Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

“Are all diseases dead”: The Likelihood of an Attribution to Ben Jonson

View through CrossRef
Arents S288 (Acc. No. 5442), pp. 87–88, and Rosenbach 239/27, p. 327, attribute the poem that begins “Are all diseases dead nor will death say” to Ben Jonson. While A.S.W. Rosenbach (1876–1952) owned both of these manuscripts at one point, it was actually Edwin Wolf 2nd (1911–1991) who penciled in the Jonson attributions in both manuscripts. However, the poem is found in many other manuscripts without this attribution. This paper considers the origin and validity of Wolf's attribution, and then asks, apart from Wolf's attribution, if it is plausible that Jonson wrote the poem. Wolf's consistently correct attributions in Arents S288 and correct attribution in MS 239/27 indicate that he was not as unreliable as the Rosenbach Museum & Library suggests. Ludovick Stuart, the Duke of Lennox and Richmond, who is the subject of the poem, died on 16 February 1624. My research demonstrates that an attribution to Jonson is highly plausible in terms of biographical, manuscript, and stylistic evidence. Jonson knew the poem's subject: he lived with the Duke's brother, Esmé Stuart, Lord d'Aubigny, for many years, and d'Aubigny occupied the role of patron. While the poem is elsewhere attributed to Sir John Eliot (b. 1592) or John Donne, neither is a strong candidate. The Duke fulfills the categories that I establish as Jonson's motivations to write in this poetic form: he was a significant figure and he had a personal connection to Jonson. Moreover, Jonson wrote for d'Aubigny's family on repeated occasions – and at length – over many decades.
Edinburgh University Press
Title: “Are all diseases dead”: The Likelihood of an Attribution to Ben Jonson
Description:
Arents S288 (Acc.
No.
5442), pp.
87–88, and Rosenbach 239/27, p.
327, attribute the poem that begins “Are all diseases dead nor will death say” to Ben Jonson.
While A.
S.
W.
Rosenbach (1876–1952) owned both of these manuscripts at one point, it was actually Edwin Wolf 2nd (1911–1991) who penciled in the Jonson attributions in both manuscripts.
However, the poem is found in many other manuscripts without this attribution.
This paper considers the origin and validity of Wolf's attribution, and then asks, apart from Wolf's attribution, if it is plausible that Jonson wrote the poem.
Wolf's consistently correct attributions in Arents S288 and correct attribution in MS 239/27 indicate that he was not as unreliable as the Rosenbach Museum & Library suggests.
Ludovick Stuart, the Duke of Lennox and Richmond, who is the subject of the poem, died on 16 February 1624.
My research demonstrates that an attribution to Jonson is highly plausible in terms of biographical, manuscript, and stylistic evidence.
Jonson knew the poem's subject: he lived with the Duke's brother, Esmé Stuart, Lord d'Aubigny, for many years, and d'Aubigny occupied the role of patron.
While the poem is elsewhere attributed to Sir John Eliot (b.
1592) or John Donne, neither is a strong candidate.
The Duke fulfills the categories that I establish as Jonson's motivations to write in this poetic form: he was a significant figure and he had a personal connection to Jonson.
Moreover, Jonson wrote for d'Aubigny's family on repeated occasions – and at length – over many decades.

Related Results

Ben Jonson on Father Thomas Wright
Ben Jonson on Father Thomas Wright
This article reassesses Ben Jonson's relationship to the Roman-Catholic priest and missionary Thomas Wright (c. 1561–1623). Wright plays two roles in critical accounts of Jonson's ...
Judging Jonson: Ben Jonson's Satirical Self-Defense in Poetaster
Judging Jonson: Ben Jonson's Satirical Self-Defense in Poetaster
This essay argues that Ben Jonson's antagonism with his audience in the comical satires was at least in part related to his translation of the satirist to the theater. Whereas prin...
“Red silence”: Ben Jonson and the Breath of Sound
“Red silence”: Ben Jonson and the Breath of Sound
In the prologue to Every Man in His Humour, Ben Jonson dismissed sound effects in favour of the spoken word; yet, throughout his work, Jonson uses sound to shocking and even violen...
Against Stanley Fish on Ben Jonson and the Community of the Same
Against Stanley Fish on Ben Jonson and the Community of the Same
In his classic essay “Authors-Readers: Ben Jonson and the Community of the Same,” Stanley Fish argues, primarily on the basis of a series of close readings, that (1) Jonson's poetr...
Ben Jonson's Reception of Lucian
Ben Jonson's Reception of Lucian
Throughout his career Ben Jonson drew variously upon Lucian, whom he encountered in the mythographies as well as in several Greek and Latin editions he owned. Jonson's receptions t...
Jonson and Performance
Jonson and Performance
Abstract For Una Ellis-Fermor, there is a ‘deeply inherent non-dramatic principle’ in the drama of Ben Jonson, a fundamental dislike of theatricality, and a pursuit ...
Jonson’s Patrons
Jonson’s Patrons
AbstractIn a landmark essay published in 1984, Stanley Fish offered a reading of Jonson’s non-dramatic works in which he argued that Jonson persistently sought to imagine an altern...
Laborious Ben Jonson
Laborious Ben Jonson
This essay discusses labor in the poetry of Ben Jonson and engages some notable recent critical assessments of Jonson's labor as a concept determined by material production. Contem...

Back to Top