Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Factors Affecting the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Urinary Stone Treatment

View through CrossRef
Background and aim: The recurrence of urinary stones occurs in two thirds of patients within a 20-year period, making urinary stones a common pathology. Among urology pathologies, kidney stones rank third behind urinary infections and conditions of the prostate. The present study intended to assess various factors affecting the extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) outcome in urinary stone treatment. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out on 136 urinary stone patients who underwent extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the Department of Urology, Sahiwal Teaching Hospital, Sahiwal for the duration from September 2021 to August 2022. Computed tomography confirmed the presence of stones and measured the size (3-20 mm), distance from skin to stone, location, and density in Hounsfield units. Patient’s characteristics such as estimated rate of glomerular filtration and BMI were measured. A successful ESWL requires at least a 3mm residual renal stone fragment in post-therapy, and at least a complete clearance of ureteric stones at the end of treatment. SPSS version 26 was used for descriptive statistic. Results: Of the total 136 urinary stone patients, there were 108 (79.4%) male and 28 (20.6%) females. The incidence of stones present in proximal ureter, mid, and distal ureter was 72 (52.9%), 7 (5.1%), and 57 (41.9%) respectively. All the patients underwent ESWL 1.5 times (average), and the success rate in first, second, and third session was 67.8% (n=92), 83.8% (n=114), and 91.2% (n=124) respectively. The overall success rate of ESWL was 80.9%. A multivariate analysis revealed that HU [OR=0.89, 95% CI, 0.96-0.98, P=0.001) and stone size [OR=0.79, 95% CI, 0.62-0.98, P=0.051] were significantly affecting the first ESWL session success rate. Third session success rate was significantly affected by stone size [OR=0.76, 95% CI, 0.58-0.95, P=0.015]. Stent associated higher failure rate [OR=6.425, 95% CI, 2.132-18.235, p=0.001] and ESWL failure was three-times higher in females than in male. Conclusion: The present study found that the overall success rate of ESWL in urinary stone treatment was 80.9%. ESWL success rates were affected by stone size and HU. Patients' pain and fragmentation levels should be considered when adjusting the intensity of ESWL. Keywords: Urinary stone treatment, Outcomes, Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy
Title: Factors Affecting the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Urinary Stone Treatment
Description:
Background and aim: The recurrence of urinary stones occurs in two thirds of patients within a 20-year period, making urinary stones a common pathology.
Among urology pathologies, kidney stones rank third behind urinary infections and conditions of the prostate.
The present study intended to assess various factors affecting the extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) outcome in urinary stone treatment.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out on 136 urinary stone patients who underwent extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the Department of Urology, Sahiwal Teaching Hospital, Sahiwal for the duration from September 2021 to August 2022.
Computed tomography confirmed the presence of stones and measured the size (3-20 mm), distance from skin to stone, location, and density in Hounsfield units.
Patient’s characteristics such as estimated rate of glomerular filtration and BMI were measured.
A successful ESWL requires at least a 3mm residual renal stone fragment in post-therapy, and at least a complete clearance of ureteric stones at the end of treatment.
SPSS version 26 was used for descriptive statistic.
Results: Of the total 136 urinary stone patients, there were 108 (79.
4%) male and 28 (20.
6%) females.
The incidence of stones present in proximal ureter, mid, and distal ureter was 72 (52.
9%), 7 (5.
1%), and 57 (41.
9%) respectively.
All the patients underwent ESWL 1.
5 times (average), and the success rate in first, second, and third session was 67.
8% (n=92), 83.
8% (n=114), and 91.
2% (n=124) respectively.
The overall success rate of ESWL was 80.
9%.
A multivariate analysis revealed that HU [OR=0.
89, 95% CI, 0.
96-0.
98, P=0.
001) and stone size [OR=0.
79, 95% CI, 0.
62-0.
98, P=0.
051] were significantly affecting the first ESWL session success rate.
Third session success rate was significantly affected by stone size [OR=0.
76, 95% CI, 0.
58-0.
95, P=0.
015].
Stent associated higher failure rate [OR=6.
425, 95% CI, 2.
132-18.
235, p=0.
001] and ESWL failure was three-times higher in females than in male.
Conclusion: The present study found that the overall success rate of ESWL in urinary stone treatment was 80.
9%.
ESWL success rates were affected by stone size and HU.
Patients' pain and fragmentation levels should be considered when adjusting the intensity of ESWL.
Keywords: Urinary stone treatment, Outcomes, Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

Related Results

Outcome Of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (Eswl) Of Lower Ureteric Stones
Outcome Of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (Eswl) Of Lower Ureteric Stones
Urolithiasis is a prevailing urological condition, with ureteric stones affecting around 22% of cases, mostly causing severe pain and other complications. Surveillance, medical the...
Stone-free Rate of Ultrasound-assisted and Fluoroscopy-guided Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Radiopaque Renal Stones
Stone-free Rate of Ultrasound-assisted and Fluoroscopy-guided Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Radiopaque Renal Stones
Background: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has been a widely accepted method for treating urinary stones since the early 1980s. ESWL is the preferred non-invasive tre...
LASER LITHOTRIPSY VS PNEUMATIC LITHOTRIPSY IN URETERIC STONE REMOVAL: A CONTROLLED TRIAL
LASER LITHOTRIPSY VS PNEUMATIC LITHOTRIPSY IN URETERIC STONE REMOVAL: A CONTROLLED TRIAL
Ureteric stones represent a significant proportion of urolithiasis cases and are a common cause of emergency department visits worldwide. Minimally invasive endourological techniqu...
Single Centre Experience of Slow Versus Fast Rate ESWL in Urolithiasis
Single Centre Experience of Slow Versus Fast Rate ESWL in Urolithiasis
Aim: To compare the success of slow rate with fast rate extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of urolithiasis. Study design: Randomized controlled trial Place &...
Analysis of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in renal calcular disease among children: a tertiary care experience
Analysis of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in renal calcular disease among children: a tertiary care experience
Background: The aim of this study is to review 10 years of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) experience in paediatric urolithiasis patients.Methods: Data from a cohort o...
Reporting gaps in shockwave-assisted orthodontic tooth movement and tooth mobility studies
Reporting gaps in shockwave-assisted orthodontic tooth movement and tooth mobility studies
Abstract Introduction: To date, studies exploring shockwave-assisted orthodontic tooth movement and tooth mobility have produce...

Back to Top