Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Domain-specific cognitive flexibility: Shift-readiness adaptations for task- and attention-switching are non-transferrable
View through CrossRef
Adaptive behavior in the real world involves navigating competing goals in a constantly changing environment. Doing so requires cognitive flexibility across multiple domains, including flexibility for switching between tasks, i.e., activating the appropriate rules for stimulus-response associations, and flexibility for shifting attention between different sources of sensory inputs. Previous work in task-switching and attention-shifting has separately shown that people are capable of strategically modulating both types of flexibility based on the relevant current demands. That is, people become better at switching between tasks (e.g., digit magnitude versus parity tasks) when switches are frequently cued and better at shifting attention between different stimulus locations when shifts are frequently cued. Across five experiments in the current study, we investigated the possibility of cognitive flexibility transfer between the domains of task switching and attention shifting when the frequency of switches/shifts are orthogonally manipulated within the same context. We implemented a novel paradigm that involved concurrent cued task switching and attentional shifting. We varied either the proportion of task-switches or attention-shifts across blocks of trials, while keeping the proportion of the other constant. If flexibility adaptations in biased contexts transferred across domains, switch/shift frequency manipulations in one domain should affect flexibility across both domains. Instead, in Experiments 1-3, we found that performance costs of attentional shifts remained constant across task-switch biased contexts despite adjustments in task-switch costs; likewise, in Experiments 4-5, we found that costs of switching between tasks remained constant across blocks that varied in attention-shift frequency despite adaptations in attention-shift costs. These results suggest that probabilistic learning and adjustments of attention-shifts and task-switches to meet contextual demands occur independently.
Title: Domain-specific cognitive flexibility: Shift-readiness adaptations for task- and attention-switching are non-transferrable
Description:
Adaptive behavior in the real world involves navigating competing goals in a constantly changing environment.
Doing so requires cognitive flexibility across multiple domains, including flexibility for switching between tasks, i.
e.
, activating the appropriate rules for stimulus-response associations, and flexibility for shifting attention between different sources of sensory inputs.
Previous work in task-switching and attention-shifting has separately shown that people are capable of strategically modulating both types of flexibility based on the relevant current demands.
That is, people become better at switching between tasks (e.
g.
, digit magnitude versus parity tasks) when switches are frequently cued and better at shifting attention between different stimulus locations when shifts are frequently cued.
Across five experiments in the current study, we investigated the possibility of cognitive flexibility transfer between the domains of task switching and attention shifting when the frequency of switches/shifts are orthogonally manipulated within the same context.
We implemented a novel paradigm that involved concurrent cued task switching and attentional shifting.
We varied either the proportion of task-switches or attention-shifts across blocks of trials, while keeping the proportion of the other constant.
If flexibility adaptations in biased contexts transferred across domains, switch/shift frequency manipulations in one domain should affect flexibility across both domains.
Instead, in Experiments 1-3, we found that performance costs of attentional shifts remained constant across task-switch biased contexts despite adjustments in task-switch costs; likewise, in Experiments 4-5, we found that costs of switching between tasks remained constant across blocks that varied in attention-shift frequency despite adaptations in attention-shift costs.
These results suggest that probabilistic learning and adjustments of attention-shifts and task-switches to meet contextual demands occur independently.
Related Results
Domain-specific cognitive flexibility: Shift-readiness adaptations for task- and attention-switching are non-transferrable
Domain-specific cognitive flexibility: Shift-readiness adaptations for task- and attention-switching are non-transferrable
Adaptive behavior in the real world involves navigating competing goals in a constantly changing environment. Doing so requires cognitive flexibility across multiple domains, inclu...
Midlife Marital Status and Subsequent Cognitive Decline over 20 Years: Discovery from ARIC
Midlife Marital Status and Subsequent Cognitive Decline over 20 Years: Discovery from ARIC
Background — Recent studies show that marriage is associated with a protective effect against cognitive decline among older adults. However, definite evidence from large prospectiv...
Minimal impact of consolidation on learned switch-readiness
Minimal impact of consolidation on learned switch-readiness
Adaptive behavior is characterized by our ability to create, maintain, and update (or switch) rules by which we categorize and respond to stimuli across changing contexts (cognitiv...
Code-switching: Types and Functions in Fathia Izzati's Vlog
Code-switching: Types and Functions in Fathia Izzati's Vlog
Abstract. This study analyzed the code-switching used in Fathia Izzati's YouTube videos channel according to the types and their functions. This study used a qualitative descriptiv...
Processing Speed Predicts Mean Performance in Task-Switching but Not Task-Switching Cost
Processing Speed Predicts Mean Performance in Task-Switching but Not Task-Switching Cost
In several studies, it has been suggested that task-switching performance is linked to processing speed. Here we argue that the relation between processing speed and high-level cog...
Contextual Adaptation of Cognitive Flexibility is driven by Task- and Item-Level Learning
Contextual Adaptation of Cognitive Flexibility is driven by Task- and Item-Level Learning
Adaptive behavior requires finding, and adjusting, an optimal tradeoff between focusing on a current task-set (cognitive stability) and updating that task-set when the environment ...
Task sets define boundaries of learned cognitive flexibility in list-wide proportion switch manipulations
Task sets define boundaries of learned cognitive flexibility in list-wide proportion switch manipulations
Different contexts in daily life often require varying levels of cognitive flexibility. Previous research has shown that people adapt their level of flexibility to match changing c...
Impact of Tinnitus on Quality of Life and Cognitive Function in Adults: A Systematic Review
Impact of Tinnitus on Quality of Life and Cognitive Function in Adults: A Systematic Review
Background: Tinnitus is often associated with cognitive difficulties, especially in attention and executive functioning. However, it remains unclear how much tinnitus itself contri...


