Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Epistemology

View through CrossRef
Epistemology is the branch of philosophy concerned with the study of knowledge, with knowledge traditionally defined as justified true belief. Classical epistemology set up a dualism between the mind and a material reality external to the mind. The problem to solve then became that of explaining how ideas in the mind could be known to mirror objects outside the mind. For the rationalist tradition, the solution to this problem lay in arguing that the mind had a priori ideas, meaning ideas that existed independently of experience. For the empiricist tradition, the solution to this problem lay in arguing that the mind had a posteriori ideas, meaning ideas stemming from experience or, more precisely, sense data inputs. Alternative positions could adhere to some form of idealism or skepticism. With idealism, reality becomes defined in terms of our ideas of it, and with skepticism it is held that knowledge cannot be attained because we can never know if our ideas mirror objects outside our minds. Later, philosophical attention turned from the issue of discussing whether or not ideas in the mind could mirror objects outside the mind to language. Debates then ensued about whether truth was a matter of correspondence between a statement and a fact. Philosophers concerned with scientific knowledge addressed the issue of what method defined science. For many, there could be a sociology of error but not a sociology of knowledge. What this meant was that while a diligent application of the scientific method would explain the production of truth, error could be explained by “social factors” distorting this process. Examples of social factors could be religious or political commitments. In sociology, epistemology is not a clearly defined topic. Instead, there are a broad range of issues, which may be summarized with the following questions: Should sociology seek scientific knowledge and, if so, how is science to be defined? Can qualitative research give explanatory knowledge of relations of cause and effect as well as quantitative research? Should sociology reject any attempt to explain relations of cause and effect, on the basis that social reality does not have law-like phenomena, in order to understand the shared meanings of agents? How can theoretical abstractions be justified? Should sociologists adopt a broad definition of knowledge to include agents’ understanding of the social and political world, irrespective of whether agents’ beliefs are actually true? Should all domains of knowledge, including the knowledge produced by the natural sciences, be regarded as influenced by sociocultural factors or even completely relative to the prevailing sociohistorical environment? Should value judgments influence the production and dissemination of sociological knowledge? Has sociological knowledge contributed to the reproduction of inequalities by ignoring women and using a research process that is ultimately hierarchical and oppressive? Is a canon of classical texts of any intellectual use for the production of contemporary sociological knowledge? In other words, the issues concerning epistemology in sociology pertain to the status and range of sociological knowledge.
Oxford University Press
Title: Epistemology
Description:
Epistemology is the branch of philosophy concerned with the study of knowledge, with knowledge traditionally defined as justified true belief.
Classical epistemology set up a dualism between the mind and a material reality external to the mind.
The problem to solve then became that of explaining how ideas in the mind could be known to mirror objects outside the mind.
For the rationalist tradition, the solution to this problem lay in arguing that the mind had a priori ideas, meaning ideas that existed independently of experience.
For the empiricist tradition, the solution to this problem lay in arguing that the mind had a posteriori ideas, meaning ideas stemming from experience or, more precisely, sense data inputs.
Alternative positions could adhere to some form of idealism or skepticism.
With idealism, reality becomes defined in terms of our ideas of it, and with skepticism it is held that knowledge cannot be attained because we can never know if our ideas mirror objects outside our minds.
Later, philosophical attention turned from the issue of discussing whether or not ideas in the mind could mirror objects outside the mind to language.
Debates then ensued about whether truth was a matter of correspondence between a statement and a fact.
Philosophers concerned with scientific knowledge addressed the issue of what method defined science.
For many, there could be a sociology of error but not a sociology of knowledge.
What this meant was that while a diligent application of the scientific method would explain the production of truth, error could be explained by “social factors” distorting this process.
Examples of social factors could be religious or political commitments.
In sociology, epistemology is not a clearly defined topic.
Instead, there are a broad range of issues, which may be summarized with the following questions: Should sociology seek scientific knowledge and, if so, how is science to be defined? Can qualitative research give explanatory knowledge of relations of cause and effect as well as quantitative research? Should sociology reject any attempt to explain relations of cause and effect, on the basis that social reality does not have law-like phenomena, in order to understand the shared meanings of agents? How can theoretical abstractions be justified? Should sociologists adopt a broad definition of knowledge to include agents’ understanding of the social and political world, irrespective of whether agents’ beliefs are actually true? Should all domains of knowledge, including the knowledge produced by the natural sciences, be regarded as influenced by sociocultural factors or even completely relative to the prevailing sociohistorical environment? Should value judgments influence the production and dissemination of sociological knowledge? Has sociological knowledge contributed to the reproduction of inequalities by ignoring women and using a research process that is ultimately hierarchical and oppressive? Is a canon of classical texts of any intellectual use for the production of contemporary sociological knowledge? In other words, the issues concerning epistemology in sociology pertain to the status and range of sociological knowledge.

Related Results

Oxford Studies in Epistemology Volume 7
Oxford Studies in Epistemology Volume 7
Abstract Oxford Studies in Epistemology is a biennial journal offering a regular snapshot of state-of-the-art work in this important field. Under the guidance of a d...
Oxford Studies In Epistemology
Oxford Studies In Epistemology
Abstract Oxford Studies in Epistemology is a biennial publicaton which offers a regular snapshot of state-of-the-art work in this important field. Under the guidance...
Social epistemology
Social epistemology
Social epistemology encompasses the study of the social dimensions of knowledge acquisition and transmission (Palermos and Pritchard 2013), the evaluation of beliefs and belief-for...
Metaepistemology
Metaepistemology
Metaepistemology may be partly characterized as the study of the nature, aims, methods and legitimacy of epistemology. Given such a characterization, most epistemological views and...
Epistemology and Knowledge Management
Epistemology and Knowledge Management
This article surveys and explores the relationship between epistemology and knowledge management (KM). Epistemology is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature and extent...
Epistemology and Knowledge Management
Epistemology and Knowledge Management
This article surveys and explores the relationship between epistemology and knowledge management (KM). Epistemology is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature and extent...
Epistemology and Knowledge Management
Epistemology and Knowledge Management
This article surveys and explores the relationship between epistemology and knowledge management (KM). Epistemology is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature and extent...
An Aristotelian Critique to Contemporary Virtue Epistemology
An Aristotelian Critique to Contemporary Virtue Epistemology
This paper aims to offer an Aristotelian critique of virtue epistemology, particularly of the way virtue epistemologists use the concept of intellectual virtue in their definitions...

Back to Top