Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Contemporary Shia–Sunni Sectarian Violence
View through CrossRef
Religious violence, primarily stemming from Shia–Sunni conflicts, has occupied the center stage in contemporary Middle East. It’s most recent brutal expression, which is viewed as a symptom rather than the cause, is the rise of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS; also called the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant; ISIL) in the summer of 2014 and the violence it unleashed against the Shias, the anti-ISIS Sunnis and other non-Muslim groups across and beyond the Middle East. The violence did not erupt suddenly, however: it is an outcome of a myriad of complex historical, religious, political, economic, and geopolitical factors. Historically, tensions between Islam’s two rival sects, the Shias and the Sunnis, have existed, especially after the Battle of Karbala in 680 (which saw the defeat of Husayn ibn Ali, the grandson of Prophet Muhammad and the younger son of Ali ibn Abi Talib, the son-in-law of the Prophet and the fourth caliph of Islam, at the hand of Damascus-based Umayyad Caliph Yazid I), mostly in abeyance but occasionally resulting in encounters. In the contemporary context, a host of factors, most notably external interventions including the 2003 US invasion of Iraq and the toppling of the minority Sunni-led Saddam Hussein government, the sectarianization of politics by the Gulf Arab monarchs, Iran, and other dictatorial regimes in the region to consolidate regime survival, and the geopolitical competitions for power and influence between the region’s two archrivals: the Shia powerhouse Iran and the self-proclaimed defender of the Sunnis, Saudi Arabia, have greatly abetted violence between Islam’s two rival sects. Bahrain, Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon, and Syria are the battleground states where the two regional heavyweights, being aided by two extra-regional powers, the United States and the Russian Federation, are jostling and jockeying to edge each other out to claim regional preeminence. The malaise of sectarian violence took a more serious toll on the peoples and societies in the region after the outbreak of Arab movements for democracy, what is dubbed the Arab Spring, in December 2010 and what is continuing today. This article partially originates from the author’s research project “Shia – Sunni Sectarian Violence and Middle East Regional Security” funded by the European Union and tenable at Durham University, U.K.
Title: Contemporary Shia–Sunni Sectarian Violence
Description:
Religious violence, primarily stemming from Shia–Sunni conflicts, has occupied the center stage in contemporary Middle East.
It’s most recent brutal expression, which is viewed as a symptom rather than the cause, is the rise of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS; also called the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant; ISIL) in the summer of 2014 and the violence it unleashed against the Shias, the anti-ISIS Sunnis and other non-Muslim groups across and beyond the Middle East.
The violence did not erupt suddenly, however: it is an outcome of a myriad of complex historical, religious, political, economic, and geopolitical factors.
Historically, tensions between Islam’s two rival sects, the Shias and the Sunnis, have existed, especially after the Battle of Karbala in 680 (which saw the defeat of Husayn ibn Ali, the grandson of Prophet Muhammad and the younger son of Ali ibn Abi Talib, the son-in-law of the Prophet and the fourth caliph of Islam, at the hand of Damascus-based Umayyad Caliph Yazid I), mostly in abeyance but occasionally resulting in encounters.
In the contemporary context, a host of factors, most notably external interventions including the 2003 US invasion of Iraq and the toppling of the minority Sunni-led Saddam Hussein government, the sectarianization of politics by the Gulf Arab monarchs, Iran, and other dictatorial regimes in the region to consolidate regime survival, and the geopolitical competitions for power and influence between the region’s two archrivals: the Shia powerhouse Iran and the self-proclaimed defender of the Sunnis, Saudi Arabia, have greatly abetted violence between Islam’s two rival sects.
Bahrain, Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon, and Syria are the battleground states where the two regional heavyweights, being aided by two extra-regional powers, the United States and the Russian Federation, are jostling and jockeying to edge each other out to claim regional preeminence.
The malaise of sectarian violence took a more serious toll on the peoples and societies in the region after the outbreak of Arab movements for democracy, what is dubbed the Arab Spring, in December 2010 and what is continuing today.
This article partially originates from the author’s research project “Shia – Sunni Sectarian Violence and Middle East Regional Security” funded by the European Union and tenable at Durham University, U.
K.
Related Results
Shia Sunni Dynamics in Palembang City
Shia Sunni Dynamics in Palembang City
This study aims to analyse the dynamics between Shia and Sunni Muslims in Palembang City, which is important considering that these two sects often experience friction in the relig...
AKAR-AKAR TRADISI POLITIK SUNNI DI INDONESIA
AKAR-AKAR TRADISI POLITIK SUNNI DI INDONESIA
The Sunni doctrine plays an important role in the government. Its accommodative characteristic is something important that makes Sunni doctrine to be a device of the legitimation o...
Shia-centric State-Building and Sunni Rejection in Post-2003 Iraq
Shia-centric State-Building and Sunni Rejection in Post-2003 Iraq
Both Shia-centric state building and Sunni rejection of the post-2003 order are the result of cumulative processes that have unfolded over the course of the twentieth century. Thes...
Sectarian Violence: A Sociological Analysis of Sukkur Division
Sectarian Violence: A Sociological Analysis of Sukkur Division
AbstractPurpose: To determine the causes, consequences, and potential outcomes of conflict resolution, this study investigates the social elements of sectarian violence in the Sukk...
Autentisitas Hadis Menurut Syiah
Autentisitas Hadis Menurut Syiah
In the Ahlussunah manhaj, the parameter in interacting with ḥadīṡ is understanding ṡubūt al-Sunnah, namely being able to determine the authenticity or knowing the accuracy of a ḥad...
Sectarianism in a Non-Sectarian State. (c2020)
Sectarianism in a Non-Sectarian State. (c2020)
This thesis contributes to a new literature that addresses sectarianism in non-sectarian contexts. It examines the reasons behind sectarian sentiments in Jordan by looking at three...
Hukum Nikah Mut’ah
Hukum Nikah Mut’ah
Mut'ah marriage has become a phenomenon that has reaped pros and cons from Jumhur Ulama and Shia circles. This is because the Jumhur Ulama scholars do not allow mutah marriages and...
Problematic aspects of criminal prosecution for domestic violence
Problematic aspects of criminal prosecution for domestic violence
mestic violence.The article is devoted to the analysis of the features of bringing criminal responsibility for committing domestic violence. It has been proven that the establishme...

