagree over interpretations of the scientific evidence for some taxonomic changes. These differences can be found in the NOTES sections of the affected taxa and are summarized in the Appendix. For subspecies, the starting point is Gibson and Withrow (2015) and the two subsequent reports of the Alaska Checklist Committee (Gibson et al. 2018, 2023). The Alaska Checklist Committee (ACC) has been instrumental in collating, assessing, and publishing new records of Alaska birds. Designation of status (rare, casual, accidental; see Key to occurrence, below) at the species level follows this committee’s Checklist of Alaska Birds, 31st edition (Gibson et al. 2025). Changes from these starting points are based on published evidence and are referenced and explained (except for changes to status, which can generally be found in the ACC reports). The breeding status for all taxa is also given (see Key).We consider subspecies to be populations or groups of populations that breed in a portion of the species’ range that have a diagnosably different phenotype from other subspecies (in presumably heritable traits). Subspecies have the potential for gene flow between them, and diagnosability generally follows the 75% Rule (Patten and Unitt 2002, Winker and Haig 2010). We recognize that some of the subspecies recognized here might not meet stringent contemporary standards of diagnosability, but until they are examined in more detail and those results are published, we maintain the historical perspective as a working hypothesis. Subspecies in brackets are those not represented by an archived specimen and/or where the identity is an inference (usually geographic). Our ability to find differences among populations, especially in genetics, has grown immensely, but some traits (e.g., neutral genetic differences, vocalizations in taxa where they are learned) are not as indicative of the long-term, adaptive changes that subspecies nomenclature attempts to capture. For brevity, we do not give distributional statements, those being available elsewhere (e.g., AOU 1957, 1998; Vaurie 1959, 1965; Dickinson and Remsen 2013; Dickinson and Christidis 2014; del Hoyo and Collar 2014, 2016; Gibson and Withrow 2015; etc.). Full citations to the authorities for taxa listed here can be obtained, for example, from A. P. Peterson’s website (Zoonomen.net), D. Lepage’s and Birds Canada website Avibase (avibase.bsc-eoc.org), and in Lynx Edicions Handbook of the Birds of the World series.Alaska’s avian checklist has grown at a remarkably steady average of 3.5 species per year since the mid-1900s and shows no sign of reaching an asymptote. Gabrielson and Lincoln (1959) discussed 311 species of Alaska birds, and that number grew steadily through Kessel and Gibson (1978: 381), Gibson and Kessel (1992: 436), Gibson and Kessel (1997: 448), Gibson et al. (2003: 468), Gibson et al. (2008: 485), Gibson et al. (2013: 499), Gibson et al. (2018: 521), and Gibson et al. (2023: 541). This checklist of Alaska’s birds now includes 548 species and an additional 119 subspecies. Of these 548 species, 55 are rare, 159 are casual, and 85 are accidental; 234 species regularly breed within the state (“B”; with an additional 75 regularly breeding subspecies). An additional 38 species have at one time or another bred within the state (“b”), and 8 probably have (“?”), but are not here considered a normal part of the nesting avifauna.
Title: Checklist of the avian diversity of Alaska
Description:
More than just a state, Alaska constitutes the entire northwestern extent of North America.
Alaska is a vast area (586,412 mi2/1,518,800 km2 of land), spanning nearly 60 degrees of longitude and 20 degrees of latitude, with roughly ~45,000 mi/72,000 km of coastline.
The area considered here includes surrounding waters within the U.
S.
200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zone (see Gibson and Withrow 2015) and thus represents an area of over 2,000,000 mi2/~5,000,000 km2.
It represents the eastern half of Beringia, a pivotally important area for the exchange of New and Old World avifaunas and for high-latitude avian endemism (Winker et al.
2023).
Spanning a wide swath of the northern reaches of the Pacific Ocean, Alaska hosts breeding migrants from all seven continents, including tens of millions of birds from Asia (Winker and Gibson 2010).
There are three main intrinsic drivers of Alaska’s avian diversity: Its geographic size and position on the globe, the diversity of its aquatic and terrestrial habitats, and its dynamic history of climatic and habitat fluctuations.
