Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Istoria ca o poveste: Istoria Imperiului Otoman de Cantemir
View through CrossRef
A part of European culture since the 18th century, the “History of the Ottoman Empire” of
Dimitrie Cantemir calls for a new reading, especially since the erudite historian Virgil
Cândea discovered its original manuscript, which scholars have long sought.
Beyond the historiographical value of the work as documentation and critical wit, its clear
and flowing “story-like” writing illustrates the indissoluble link between history and
storytelling mentioned by Paul Ricœur. It is easier to understand why, thanks to this
condition, it did not pose too complicated problems of translation, easing the effort of
translators and offering itself to 18th-century (and later) readers as an instructive and
enjoyable read. The criticism came especially from the angle of scholarship with the
development of the critical spirit in historiography in the 19th century and the formation of
new generations of scholars specializing in Ottoman studies. However, while Cantemir’s
history of the Ottomans has given way to other later works as documentation and analysis,
it retains the same interest as a narrative discourse, the mark of time contributing no less to
its fascination.
Editura Universitatii Alexandru Ioan Cuza din Iasi
Title: Istoria ca o poveste: Istoria Imperiului Otoman de Cantemir
Description:
A part of European culture since the 18th century, the “History of the Ottoman Empire” of
Dimitrie Cantemir calls for a new reading, especially since the erudite historian Virgil
Cândea discovered its original manuscript, which scholars have long sought.
Beyond the historiographical value of the work as documentation and critical wit, its clear
and flowing “story-like” writing illustrates the indissoluble link between history and
storytelling mentioned by Paul Ricœur.
It is easier to understand why, thanks to this
condition, it did not pose too complicated problems of translation, easing the effort of
translators and offering itself to 18th-century (and later) readers as an instructive and
enjoyable read.
The criticism came especially from the angle of scholarship with the
development of the critical spirit in historiography in the 19th century and the formation of
new generations of scholars specializing in Ottoman studies.
However, while Cantemir’s
history of the Ottomans has given way to other later works as documentation and analysis,
it retains the same interest as a narrative discourse, the mark of time contributing no less to
its fascination.
Related Results
Prose Translation of Justin’s “History” by Antiochus Cantemir
Prose Translation of Justin’s “History” by Antiochus Cantemir
The article presents an analysis of Antioch Cantemir’s Russian translation of the historical work of Marcus Junianus Justinus, written in Latin. In the first part of the article, w...
The Christian Dimension of Prince Dimitrie Cantemir and Interreligious Vision
The Christian Dimension of Prince Dimitrie Cantemir and Interreligious Vision
Dimitrie Cantemir, Prince of Moldavia, left a remarkable imprint on its history and religion, exerting a profound influence on future research. With a diplomatic approach and eclec...
Dimitrie Cantemir de la un centenar la altul
Dimitrie Cantemir de la un centenar la altul
Occasioned by the proclamation of the Year of Cantemir, the present study aims to follow how the knowledge of Dimitrie Cantemir’s work has been reconfigured from one century to ano...
Mitul demistificarii
Mitul demistificarii
Secolul 21 este un secol ce nu trebuie izolat, analizat disparat, dus spre un viitor incert, optimist sau pesimist, asteptat sau anticipat. Acest secol, ca si predecesoarele sale,...
Francis Bacon, Jan Baptist Van Helmont and Demetrius Cantemir. Family resemblances of auctoritas in Early Modern Europe
Francis Bacon, Jan Baptist Van Helmont and Demetrius Cantemir. Family resemblances of auctoritas in Early Modern Europe
The present paper stakes out the destiny of certain ideas on scientific methods and epistemic and ontological representations that spread in 17th century Europe like a cultural epi...
Approches roumaines de l'histoire ottomane
Approches roumaines de l'histoire ottomane
Stefan Lemmy : Rumanian studies of Ottoman History.
This article shows how the dominating political presence of the Sultan in the Rumanian past influenced their historians' a...
Histoires parallèles: Démétrius Cantemir et François II Rákóczi
Histoires parallèles: Démétrius Cantemir et François II Rákóczi
In the wake of the work aimed at comparing Demetrius Cantemir (1673?–1723) with various
outstanding political and cultural personalities, this study proposes a comparative lecture...
Dimitrie Cantemir – Magister Musicae
Dimitrie Cantemir – Magister Musicae
Prince Dimitrie Cantemir remains in international historiography a prominent promoter of universal culture, generating specialized research on his works. Humanist by polymath profi...

