Javascript must be enabled to continue!
(Re)labeling
View through CrossRef
A new theory of labeling that sheds light on such syntactic phenomena as relativization, successive cyclicity, island phenomena, and Minimality effects.
When two categories merge and a new syntactic object is formed, what determines which of the two merged categories transmits its properties one level up—or, in current terminology, which of the two initial categories labels the new object? In (Re)labeling, Carlo Cecchetto and Caterina Donati take this question as the starting point of an investigation that sheds light on longstanding puzzles in the theory of syntax in the generative tradition. They put forward a simple idea: that words are special because they can provide a label for free when they merge with some other category. Crucially, this happens even when a word merges with another category as a result of syntactic movement. This means that a word has a “relabeling” power in that the structure resulting from its movement can have a different label from the one that the structure previously had. Cecchetto and Donati argue that relabeling cases triggered by the movement of a word are pervasive in the syntax of natural languages and that their identification sheds light on such phenomena as relativization, explaining for free why relatives clauses have a nominal distribution, successive cyclicity, island effects, root phenomena, and Minimality effects.
Title: (Re)labeling
Description:
A new theory of labeling that sheds light on such syntactic phenomena as relativization, successive cyclicity, island phenomena, and Minimality effects.
When two categories merge and a new syntactic object is formed, what determines which of the two merged categories transmits its properties one level up—or, in current terminology, which of the two initial categories labels the new object? In (Re)labeling, Carlo Cecchetto and Caterina Donati take this question as the starting point of an investigation that sheds light on longstanding puzzles in the theory of syntax in the generative tradition.
They put forward a simple idea: that words are special because they can provide a label for free when they merge with some other category.
Crucially, this happens even when a word merges with another category as a result of syntactic movement.
This means that a word has a “relabeling” power in that the structure resulting from its movement can have a different label from the one that the structure previously had.
Cecchetto and Donati argue that relabeling cases triggered by the movement of a word are pervasive in the syntax of natural languages and that their identification sheds light on such phenomena as relativization, explaining for free why relatives clauses have a nominal distribution, successive cyclicity, island effects, root phenomena, and Minimality effects.
Related Results
Protocol for antigen labeling in eukaryotic cells and quantification by flow cytometry v1
Protocol for antigen labeling in eukaryotic cells and quantification by flow cytometry v1
Goal: This document aims to standardize the protocol used for labeling intracellular or extracellular antigens in eukaryotic cells, using antibodies already associated with fluoroc...
Programmatic Labeling of Dark Data for Artificial Intelligence in Spatial Informatics
Programmatic Labeling of Dark Data for Artificial Intelligence in Spatial Informatics
<p>Data preparation process generally consumes up to 80% of the Data Scientists time, with 60% of that being attributed to cleaning and labeling data.[1]&#160...
Functionalized polysaccharides improve sensitivity of tyramide/peroxidase proximity labeling assays through electrostatic interactions
Functionalized polysaccharides improve sensitivity of tyramide/peroxidase proximity labeling assays through electrostatic interactions
High-throughput assays that efficiently link genotype and phenotype with high fidelity are key to successful enzyme engineering campaigns. Among these assays, the tyramide/peroxida...
Competitiveness Assessment of Tonic Drinks Labeling
Competitiveness Assessment of Tonic Drinks Labeling
Labeling of alcoholic-free tonic beverages (AFTB) is an important element in the quality
indicators system. Not all manufacturers, unfortunately, provide reliable information regar...
Mass Spectrometry of Peptides and Proteins
Mass Spectrometry of Peptides and Proteins
Abstract
Originally published in: Proteomics in Drug Research. Edited by Michael Hamacher, Katrin Marcus, Kai Stühler, André van Hall, Bettina Warscheid and Helmut E. Mey...
k-super cube root cube mean labeling of graphs
k-super cube root cube mean labeling of graphs
Consider a graph G with |V (G)| = p and |E(G)| = q and let f : V (G) → {k, k + 1, k + 2, . . . p + q + k − 1}} be an injective function. The induced edge labeling f ∗ for a vertex ...
Perbandingan Performa Labeling Lexicon InSet dan VADER pada Analisa Sentimen Rohingya di Aplikasi X dengan SVM
Perbandingan Performa Labeling Lexicon InSet dan VADER pada Analisa Sentimen Rohingya di Aplikasi X dengan SVM
Rohingya in Indonesia has become trending conversation on social media. Sentiment analysis can get public responds. Big data makes the problem time efficiency labeling process, the...
3-Equitable Ceiling Average Labeling
3-Equitable Ceiling Average Labeling
Let T = (V, E) represent a graph where V is the set of vertices and E is the set of edges. Consider a labeling of the vertices f : V(T)→{0,1,2, ….., n-1} such that each edge e=uv i...

