Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Use of patient‐controlled analgesia in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy
View through CrossRef
Objective To assess the advantages of patient‐controlled analgesia (PCA) in patients undergoing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for urinary stones.Patients and methods Between December 1995 and May 1996, a prospective study was carried out on 100 patients who underwent ESWL for urinary stones. The patients were assigned to two equal groups, one receiving PCA and the other pethidine (control). Patients in the PCA group self‐administered varying doses of intravenous alfentanil according to their pain tolerance, while those in the control group were given a single bolus dose of 1 mg/kg body weight intravenous pethidine by the attending urologist before the start of the procedure. The stone site, maximum energy level achieved, number of shock waves given, duration of procedure, pain scores, patient tolerance and acceptance were recorded to assess the efficacy of PCA compared with analgesia controlled by the physician.Results Both groups were matched for age, body weight, stone location and number of shocks given. The PCA group received a mean of 1.03 mg alfentanil while the control group received a mean of 62.5 mg pethidine. The maximum discharge voltage of 16 kV was achieved in all but one patient (98%) in the PCA group whereas only 21 patients (42%) in the control group attained this level. The mean treatment duration was less in the PCA group (32.8 min) than in the control group (44.5 min), the mean pain score lower (3.76 and 4.62, respectively) and the incidence of nausea and vomiting much less (22% and 60%, respectively). In addition, all 21 patients in the PCA group who had received intravenous pethidine during previous sessions of ESWL chose PCA as the better form of analgesia. There were no adverse effects in the PCA group except for one patient whose arterial oxygen saturation decreased transiently.Conclusion PCA enables the urologist to achieve better patient compliance through better pain control; its application has maximized the use of lithotripsy and the patients’ acceptability for this form of analgesia is confirmed. We recommend that this form of analgesia be used for ESWL.
Title: Use of patient‐controlled analgesia in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy
Description:
Objective To assess the advantages of patient‐controlled analgesia (PCA) in patients undergoing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for urinary stones.
Patients and methods Between December 1995 and May 1996, a prospective study was carried out on 100 patients who underwent ESWL for urinary stones.
The patients were assigned to two equal groups, one receiving PCA and the other pethidine (control).
Patients in the PCA group self‐administered varying doses of intravenous alfentanil according to their pain tolerance, while those in the control group were given a single bolus dose of 1 mg/kg body weight intravenous pethidine by the attending urologist before the start of the procedure.
The stone site, maximum energy level achieved, number of shock waves given, duration of procedure, pain scores, patient tolerance and acceptance were recorded to assess the efficacy of PCA compared with analgesia controlled by the physician.
Results Both groups were matched for age, body weight, stone location and number of shocks given.
The PCA group received a mean of 1.
03 mg alfentanil while the control group received a mean of 62.
5 mg pethidine.
The maximum discharge voltage of 16 kV was achieved in all but one patient (98%) in the PCA group whereas only 21 patients (42%) in the control group attained this level.
The mean treatment duration was less in the PCA group (32.
8 min) than in the control group (44.
5 min), the mean pain score lower (3.
76 and 4.
62, respectively) and the incidence of nausea and vomiting much less (22% and 60%, respectively).
In addition, all 21 patients in the PCA group who had received intravenous pethidine during previous sessions of ESWL chose PCA as the better form of analgesia.
There were no adverse effects in the PCA group except for one patient whose arterial oxygen saturation decreased transiently.
Conclusion PCA enables the urologist to achieve better patient compliance through better pain control; its application has maximized the use of lithotripsy and the patients’ acceptability for this form of analgesia is confirmed.
We recommend that this form of analgesia be used for ESWL.
Related Results
Outcome Of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (Eswl) Of Lower Ureteric Stones
Outcome Of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (Eswl) Of Lower Ureteric Stones
Urolithiasis is a prevailing urological condition, with ureteric stones affecting around 22% of cases, mostly causing severe pain and other complications. Surveillance, medical the...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Factors Affecting the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Urinary Stone Treatment
Factors Affecting the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Urinary Stone Treatment
Background and aim: The recurrence of urinary stones occurs in two thirds of patients within a 20-year period, making urinary stones a common pathology. Among urology pathologies, ...
The use of an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) in the evaluation of the Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (ESWL) as a treatment of choise for urinary lithiasis
The use of an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) in the evaluation of the Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (ESWL) as a treatment of choise for urinary lithiasis
PurposeArtificial Neural Networks (ANNs) are simplified computational models simulating the central nervous system. They are widely applied in medicine, since they substantially in...
Treatment of urolithiasis using extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
Treatment of urolithiasis using extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
Aim: For many years extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is known for the first line of treatment of urolithiasis in Perm Regional Clinical Hospital. All of the patients were trea...
Effectiveness of Spinal Analgesia for Labor Pain Compared with Epidural Analgesia
Effectiveness of Spinal Analgesia for Labor Pain Compared with Epidural Analgesia
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the analgesic effect of single-dose spinal versus epidural analgesia for labor pain to verify if applying a single dose spinal analgesia is ...
Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy versus Ballistic Lithotripsy for Treatment of Ureteric Stones: A Prospective Comparative Study
Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy versus Ballistic Lithotripsy for Treatment of Ureteric Stones: A Prospective Comparative Study
<i>Objectives:</i> This study was undertaken to compare the results of laser (Ho:YAG) and pneumatic (ballistic) intracorporeal lithotripsy for ureteric calculi in terms...
The Practice of Multimodal Analgesia Technique for Patients Undergoing Surgery under General Anaesthesia in Debre Markos Compersive Specialized Hospital Debre Markos, East Gojjam, Ethiopia, 2022. A Cross-Sectional Study
The Practice of Multimodal Analgesia Technique for Patients Undergoing Surgery under General Anaesthesia in Debre Markos Compersive Specialized Hospital Debre Markos, East Gojjam, Ethiopia, 2022. A Cross-Sectional Study
Background: Practice guidelines for preoperative pain management recommend that multimodal analgesic therapy should be used for postsurgical patients. This method uses different a...

