Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Landscape Composition Matters for Mammals in Agricultural Ecosystems: A Multiscale Study
View through CrossRef
The conversion of native habitats into anthropogenic ones compromises the original composition and configuration of the landscapes, influencing ecological dynamics and affecting biodiversity. Increasingly, landscape ecology has shown that these effects can only be understood if accessed at adequate spatial scales, as the scale which landscape structure is evaluated influences species responses. Here, we investigated how three variables of landscape composition (proportion of forest, coffee crop and pasture) and two of configuration (number of fragments and mean nearest neighbor distance) interfere in the richness and composition of medium and large-sized mammals considering a multiscale approach. We recorded medium and large-sized mammal species in 13 landscapes with predominantly matrices of coffee and pasture in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Then, we built distance-based linear models to identify the scale of effect of each landscape variable for both response variables considering eight scales (from 250 m to 2000 m). Finally, we verified the influence of the landscape on the richness and composition of mammals, considering the landscape variables in their respective scales of effect. We found 67% of the probable species occurring in the region. The scales of effect varied among landscape variables probably due to the different variables affect different aspects of organisms' ecological requirements. The proportion of pasture in the landscape explained the variation in species richness, while the proportion of forest explained the variation in species composition. In addition, the proportion of pasture in the landscape had a positive influence on species richness, indicating that this matrix may favor the presence of generalist species of habitat and/or this result is due to the higher concentration of species in the fragments immersed in this matrix. These results suggest that considering different responses to biodiversity is important to understand different aspects of the landscape's influence on biodiversity. In addition, the composition of the landscape is fundamental for the perpetuation of species and, therefore, both forest cover and types of matrices in the landscape must be considered to improve species conservation strategies. Finally, generalizing a spatial scale can lead to misinterpretations about the influence of the landscape on biodiversity.
Title: Landscape Composition Matters for Mammals in Agricultural Ecosystems: A Multiscale Study
Description:
The conversion of native habitats into anthropogenic ones compromises the original composition and configuration of the landscapes, influencing ecological dynamics and affecting biodiversity.
Increasingly, landscape ecology has shown that these effects can only be understood if accessed at adequate spatial scales, as the scale which landscape structure is evaluated influences species responses.
Here, we investigated how three variables of landscape composition (proportion of forest, coffee crop and pasture) and two of configuration (number of fragments and mean nearest neighbor distance) interfere in the richness and composition of medium and large-sized mammals considering a multiscale approach.
We recorded medium and large-sized mammal species in 13 landscapes with predominantly matrices of coffee and pasture in Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Then, we built distance-based linear models to identify the scale of effect of each landscape variable for both response variables considering eight scales (from 250 m to 2000 m).
Finally, we verified the influence of the landscape on the richness and composition of mammals, considering the landscape variables in their respective scales of effect.
We found 67% of the probable species occurring in the region.
The scales of effect varied among landscape variables probably due to the different variables affect different aspects of organisms' ecological requirements.
The proportion of pasture in the landscape explained the variation in species richness, while the proportion of forest explained the variation in species composition.
In addition, the proportion of pasture in the landscape had a positive influence on species richness, indicating that this matrix may favor the presence of generalist species of habitat and/or this result is due to the higher concentration of species in the fragments immersed in this matrix.
These results suggest that considering different responses to biodiversity is important to understand different aspects of the landscape's influence on biodiversity.
In addition, the composition of the landscape is fundamental for the perpetuation of species and, therefore, both forest cover and types of matrices in the landscape must be considered to improve species conservation strategies.
Finally, generalizing a spatial scale can lead to misinterpretations about the influence of the landscape on biodiversity.
Related Results
Innovation Ecosystems in Management: An Organizing Typology
Innovation Ecosystems in Management: An Organizing Typology
The concept of an “ecosystem” is increasingly used in management and business to describe collectives of heterogeneous, yet complementary organizations who jointly create some kind...
Analysis of the Impact of Agricultural Products Import Trade on Agricultural Carbon Productivity: Empirical Evidence from China
Analysis of the Impact of Agricultural Products Import Trade on Agricultural Carbon Productivity: Empirical Evidence from China
Abstract
To realize the goal of “dual carbon”, China urgently needs to seek the path of low-carbon agricultural development. The existing agricultural trade deficit in Chin...
The impact of agricultural production agglomeration on agricultural economic resilience: based on spatial spillover and threshold effect test
The impact of agricultural production agglomeration on agricultural economic resilience: based on spatial spillover and threshold effect test
This study focuses on the role of agricultural production agglomeration in strengthening agricultural economic resilience, exploring the threshold effect of agricultural technologi...
Valuation of Ecosystem Services, Karnataka State, India
Valuation of Ecosystem Services, Karnataka State, India
Humans depend on the environment for their basic needs, such as food, fuel, minerals, water, air, etc. Burgeoning unplanned development activities to cater to the demands of the in...
HyMM: Hybrid method for disease-gene prediction by integrating multiscale module structures
HyMM: Hybrid method for disease-gene prediction by integrating multiscale module structures
AbstractMotivationIdentifying disease-related genes is important for the study of human complex diseases. Module structures or community structures are ubiquitous in biological net...
Progressively excluding mammals of different body size affects community and trait structure of ground beetles
Progressively excluding mammals of different body size affects community and trait structure of ground beetles
Mammalian grazing induces changes in vegetation properties in grasslands, which can affect a wide variety of other animals including many arthropods. However, the impacts may depen...
Agricultural Risk Management and its Impact on Agricultural Companies’ Revenues: Field Study on the Agricultural Sector - Blue Nile region
Agricultural Risk Management and its Impact on Agricultural Companies’ Revenues: Field Study on the Agricultural Sector - Blue Nile region
This study aims to clarify three points, among which are: the agricultural risk management mechanisms that affect the income of agricultural companies, statement of risk management...
Myanmar’s terrestrial ecosystems: status, threats and conservation opportunities
Myanmar’s terrestrial ecosystems: status, threats and conservation opportunities
AbstractMyanmar is highly biodiverse, with more than 16,000 plant, 314 mammal, 1131 bird, 293 reptile, and 139 amphibian species. Supporting this biodiversity is a variety of natur...