This region’s high latitude causes extreme annual seasonality, making migration a predominant life-history strategy among the state’s birds.
With migration, especially long-distance migration, comes enhanced dispersal, increasing the likelihood of vagrancy and colonization.
Diverse contemporary habitat types occur in extensive expanses of nearshore and offshore marine waters; marine, brackish, and freshwater littoral zones; freshwater wetlands, rivers, lakes, and streams; the variety of heath and tundra types that dominate the Aleutian and Bering Sea islands, much of western and northern Alaska, and alpine areas; and meadows, shrubs, taiga (boreal forest), and temperate rainforests (e.
g.
, Gabrielson and Lincoln 1959; Kessel 1979, 1998; Audubon Alaska 2014).
Because of past glacial cycles, the availability and distribution of these habitats has changed throughout the Pleistocene, but the lack of major glaciation throughout much of Beringia caused the region as a whole to be a large glacial refugium within which smaller refugia also existed for some birds (Winker et al.
2023).
This long-term history generated high levels of regional endemism (for this latitude) among species and subspecies of birds (ibid).
In addition, southeast Alaska extends into the Pacific Northwest refugium complex, adding further to the state’s avian diversity (Shafer et al.
2010, Winker et al.
2023).
The historic climatic dynamism of the Pleistocene continues today and into the future with global warming, which is occurring about four times faster in Arctic regions than elsewhere (Previdi et al.
2021, Rantanen et al.
2022).
Alaska’s extensive Arctic environments (see U.
S.
Congress 1984) are thus undergoing rapid changes, affecting avian occurrences and distributions in multiple ways (e.
g.
, Marcot et al.
2015, Smith et al.
2019, Renner et al.
2024).
Importantly, many changes will not be due to habitat shifts.
Among migratory birds in this region, extensive movements are made in eastern and western directions, such that the time available to reproduce, more than habitat, dictates range limits.
As growing seasons lengthen, these range limits can change rapidly (see Benson and Winker 2015, Winker and Gibson 2018).
Together, these drivers explain not only the current diversity of Alaska birds, but also why we expect this list to continue to grow over time.
The starting point for this list is AOU (1998) and supplements through Chesser et al.
(2023) for phylogenetic sequence and the limits of families, genera, and species.
We no longer follow this list, because the American Ornithological Society decided to use avian nomenclature as a tool of social activism.
This leaves us free to retain long-used names and to occasionally disagree over interpretations of the scientific evidence for some taxonomic changes.
These differences can be found in the NOTES sections of the affected taxa and are summarized in the Appendix.
For subspecies, the starting point is Gibson and Withrow (2015) and the two subsequent reports of the Alaska Checklist Committee (Gibson et al.
2018, 2023).
The Alaska Checklist Committee (ACC) has been instrumental in collating, assessing, and publishing new records of Alaska birds.
Designation of status (rare, casual, accidental; see Key to occurrence, below) at the species level follows this committee’s Checklist of Alaska Birds, 31st edition (Gibson et al.
2025).
Changes from these starting points are based on published evidence and are referenced and explained (except for changes to status, which can generally be found in the ACC reports).
The breeding status for all taxa is also given (see Key).
We consider subspecies to be populations or groups of populations that breed in a portion of the species’ range that have a diagnosably different phenotype from other subspecies (in presumably heritable traits).
Subspecies have the potential for gene flow between them, and diagnosability generally follows the 75% Rule (Patten and Unitt 2002, Winker and Haig 2010).
We recognize that some of the subspecies recognized here might not meet stringent contemporary standards of diagnosability, but until they are examined in more detail and those results are published, we maintain the historical perspective as a working hypothesis.
Subspecies in brackets are those not represented by an archived specimen and/or where the identity is an inference (usually geographic).
Our ability to find differences among populations, especially in genetics, has grown immensely, but some traits (e.
g.
, neutral genetic differences, vocalizations in taxa where they are learned) are not as indicative of the long-term, adaptive changes that subspecies nomenclature attempts to capture.
For brevity, we do not give distributional statements, those being available elsewhere (e.
g.
, AOU 1957, 1998; Vaurie 1959, 1965; Dickinson and Remsen 2013; Dickinson and Christidis 2014; del Hoyo and Collar 2014, 2016; Gibson and Withrow 2015; etc.
