Javascript must be enabled to continue!
“Red silence”: Ben Jonson and the Breath of Sound
View through CrossRef
In the prologue to Every Man in His Humour, Ben Jonson dismissed sound effects in favour of the spoken word; yet, throughout his work, Jonson uses sound to shocking and even violent effect. By examining the acoustics of Jonson's poem, A Panegyre on the Happy Entrance of James… to His First High Session of Parliament (1604), this article demonstrates that Jonson developed a distinct theory of sound, drawn from and often disagreeing with the work of Aristotle and Horace. It considers Jonson's pencil annotations on a copy of Thomas More's Carmen Gratulatorium (1509), to which his own poem is greatly indebted, and shows that these annotations are often made beside lines concerned with noise. Jonson's acoustic theory – which is dependent on an early modern understanding of the voice and of breath – is then traced throughout three of his comedies (Volpone, The Alchemist, and Epicoene). The article finally considers the responses of early readers of Jonson's dramatic work and their engagement with his sonic stage directions in Epicoene. It concludes that Jonson equivocates about the importance of sound, dismissing such “noise” only to discuss it at length in the next breath.
Title: “Red silence”: Ben Jonson and the Breath of Sound
Description:
In the prologue to Every Man in His Humour, Ben Jonson dismissed sound effects in favour of the spoken word; yet, throughout his work, Jonson uses sound to shocking and even violent effect.
By examining the acoustics of Jonson's poem, A Panegyre on the Happy Entrance of James… to His First High Session of Parliament (1604), this article demonstrates that Jonson developed a distinct theory of sound, drawn from and often disagreeing with the work of Aristotle and Horace.
It considers Jonson's pencil annotations on a copy of Thomas More's Carmen Gratulatorium (1509), to which his own poem is greatly indebted, and shows that these annotations are often made beside lines concerned with noise.
Jonson's acoustic theory – which is dependent on an early modern understanding of the voice and of breath – is then traced throughout three of his comedies (Volpone, The Alchemist, and Epicoene).
The article finally considers the responses of early readers of Jonson's dramatic work and their engagement with his sonic stage directions in Epicoene.
It concludes that Jonson equivocates about the importance of sound, dismissing such “noise” only to discuss it at length in the next breath.
Related Results
Funkcije komunikacijski relevantne šutnje u njemačkome
Funkcije komunikacijski relevantne šutnje u njemačkome
Additionally, this chapter presents research of silence with review of main aspects of papers in the field of conversational analysis, ethnography of communication and metaphor of ...
Ben Jonson on Father Thomas Wright
Ben Jonson on Father Thomas Wright
This article reassesses Ben Jonson's relationship to the Roman-Catholic priest and missionary Thomas Wright (c. 1561–1623). Wright plays two roles in critical accounts of Jonson's ...
Expressive Silence in the Poetry of Keats and Clare
Expressive Silence in the Poetry of Keats and Clare
This thesis seeks to show how silence is inherent to the poetic expression of John Keats (1795
– 1821) and John Clare (1793 – 1894). It attends to specific allusions to silences an...
Judging Jonson: Ben Jonson's Satirical Self-Defense in Poetaster
Judging Jonson: Ben Jonson's Satirical Self-Defense in Poetaster
This essay argues that Ben Jonson's antagonism with his audience in the comical satires was at least in part related to his translation of the satirist to the theater. Whereas prin...
THE PERFORMANCE OF SILENCE IN EARLY CHINA: THE YANZI CHUNQIU AND BEYOND
THE PERFORMANCE OF SILENCE IN EARLY CHINA: THE YANZI CHUNQIU AND BEYOND
AbstractThis article looks beyond the dichotomy between silence (mo 默) and speech (yan 言) and discusses the functions of and attitudes toward silence in the Yanzi chunqiu 晏子春秋 as a...
Against Stanley Fish on Ben Jonson and the Community of the Same
Against Stanley Fish on Ben Jonson and the Community of the Same
In his classic essay “Authors-Readers: Ben Jonson and the Community of the Same,” Stanley Fish argues, primarily on the basis of a series of close readings, that (1) Jonson's poetr...
“Are all diseases dead”: The Likelihood of an Attribution to Ben Jonson
“Are all diseases dead”: The Likelihood of an Attribution to Ben Jonson
Arents S288 (Acc. No. 5442), pp. 87–88, and Rosenbach 239/27, p. 327, attribute the poem that begins “Are all diseases dead nor will death say” to Ben Jonson. While A.S.W. Rosenbac...
Jonson and Performance
Jonson and Performance
Abstract
For Una Ellis-Fermor, there is a ‘deeply inherent non-dramatic principle’ in the drama of Ben Jonson, a fundamental dislike of theatricality, and a pursu...

