Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Human spindle variability
View through CrossRef
Abstract
In humans, sleep spindles are 10-16 Hz oscillations lasting approximately 0.5-2 s. Spindles, along with cortical slow oscillations, facilitate memory consolidation by enabling synaptic plasticity. Early recordings of spindles at the scalp found anterior channels had overall slower frequency than central-posterior channels. This robust, topographical finding led to dichotomizing spindles as ‘slow’ versus ‘fast’, modelled as two distinct spindle generators in frontal versus posterior cortex. Using a large dataset of intracranial sEEG recordings (n=20, 365 bipolar recordings), we show that the difference in spindle frequency between frontal and parietal channels is comparable to the variability in spindle frequency within the course of individual spindles, across different spindles recorded by a given site, and across sites within a given region. Thus, fast and slow spindles only capture average differences that obscure a much larger underlying overlap in frequency. Furthermore, differences in mean frequency are only one of several ways that spindles differ. For example, compared to parietal, frontal spindles are smaller, tend to occur after parietal when both are engaged, and show a larger decrease in frequency within-spindles. However, frontal and parietal spindles are similar in being longer, less variable, and more widespread than occipital, temporal, and Rolandic spindles. These characteristics are accentuated in spindles which are highly phase-locked to posterior hippocampal spindles. We propose that rather than a strict parietal-fast/frontal-slow dichotomy, spindles differ continuously and quasi-independently in multiple dimensions, with variability due about equally to within-spindle, within-region and between-region factors.
Significance Statement
Sleep spindles are 10-16 Hz neural oscillations generated by cortico-thalamic circuits that promote memory consolidation. Spindles are often dichotomized into slow-anterior and fast-posterior categories for cognitive and clinical studies. Here, we show that the anterior-posterior difference in spindle frequency is comparable to that observed between different cycles of individual spindles, between spindles from a given site, or from different sites within a region. Further, we show that spindles vary on other dimensions such as duration, amplitude, spread, primacy and consistency, and that these multiple dimensions vary continuously and largely independently across cortical regions. These findings suggest that multiple continuous variables rather than a strict frequency dichotomy may be more useful biomarkers for memory consolidation or psychiatric disorders.
Title: Human spindle variability
Description:
Abstract
In humans, sleep spindles are 10-16 Hz oscillations lasting approximately 0.
5-2 s.
Spindles, along with cortical slow oscillations, facilitate memory consolidation by enabling synaptic plasticity.
Early recordings of spindles at the scalp found anterior channels had overall slower frequency than central-posterior channels.
This robust, topographical finding led to dichotomizing spindles as ‘slow’ versus ‘fast’, modelled as two distinct spindle generators in frontal versus posterior cortex.
Using a large dataset of intracranial sEEG recordings (n=20, 365 bipolar recordings), we show that the difference in spindle frequency between frontal and parietal channels is comparable to the variability in spindle frequency within the course of individual spindles, across different spindles recorded by a given site, and across sites within a given region.
Thus, fast and slow spindles only capture average differences that obscure a much larger underlying overlap in frequency.
Furthermore, differences in mean frequency are only one of several ways that spindles differ.
For example, compared to parietal, frontal spindles are smaller, tend to occur after parietal when both are engaged, and show a larger decrease in frequency within-spindles.
However, frontal and parietal spindles are similar in being longer, less variable, and more widespread than occipital, temporal, and Rolandic spindles.
These characteristics are accentuated in spindles which are highly phase-locked to posterior hippocampal spindles.
We propose that rather than a strict parietal-fast/frontal-slow dichotomy, spindles differ continuously and quasi-independently in multiple dimensions, with variability due about equally to within-spindle, within-region and between-region factors.
Significance Statement
Sleep spindles are 10-16 Hz neural oscillations generated by cortico-thalamic circuits that promote memory consolidation.
Spindles are often dichotomized into slow-anterior and fast-posterior categories for cognitive and clinical studies.
Here, we show that the anterior-posterior difference in spindle frequency is comparable to that observed between different cycles of individual spindles, between spindles from a given site, or from different sites within a region.
Further, we show that spindles vary on other dimensions such as duration, amplitude, spread, primacy and consistency, and that these multiple dimensions vary continuously and largely independently across cortical regions.
These findings suggest that multiple continuous variables rather than a strict frequency dichotomy may be more useful biomarkers for memory consolidation or psychiatric disorders.
Related Results
A Comparison of Spindle Activity Measurements: Automated Spindle Detection Helps Distinguish Changes in Spindle Activity
A Comparison of Spindle Activity Measurements: Automated Spindle Detection Helps Distinguish Changes in Spindle Activity
Abstract
Study Objectives.
Sleep spindle activity is commonly estimated by measuring sigma power during stage 2 non-rapid eye movement (NREM2) sleep. However, spindles acc...
An examination of sleep spindle metrics in the Sleep Heart Health Study: superiority of automated spindle detection over total sigma power in assessing spindle activity
An examination of sleep spindle metrics in the Sleep Heart Health Study: superiority of automated spindle detection over total sigma power in assessing spindle activity
Abstract
Background. Sleep spindle activity is commonly estimated by measuring sigma power during stage 2 non-rapid eye movement (NREM2) sleep. However, spindles account fo...
Microtubule pivoting driven by spindle elongation rescues polar chromosomes to ensure faithful mitosis
Microtubule pivoting driven by spindle elongation rescues polar chromosomes to ensure faithful mitosis
Abstract
Polar chromosomes represent a subset of ~7 chromosomes in human cells that initially attach to the mitotic spindle behind the spindle pole. These chromosom...
NuSAP1 promotes bipolar spindle assembly in
Trypanosoma brucei
by bundling spindle microtubules
NuSAP1 promotes bipolar spindle assembly in
Trypanosoma brucei
by bundling spindle microtubules
Abstract
The parasitic protozoan
Trypanosoma brucei
assembles a bipolar mitotic spindle and undergoes a close...
Dynein contributes to spindle elongation during anaphase in
Candida albicans
Dynein contributes to spindle elongation during anaphase in
Candida albicans
Abstract
Budding yeast must position the mitotic spindle at the mother-bud junction during anaphase to ensure proper chromosome ...
SWR1 Chromatin Remodeling Complex Prevents Mitotic Slippage during Spindle Position Checkpoint Arrest
SWR1 Chromatin Remodeling Complex Prevents Mitotic Slippage during Spindle Position Checkpoint Arrest
ABSTRACT
Faithful chromosome segregation in budding yeast requires correct positioning of the mitotic spindle along the mother to daughter cell polarity axis. When ...
Sleep spindle maturation enhances slow oscillation-spindle coupling
Sleep spindle maturation enhances slow oscillation-spindle coupling
Abstract
The synchronization of canonical fast sleep spindle activity (12.5-16 Hz) precisely during the slow oscillation up peak is considered an essential feature ...
Mapping load-bearing in the mammalian spindle reveals local kinetochore-fiber anchorage that provides mechanical isolation and redundancy
Mapping load-bearing in the mammalian spindle reveals local kinetochore-fiber anchorage that provides mechanical isolation and redundancy
Summary
Active forces generated at kinetochores move chromosomes, and the dynamic spindle must robustly anchor kinetochore-fibers (k-fibers) to bear this load. We k...

