Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Squeeze Cementing: State of the Art

View through CrossRef
Summary Squeeze cementing is a routine well operation that has acquired a multitude of rules of thumb or procedural gimmicks because it evolved as a nontechnical field practice. The real technology controlling squeeze cementing behavior is readily available, but current practices are often contrary to technology published and engineering logic. Maximum pressures and displaced volumes are reported meticulously, even though their effect on results is unimportant. Formation breakdown often is accomplished at a high rate, causing larger fractures and use of more cement with no better results. Assumptions are made on the basis of whole cement entering the matrix and the concept of a horizontal pancake of cement, when both ideas are invalid. Both high- and low-pressure squeeze cement in techniques have their proper application. Fluid-loss control is important in set-through applications, but fluid loss must not be too low. Reduction of slurry density is often important. Pumpability time for any cement must be determined with proper regard for the mix water anticipated and the synergistic effect of some additives. The time must be sufficient to complete the job, but not so long that a firm set is jeopardized. Strength of set cement used in squeeze operations can be quite low and still retain all the pressure differential that most pipe can withstand. Successful evaluation is not conclusive with the conventional pressure test. A reverse differential is important to obtain a definitive test and provide for optimal reperforating conditions. Introduction Squeeze cementing technology, which is straightforward and currently well documented, continues to be clouded by field practices developed over the past half century when the technique was considered an art rather than a science. Cement quality control left a great deal to be desired in the earlier usages, and little concern was given to the source of the mix water. Many currently popular practices were developed by trial and error on the part of field personnel to meet the irregularities caused by the cement, additives, and mix-water variations. The problem is compounded by the jet-hopper mixing system. The jet hopper is a simple and ingenious device that made fast mixing of large volumes of cement possible, as needed for most casing cementing operations. It was easy to adopt the same equipment for the smaller squeeze cementing operation. In practice, the hopper is not a consistent mixing apparatus, and that quality is often of critical importance in squeeze operations. Equipment and procedures or habits developed over many years are ingrained in supervisors (and many managers) who have spent much of their career closely associated with field operations. In many companies, it is difficult to encourage sincere trial of techniques well proved and documented by other operators or other divisions within the same company. The rationale of these experienced leaders is based on many years of reasonably acceptable end results and a few vivid recollections of isolated but seemingly catastrophic results, such as real or imagined flash setting of cement. Fundamental Principles The squeeze cementing process merits a very simple definition. It is an operation wherein cement slurry is forced under pressure to a specific point in a well. Uses includeexclusion of water, gas, or oil from the producing formation,recompletion from a depleted or an unwanted interval to a new interval,repair of casing or pipe failure, andrepair of a faulty primary cement job, usually called a channel. JPT P. 37^
Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)
Title: Squeeze Cementing: State of the Art
Description:
Summary Squeeze cementing is a routine well operation that has acquired a multitude of rules of thumb or procedural gimmicks because it evolved as a nontechnical field practice.
The real technology controlling squeeze cementing behavior is readily available, but current practices are often contrary to technology published and engineering logic.
Maximum pressures and displaced volumes are reported meticulously, even though their effect on results is unimportant.
Formation breakdown often is accomplished at a high rate, causing larger fractures and use of more cement with no better results.
Assumptions are made on the basis of whole cement entering the matrix and the concept of a horizontal pancake of cement, when both ideas are invalid.
Both high- and low-pressure squeeze cement in techniques have their proper application.
Fluid-loss control is important in set-through applications, but fluid loss must not be too low.
Reduction of slurry density is often important.
Pumpability time for any cement must be determined with proper regard for the mix water anticipated and the synergistic effect of some additives.
The time must be sufficient to complete the job, but not so long that a firm set is jeopardized.
Strength of set cement used in squeeze operations can be quite low and still retain all the pressure differential that most pipe can withstand.
Successful evaluation is not conclusive with the conventional pressure test.
A reverse differential is important to obtain a definitive test and provide for optimal reperforating conditions.
Introduction Squeeze cementing technology, which is straightforward and currently well documented, continues to be clouded by field practices developed over the past half century when the technique was considered an art rather than a science.
Cement quality control left a great deal to be desired in the earlier usages, and little concern was given to the source of the mix water.
Many currently popular practices were developed by trial and error on the part of field personnel to meet the irregularities caused by the cement, additives, and mix-water variations.
The problem is compounded by the jet-hopper mixing system.
The jet hopper is a simple and ingenious device that made fast mixing of large volumes of cement possible, as needed for most casing cementing operations.
It was easy to adopt the same equipment for the smaller squeeze cementing operation.
In practice, the hopper is not a consistent mixing apparatus, and that quality is often of critical importance in squeeze operations.
Equipment and procedures or habits developed over many years are ingrained in supervisors (and many managers) who have spent much of their career closely associated with field operations.
In many companies, it is difficult to encourage sincere trial of techniques well proved and documented by other operators or other divisions within the same company.
The rationale of these experienced leaders is based on many years of reasonably acceptable end results and a few vivid recollections of isolated but seemingly catastrophic results, such as real or imagined flash setting of cement.
Fundamental Principles The squeeze cementing process merits a very simple definition.
It is an operation wherein cement slurry is forced under pressure to a specific point in a well.
Uses includeexclusion of water, gas, or oil from the producing formation,recompletion from a depleted or an unwanted interval to a new interval,repair of casing or pipe failure, andrepair of a faulty primary cement job, usually called a channel.
JPT P.
37^.

