Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Paternalistic Leadership Profiles

View through CrossRef
Paternalistic leadership (PL) is a multidimensional construct of three elements that together form a profile model consisting of authoritarianism, benevolence, and morality. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was employed to analyze subordinate response profiles of 1,146 platoon leaders who rated their company commanders in the Taiwanese military. Results indicated the prevalence of three leadership profiles: most common was a moral-authoritarian leadership profile (60.1%), followed by a moral-benevolent leadership profile (29.1%). Least prevalent was an authoritarian leadership profile (10.8%) low on both morality and benevolence. The probability of subordinate responses fitting in the moral-benevolent leadership profile was associated with greater supervisor identification, more occupational commitment, better task performance, and lower intention to leave; probability of subordinate responses fitting the authoritarian profile was associated with greater intention to leave. There was considerable variability in leadership profile perceptions for the same company commander rated by different subordinates.
Title: Paternalistic Leadership Profiles
Description:
Paternalistic leadership (PL) is a multidimensional construct of three elements that together form a profile model consisting of authoritarianism, benevolence, and morality.
Latent profile analysis (LPA) was employed to analyze subordinate response profiles of 1,146 platoon leaders who rated their company commanders in the Taiwanese military.
Results indicated the prevalence of three leadership profiles: most common was a moral-authoritarian leadership profile (60.
1%), followed by a moral-benevolent leadership profile (29.
1%).
Least prevalent was an authoritarian leadership profile (10.
8%) low on both morality and benevolence.
The probability of subordinate responses fitting in the moral-benevolent leadership profile was associated with greater supervisor identification, more occupational commitment, better task performance, and lower intention to leave; probability of subordinate responses fitting the authoritarian profile was associated with greater intention to leave.
There was considerable variability in leadership profile perceptions for the same company commander rated by different subordinates.

Related Results

Paradigm warriors: Advancing a radical ecosystems view of collective leadership from an Indigenous Māori perspective
Paradigm warriors: Advancing a radical ecosystems view of collective leadership from an Indigenous Māori perspective
Collective leadership is cast as a new and emerging paradigm. However, for many Indigenous communities, collective leadership has been a way of life through the millennia. Where ma...
Relational leadership
Relational leadership
This article aims to extend contemporary work on relational leadership theory by conceptualizing leadership as embedded in the everyday relationally-responsive dialogical practices...
David Cameron’s leadership and party renewal
David Cameron’s leadership and party renewal
The chapter explores the relationship between David Cameron’s leadership and Conservative Party renewal. It argues that both Cameron’s leadership, and the understanding of the proc...
Guest Editors’ Introduction: Philosophical Contributions to Leadership Ethics
Guest Editors’ Introduction: Philosophical Contributions to Leadership Ethics
ABSTRACT:This article introduces the first of two special issues on philosophical approaches to leadership ethics. In it, we show some of the ways that philosophy contributes to th...
STRATEGI MOTIVASI KEPEMIMPINAN DI SDN 3 KAWO, KECAMATAN PUJUT, LOMBOK TENGAH
STRATEGI MOTIVASI KEPEMIMPINAN DI SDN 3 KAWO, KECAMATAN PUJUT, LOMBOK TENGAH
This article discusses motivational leadership that is critical to organizational development and progress. Leaders who have a charismatic attitude, are able to provide inspiration...
Dialectics of leadership
Dialectics of leadership
Mainstream leadership studies tend to privilege and separate leaders from followers. This article highlights the value of rethinking leadership as a set of dialectical relationship...
Eupsychian Versus Authoritarian Leadership: Existential–Humanistic Underpinnings and Empirical Support
Eupsychian Versus Authoritarian Leadership: Existential–Humanistic Underpinnings and Empirical Support
This article surveys Maslow’s views on eupsychian leadership and how his vision of eupsychia may be regarded as a contemporary expression of the Greek philosophical notion of the G...
Gender role, decision style and leadership style
Gender role, decision style and leadership style
Notes that previous researchers have investigated the relationship between gender role (i.e. sex‐role identity) and leadership style, and they also have investigated the relationsh...

Back to Top