Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

“Open Book”: The Hearing In The Matter Of J. Robert Oppenheimer

View through CrossRef
Abstract The chief puzzle surrounding Robert Oppenheimer’s security clearance hearing is why it had not happened earlier. Despite Truman’s approval of the Super project in 1950, its supporters had neither forgiven nor forgotten Oppenheimer’s opposition. As Cold War anxieties rose, many key H-bomb supporters had grown increasingly anxious about his continued influence on atomic weapons development. Oppenheimer was neither the only eminent scientist to oppose the Super nor the only one to do so on moral grounds: in 1949, Compton, Conant, Fermi, and Rabi, among others, had signed on to documents that articulated powerful practical and moral objections to the Super’s development. But this did not cause its proponents to question the integrity of these scientists, nor to fear that they were spies. Oppenheimer was different. No one else with that much access and influence had that much of a leftwing past. No one else with that much of a leftwing past had that much access and influence. Oppenheimer’s opposition to the Super’s development coupled with his past leftwing activities to magnify the suspicion and determination of his adversaries. Their fear of each intensified their fear of the other.
Oxford University PressNew York, NY
Title: “Open Book”: The Hearing In The Matter Of J. Robert Oppenheimer
Description:
Abstract The chief puzzle surrounding Robert Oppenheimer’s security clearance hearing is why it had not happened earlier.
Despite Truman’s approval of the Super project in 1950, its supporters had neither forgiven nor forgotten Oppenheimer’s opposition.
As Cold War anxieties rose, many key H-bomb supporters had grown increasingly anxious about his continued influence on atomic weapons development.
Oppenheimer was neither the only eminent scientist to oppose the Super nor the only one to do so on moral grounds: in 1949, Compton, Conant, Fermi, and Rabi, among others, had signed on to documents that articulated powerful practical and moral objections to the Super’s development.
But this did not cause its proponents to question the integrity of these scientists, nor to fear that they were spies.
Oppenheimer was different.
No one else with that much access and influence had that much of a leftwing past.
No one else with that much of a leftwing past had that much access and influence.
Oppenheimer’s opposition to the Super’s development coupled with his past leftwing activities to magnify the suspicion and determination of his adversaries.
Their fear of each intensified their fear of the other.

Related Results

If I Had Possession over Judgment Day: Augmenting Robert Johnson
If I Had Possession over Judgment Day: Augmenting Robert Johnson
augmentvb [ɔːgˈmɛnt]1. to make or become greater in number, amount, strength, etc.; increase2. Music: to increase (a major or perfect interval) by a semitone (Collins English Dicti...
Introduction To Hearing And Speech Rehabilitation
Introduction To Hearing And Speech Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation of hearing and speech represents a theory that needs to be confirmed, and also the practice, also a process which is in continuous progress. It is simultaneously a s...
Pattern of hearing loss among patients visiting ENT OPD at Janaki Medical College: A cross sectional study
Pattern of hearing loss among patients visiting ENT OPD at Janaki Medical College: A cross sectional study
Background and Objectives: To study the pattern of hearing loss among patients visiting ENT OPD in Janaki medical college teaching hospital.Material and Methods: The study was cond...
Hearing Loss in Stroke Cases: A Literature Review
Hearing Loss in Stroke Cases: A Literature Review
Stroke is the most common cause of neurological disability (MacDonald, Cockerell, Sander, & Shorvon, 2000) and about 1 in 3 stroke life survivors are functionally reliant on it...
Non-compliance in Elderly Hearing-aid Users
Non-compliance in Elderly Hearing-aid Users
Objective (Background): Despite the scientific advancements, acceptance of hearing-aids remains poor in persons with hearing impairment in the elderly age group. The attitudinal is...
FREQUENCY OF CONGENITAL HEARING LOSS IN NEONATES
FREQUENCY OF CONGENITAL HEARING LOSS IN NEONATES
Background:Congenital hearing loss is one of the most common neonatal sensory deficits, affecting approximately 1–3 per 1,000 live births globally. Early identification during the ...

Back to Top