Related Results

A Deep Dive on Stage Cementing Operations in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case Study
A Deep Dive on Stage Cementing Operations in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case Study
Abstract Cementing through weak sand and unconsolidated formations are a common occurrence in today's drilling operations. Main challenges include well control, poor...
Performance Experiment of Ultra high Temperature Cementing Slurry System
Performance Experiment of Ultra high Temperature Cementing Slurry System
Abstract The continuous development of oil and gas exploration and development to deep and ultra deep wells in China, the formation temperature is also getting higher and h...
Full Offline Well Cementing Implementation Resulting in Significant Time Savings and Improvement in Operational Efficiency
Full Offline Well Cementing Implementation Resulting in Significant Time Savings and Improvement in Operational Efficiency
Abstract The current global low oil price environment has driven many operators to consider having a quicker and more efficient operations and reduction of the well ...
Wellbore Strengthening through Squeeze Cementing: A Case Study
Wellbore Strengthening through Squeeze Cementing: A Case Study
Abstract Formation strength is an important parameter in drilling operations pressure control because it indicates the wellbore pressure containment envelope above w...
Collaborative Approach Overcomes Cementing Challenges in Narrow Pressure Window Environment
Collaborative Approach Overcomes Cementing Challenges in Narrow Pressure Window Environment
Abstract The collaborative approach used for cementing the production liner in an onshore development well in Russia is presented. The reservoir has a narrow window ...
An Evaluation Cement Method Using Gamma-Gamma Density Imaging Logging in a Double Casing Well
An Evaluation Cement Method Using Gamma-Gamma Density Imaging Logging in a Double Casing Well
Deep wells, ultradeep wells, and some offshore oil wells are characterized by high pressure and high temperature, and their cementing casing is often prone to collapse and rupture....
Cementing Practices - 1972
Cementing Practices - 1972
Abstract This paper presents a review of experience for successful cementing in oil and gas wells. Recommendations and considerations for use of various cements, ...
Research on Pressure Loss and Filling Ability of Semi-Solid Rheological Behavior in Squeeze Casting
Research on Pressure Loss and Filling Ability of Semi-Solid Rheological Behavior in Squeeze Casting
Abstract The filling ability of alloy fluid under pressure is of great significance to improve the dimensional integrity and mechanical properties of thin-walled and slende...

Back to Top