Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Urban Vitality Open Science Checklist
View through CrossRef
The Urban Vitality Open Science Checklist (UV-OSCL) is a list of 14 items that helps researchers work according to open science principles in all phases of their research
Those open science principles are: transparency, accessibility, reproducibility, citizen science and FAIR data management. In addition, the UV-OSCL wants to inspire institutional policy makers to create policies that maximize the facilitation of responsible research practices. This can be done by making the checklist central to research applications, research execution and research program monitoring.
How to use the Urban Vitality Open Science Checklist.
The checklist can be used structurally and incidentally.
Structural use. The checklist will reach its maximum potential if the management of knowledge centers and CoEs use the checklist as a policy tool and organize their pre-award and post-award research processes around the checklist items. Annually, for example, a data steward could check with researchers on a project in an open dialogue to see which of the 14 items have been met. In this way, the progress of the knowledge center or CoE can be monitored over time and it is learned which items are difficult or easy to implement and how the policy (or possibly the checklist itself) can be adjusted accordingly. If such discussions can include the end responsible professors, this is highly recommended.
Incidental use. In research projects, researchers can use the checklist as a compass, which if followed, leads to highly responsible research practice and the avoidance of 'research waste'.
The UV-OSCL begins with a general question about having an Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) of the team members in the research project. This is followed by thirteen items that are loosely arranged in a time sequence and are divided into four phases of research: application, planning, execution, and completion. When using the checklist structurally, professors or support desk staff could engage with the researcher in a discussion about how the team wants to implement the principles the checklist points out. The checklist and accompanying infographic depicting the checklist are linked via links to 14 corresponding chapters of the Urban Vitality Open Science Research Manual. The manual succinctly but clearly explains the background of the items and how the items can be met efficiently.
The checklist can also be used by institutions to send a signal to funders: We endorse this checklist, try to work according to the checklist as much as possible and can therefore guarantee that the grant is spent on responsible research.
Where does the Urban Vitality Open Science Checklist come from?
The Urban Vitality Open Science Checklist was developed at the Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences. Specifically, it comes from the SIA project Mensen in Beweging . In 2020, the methodologist and the data steward, who were responsible for the work package Quality Improvement, combined their joint knowledge about four sources of inspiration into the checklist. These sources of inspiration are: the Dutch Code of Conduct for Scientific Integrity, the Open Science transparency principles, the literature on Avoidable Research Waste and that on the replication crisis in science.
Title: Urban Vitality Open Science Checklist
Description:
The Urban Vitality Open Science Checklist (UV-OSCL) is a list of 14 items that helps researchers work according to open science principles in all phases of their research
Those open science principles are: transparency, accessibility, reproducibility, citizen science and FAIR data management.
In addition, the UV-OSCL wants to inspire institutional policy makers to create policies that maximize the facilitation of responsible research practices.
This can be done by making the checklist central to research applications, research execution and research program monitoring.
How to use the Urban Vitality Open Science Checklist.
The checklist can be used structurally and incidentally.
Structural use.
The checklist will reach its maximum potential if the management of knowledge centers and CoEs use the checklist as a policy tool and organize their pre-award and post-award research processes around the checklist items.
Annually, for example, a data steward could check with researchers on a project in an open dialogue to see which of the 14 items have been met.
In this way, the progress of the knowledge center or CoE can be monitored over time and it is learned which items are difficult or easy to implement and how the policy (or possibly the checklist itself) can be adjusted accordingly.
If such discussions can include the end responsible professors, this is highly recommended.
Incidental use.
In research projects, researchers can use the checklist as a compass, which if followed, leads to highly responsible research practice and the avoidance of 'research waste'.
The UV-OSCL begins with a general question about having an Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) of the team members in the research project.
This is followed by thirteen items that are loosely arranged in a time sequence and are divided into four phases of research: application, planning, execution, and completion.
When using the checklist structurally, professors or support desk staff could engage with the researcher in a discussion about how the team wants to implement the principles the checklist points out.
The checklist and accompanying infographic depicting the checklist are linked via links to 14 corresponding chapters of the Urban Vitality Open Science Research Manual.
The manual succinctly but clearly explains the background of the items and how the items can be met efficiently.
The checklist can also be used by institutions to send a signal to funders: We endorse this checklist, try to work according to the checklist as much as possible and can therefore guarantee that the grant is spent on responsible research.
Where does the Urban Vitality Open Science Checklist come from?
The Urban Vitality Open Science Checklist was developed at the Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences.
Specifically, it comes from the SIA project Mensen in Beweging .
In 2020, the methodologist and the data steward, who were responsible for the work package Quality Improvement, combined their joint knowledge about four sources of inspiration into the checklist.
These sources of inspiration are: the Dutch Code of Conduct for Scientific Integrity, the Open Science transparency principles, the literature on Avoidable Research Waste and that on the replication crisis in science.
Related Results
Vitality Analysis Algorithm in the Study of Plant Individuals and Populations
Vitality Analysis Algorithm in the Study of Plant Individuals and Populations
Background:
The article presents an algorithm of the vitality analysis of plant individuals in the populations that enables the assessment of the prospects for the ...
Territories -in- between
Territories -in- between
There is an increasing body of literature suggesting that the conventional idea of a gradual transition in spatial structure from urban to rural does not properly reflect contempor...
Does urban renewal enhance urban vitality? A case study of Nanjing, China, using multidimensional data
Does urban renewal enhance urban vitality? A case study of Nanjing, China, using multidimensional data
Urban renewal is critical for improving city functionality after reaching a certain urbanization level. Although urban vitality is an effective indicator of the spatiotemporal effe...
Umbilical Artery Doppler Measurements in Last Week of Pregnancy and Correlation with Vitality of Newborn Lambs
Umbilical Artery Doppler Measurements in Last Week of Pregnancy and Correlation with Vitality of Newborn Lambs
Background: There is a high lamb mortality rate during the first 3 days of life, resulting in sheep flock economic losses and neonate welfare concerns. A significant number of neon...
Delineating Dynamic-Static Coupled Living Circles: Diagnosing Walkable Vitality for Targeted Urban Renewal—A Case Study of Baohe District, Hefei, China
Delineating Dynamic-Static Coupled Living Circles: Diagnosing Walkable Vitality for Targeted Urban Renewal—A Case Study of Baohe District, Hefei, China
In response to environmental degradation and social inequities exacerbated by automobile-dependent urban sprawl, this study proposes a framework for dynamic delineation and vitalit...
Adaptive Planning for Resilient Coastal Waterfronts
Adaptive Planning for Resilient Coastal Waterfronts
Many delta and coastal cities worldwide face increasing flood risk due to changing climate conditions and sea level rise. The question is how to develop measures and strategies for...
Development of a Comprehensive Human Factor and Ergonomics Checklist for Workplace Inspections Using a Macroergonomics Approach
Development of a Comprehensive Human Factor and Ergonomics Checklist for Workplace Inspections Using a Macroergonomics Approach
Lack of time and manpower as well as a fragmented inspection process are some of the challenges faced by industrial hygiene inspectors from the Malaysian Department of Occupational...
Vitality-Oriented Commercial Street Design Strategies: A Multi-Dimensional Quantitative Analysis of Chunxi Road, Chengdu, China
Vitality-Oriented Commercial Street Design Strategies: A Multi-Dimensional Quantitative Analysis of Chunxi Road, Chengdu, China
Research efforts to explain urban vitality encompass accessibility studies, place-based qualitative studies, morphological analysis, and land use studies. While several of these is...

