Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in France
View through CrossRef
Abstract
This chapter describes administrative procedure and judicial review in France. In French public law, no constitutional provision provides for judicial review of administrative measures. Nor is there a convention providing for judicial review of administrative measures. This is only envisaged by the laws and regulations, in particular the Administrative Justice Code and the Code of Relations between the Public and the Administration. The administrative courts exercise extensive control over the acts or measures of the public administration, including both individual decisions and regulatory acts, but some are nonetheless beyond judicial review. Where an act or measure is contested on procedural grounds, judicial review takes place only under certain conditions: the procedural defect must have deprived the applicant of a guarantee or it must have influenced the meaning of the decision taken. Two types of judicial remedy exist in administrative law: it is therefore up to the applicant to limit their application before the administrative judge.
Title: Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in France
Description:
Abstract
This chapter describes administrative procedure and judicial review in France.
In French public law, no constitutional provision provides for judicial review of administrative measures.
Nor is there a convention providing for judicial review of administrative measures.
This is only envisaged by the laws and regulations, in particular the Administrative Justice Code and the Code of Relations between the Public and the Administration.
The administrative courts exercise extensive control over the acts or measures of the public administration, including both individual decisions and regulatory acts, but some are nonetheless beyond judicial review.
Where an act or measure is contested on procedural grounds, judicial review takes place only under certain conditions: the procedural defect must have deprived the applicant of a guarantee or it must have influenced the meaning of the decision taken.
Two types of judicial remedy exist in administrative law: it is therefore up to the applicant to limit their application before the administrative judge.
Related Results
Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Latin America
Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Latin America
Abstract
This chapter explains administrative procedure and judicial review in Latin America. Judicial review of administrative action has been constitutionalised in...
Priorities of Judicial Review of Complaints as a Component of the Judicial Protection Mechanism for Citizens’ Rights in Pre-Trial Criminal Proceedings
Priorities of Judicial Review of Complaints as a Component of the Judicial Protection Mechanism for Citizens’ Rights in Pre-Trial Criminal Proceedings
Based on the analysis of contemporary scholarly approaches to defining the functional purpose of first-instance courts in ensuring judicial protection of citizens’ rights during pr...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
JUDICIAL CONCILIATION AND JUDICIAL CONCILIATOR
JUDICIAL CONCILIATION AND JUDICIAL CONCILIATOR
The article analyzes the provisions of procedural legislation on judicial conciliation and judicial conciliators. The authors review the provisions of several draft laws that conta...
Judicial constitutional review and the transformation of modern constitutionalism: problems of harmonization and development
Judicial constitutional review and the transformation of modern constitutionalism: problems of harmonization and development
The relevance of the research topic lies in the significance of judicial constitutional review as a key institution that ensures stability and development of the constitutional ord...
Consideration As A Criminal Sanction
Consideration As A Criminal Sanction
In the list of types of liability traditionally distinguished in the legal system of Armenia, procedural, including criminal, liability was not included. The 1998 edition of
the RA...
Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in the United Kingdom
Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in the United Kingdom
Abstract
This chapter focuses on administrative procedure and judicial review in the United Kingdom. Initially, it should be stressed that administrative law is diff...
Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in China
Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in China
Abstract
This chapter focuses on administrative procedure and judicial review in China. Despite its willingness to adapt to the rules of the global market, China doe...

