Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Competitiveness Assessment of Tonic Drinks Labeling
View through CrossRef
Labeling of alcoholic-free tonic beverages (AFTB) is an important element in the quality
indicators system. Not all manufacturers, unfortunately, provide reliable information regarding
the possible adverse effects of its use, or even hide data on low-quality products.
There is a need for high-quality information AFTB support in the form of properly designed
labeling, which facilitates the buyer choice while purchasing. The research purpose is to assess
the labeling competitiveness of tonic drinks sold in the Kemerovo market. The study
object is AFTB labeling: Drive, Tornado Energy Ice, E-ON Citrus Punch, Adrenaline Rush,
Gorilla, Flash up. Research methods are visual product packaging inspection, registration
method, expert assessments method (determining the weight coefficients), calculation
method. First of all, researchers developed an evaluation algorithm. Points number detailing
was due to the available additional information about the products safety. A man
assessed labeling according to consumer criteria in keeping with the previously developed
scale; while labeling according to group consumer criteria considering the weighting coefficients
determined via the expert assessments method by ranking the previous studies
results. The AFTB assessment was according to four criteria considering given score scale.
Labeling of the tonic beverage Drive deserved the highest score (19.5 scores), Flash Up
got the smallest (16.8 scores). Uncompetitive beverages in economic terms are Adrenaline
Rush (1.048 scores), E-ON Citrus Punch (1.167 scores) and Flash Up (1.670 scores). The
authors determined integral indicators and the competitiveness level of AFTB labeling.
According to the obtained results, Tornado Energy Ice and Adrenaline Rush rated the 1st
class competitiveness, Drive – the 2nd class, E-ON Citrus Punch, Gorilla and Flash Up – the
4th class. According to the economic criterion, these samples received minimal scores, that
characterized it as uncompetitive in this parameter. The paper contains the recommendations
for manufacturers to improve the quality and tonic beverages competitiveness
Ural State University of Economics
Title: Competitiveness Assessment of Tonic Drinks Labeling
Description:
Labeling of alcoholic-free tonic beverages (AFTB) is an important element in the quality
indicators system.
Not all manufacturers, unfortunately, provide reliable information regarding
the possible adverse effects of its use, or even hide data on low-quality products.
There is a need for high-quality information AFTB support in the form of properly designed
labeling, which facilitates the buyer choice while purchasing.
The research purpose is to assess
the labeling competitiveness of tonic drinks sold in the Kemerovo market.
The study
object is AFTB labeling: Drive, Tornado Energy Ice, E-ON Citrus Punch, Adrenaline Rush,
Gorilla, Flash up.
Research methods are visual product packaging inspection, registration
method, expert assessments method (determining the weight coefficients), calculation
method.
First of all, researchers developed an evaluation algorithm.
Points number detailing
was due to the available additional information about the products safety.
A man
assessed labeling according to consumer criteria in keeping with the previously developed
scale; while labeling according to group consumer criteria considering the weighting coefficients
determined via the expert assessments method by ranking the previous studies
results.
The AFTB assessment was according to four criteria considering given score scale.
Labeling of the tonic beverage Drive deserved the highest score (19.
5 scores), Flash Up
got the smallest (16.
8 scores).
Uncompetitive beverages in economic terms are Adrenaline
Rush (1.
048 scores), E-ON Citrus Punch (1.
167 scores) and Flash Up (1.
670 scores).
The
authors determined integral indicators and the competitiveness level of AFTB labeling.
According to the obtained results, Tornado Energy Ice and Adrenaline Rush rated the 1st
class competitiveness, Drive – the 2nd class, E-ON Citrus Punch, Gorilla and Flash Up – the
4th class.
According to the economic criterion, these samples received minimal scores, that
characterized it as uncompetitive in this parameter.
The paper contains the recommendations
for manufacturers to improve the quality and tonic beverages competitiveness.
Related Results
Young people, alcohol, and designer drinks: quantitative and qualitative study
Young people, alcohol, and designer drinks: quantitative and qualitative study
Abstract
Objective:
To examine the appeal of “designer drinks” to young people.
...
Evaluation of Drinks Contribution to Energy Intake in Summer and Winter
Evaluation of Drinks Contribution to Energy Intake in Summer and Winter
All drinks hydrate and most also provide nutrients and energy. Our objective was to evaluate the contribution of drinks to total energy intake in summer and winter. Data were obtai...
Young consumers' views of infused soft drinks innovation
Young consumers' views of infused soft drinks innovation
PurposeThis study has two aims: first, to develop a conceptual model for infused drinks innovation using the subjective norm and lifestyle as predictors; and second, to adapt the b...
Sugar Content, Acidity and Effect on Plaque pH of Fruit Juices, Fruit Drinks, Carbonated Beverages and Sport Drinks
Sugar Content, Acidity and Effect on Plaque pH of Fruit Juices, Fruit Drinks, Carbonated Beverages and Sport Drinks
The concentration of fructose, glucose and sucrose, the pH and the titratable amount of acid were analyzed in the following groups of soft drinks (8–11 samples per group): (1) frui...
Application of HPLC Coupled with a Charged Aerosol Detector to the Evaluation of Fructose, Glucose, Sucrose, and Inositol Levels in Fruit Juices, Energy Drinks, Sports Drinks, and Soft Drinks
Application of HPLC Coupled with a Charged Aerosol Detector to the Evaluation of Fructose, Glucose, Sucrose, and Inositol Levels in Fruit Juices, Energy Drinks, Sports Drinks, and Soft Drinks
The study aimed to estimate the levels of fructose, glucose, sucrose, and inositol levels in sweetened beverages with a newly developed method using HPLC coupled with a charged aer...
The Possible Impact of Different Pack Sizes of Carbonated Soft Drinks on Sugar Intake in Nigeria
The Possible Impact of Different Pack Sizes of Carbonated Soft Drinks on Sugar Intake in Nigeria
Background : According to WHO, in 2022, 16% of adults and 8% of children and adolescents globally were living with obesity. In Nigeria, the adult obesity prevalence was around 15%....
Energy Drink Consumption by Online College Students
Energy Drink Consumption by Online College Students
Sales of energy drinks have increased over the last several decades, and now it is a billion dollar industry. Who purchases and consumes these beverages? Current marketing campaign...
STRATEGY FOR MANAGING REGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS DEVELOPMENT
STRATEGY FOR MANAGING REGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS DEVELOPMENT
Abstract. The studies of economists are mostly devoted to the issues of ensuring the proper level of competitiveness of the country and finding ways to increase Ukraine's competiti...