).
Full citations to the authorities for taxa listed here can be obtained, for example, from A.
P.
Peterson’s website (Zoonomen.
net), D.
Lepage’s and Birds Canada website Avibase (avibase.
bsc-eoc.
org), and in Lynx Edicions Handbook of the Birds of the World series.
Alaska’s avian checklist has grown at a remarkably steady average of 3.
5 species per year since the mid-1900s and shows no sign of reaching an asymptote.
Gabrielson and Lincoln (1959) discussed 311 species of Alaska birds, and that number grew steadily through Kessel and Gibson (1978: 381), Gibson and Kessel (1992: 436), Gibson and Kessel (1997: 448), Gibson et al.
(2003: 468), Gibson et al.
(2008: 485), Gibson et al.
(2013: 499), Gibson et al.
(2018: 521), and Gibson et al.
(2023: 541).
This checklist of Alaska’s birds now includes 548 species and an additional 119 subspecies.
Of these 548 species, 55 are rare, 159 are casual, and 85 are accidental; 234 species regularly breed within the state (“B”; with an additional 75 regularly breeding subspecies).
An additional 38 species have at one time or another bred within the state (“b”), and 8 probably have (“?”), but are not here considered a normal part of the nesting avifauna.

Related Results

DEIXIS IN JOHN GREEN’S NOVEL ENTITLED LOOKING FOR ALASKA
DEIXIS IN JOHN GREEN’S NOVEL ENTITLED LOOKING FOR ALASKA
This thesis studies the use of deixis that occurred in John Green’s novel entitiled Looking for Alaska. The objectives of this research are classifying the types of deixis found in...
Impact of Vegetation Cover Structure on Birds' Community at Tianfu National Wetland Park in Jiangsu Kunshan, China
Impact of Vegetation Cover Structure on Birds' Community at Tianfu National Wetland Park in Jiangsu Kunshan, China
Abstract Background: Vegetation cover has an essential role in wetland habitats in controlling avian populations throughout the world. The vegetation cover structure in gra...
Impact of Vegetation Cover Structure on Birds' Community at Tianfu National Wetland Park in Jiangsu Kunshan, China
Impact of Vegetation Cover Structure on Birds' Community at Tianfu National Wetland Park in Jiangsu Kunshan, China
Abstract Vegetation cover has an essential role in wetland habitats in controlling avian populations throughout the world. The vegetation cover structure in grassland syste...
Impact of Vegetation Cover Structure on Birds' Community at Tianfu National Wetland Park in Jiangsu Kunshan, China
Impact of Vegetation Cover Structure on Birds' Community at Tianfu National Wetland Park in Jiangsu Kunshan, China
Abstract Vegetation cover has an essential role in wetland habitats in controlling avian populations throughout the world. The vegetation cover structure in grassland syste...
Avian species diversity in the southern Gulf of Lake Tana and head of the Blue Nile River, Ethiopia
Avian species diversity in the southern Gulf of Lake Tana and head of the Blue Nile River, Ethiopia
Avian study in the southern Gulf of Lake Tana and head of the Blue Nile River, Ethiopia was conducted from June 2016 to April 2017 during the wet and dry seasons to examine species...
Global Perspective on Diversity and Inclusion
Global Perspective on Diversity and Inclusion
Diversity and inclusion are two terms that provide an umbrella for efforts to tackle discrimination, exclusion, and inequality by valuing diversity and promoting inclusion for hist...
Revolutionising avian pathology: The impact of molecular diagnostics
Revolutionising avian pathology: The impact of molecular diagnostics
The field of avian pathology has experienced substantial advancements over the past few decades, primarily due to the integration of molecular diagnostics. This paper explores the ...
Emergence and Molecular Characterization of an Avian Hepatitis E Virus From Donglan Black Chicken in Southern China
Emergence and Molecular Characterization of an Avian Hepatitis E Virus From Donglan Black Chicken in Southern China
Avian hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a major pathogen associated with hepatitis splenomegaly syndrome in chickens and has been reported in China. Phylogenetic trees, Bayesian analysis,...

Back to Top