Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Rhazes in the Renaissance of Andreas Vesalius

View through CrossRef
AbstractAndreas Vesalius' (1514–64) first publication was a Paraphrasis of the ninth book of the Liber ad Almansorem, written by the Arab–Persian physician and alchemist Rhazes (854–925). The role of Rhazes in Vesalius' oeuvre has thus far been much disregarded. The different ways Rhazes recurs reveal an intellectual evolution in Vesalius' work. In the Paraphrasis, Vesalius subjects Rhazes to the authority of Galen in the context of the early sixteenth-century humanist campaign for the substitution of Arab influences by Greek ‘originals’. Over the years Vesalius continues his work on Rhazes, but his approach becomes more internationalistic. Ultimately, Vesalius criticises Galen while expressing sympathy for the Arab author. This may be the more significant as Rhazes could have influenced Vesalius in the act of criticising Galen – critical discussions of Galen were available to Vesalius in Latin translations of Rhazes's Liber Continens. Although Vesalius never refers to the work, it is hardly possible he was unaware of it: similarities in structure, rhetoric and form between the Continens and the De humani corporis fabrica could support this hypothesis.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: Rhazes in the Renaissance of Andreas Vesalius
Description:
AbstractAndreas Vesalius' (1514–64) first publication was a Paraphrasis of the ninth book of the Liber ad Almansorem, written by the Arab–Persian physician and alchemist Rhazes (854–925).
The role of Rhazes in Vesalius' oeuvre has thus far been much disregarded.
The different ways Rhazes recurs reveal an intellectual evolution in Vesalius' work.
In the Paraphrasis, Vesalius subjects Rhazes to the authority of Galen in the context of the early sixteenth-century humanist campaign for the substitution of Arab influences by Greek ‘originals’.
Over the years Vesalius continues his work on Rhazes, but his approach becomes more internationalistic.
Ultimately, Vesalius criticises Galen while expressing sympathy for the Arab author.
This may be the more significant as Rhazes could have influenced Vesalius in the act of criticising Galen – critical discussions of Galen were available to Vesalius in Latin translations of Rhazes's Liber Continens.
Although Vesalius never refers to the work, it is hardly possible he was unaware of it: similarities in structure, rhetoric and form between the Continens and the De humani corporis fabrica could support this hypothesis.

Related Results

The Luther Renaissance
The Luther Renaissance
The Luther Renaissance is the most important international network for Luther research, as well as an ecclesial, ecumenical and cultural reform movement between 1900 and 1960 in Ge...
The Renaissance
The Renaissance
The whole of the Oxford Bibliographies Renaissance and Reformation module has grown since its inception to embrace the period 1350–1750. That time span includes the period scholars...
Andreas Vesalius’ 500th Anniversary: First Description of the Mammary Suspensory Ligaments
Andreas Vesalius’ 500th Anniversary: First Description of the Mammary Suspensory Ligaments
AbstractSir Astley Paston Cooper has, to date, been acknowledged to be the first to describe the suspensory ligaments of the breast, or Cooper’s ligaments, in 1840. We found these ...
Andreas Vesalius and the ‘sharp-eyed and careful reader’
Andreas Vesalius and the ‘sharp-eyed and careful reader’
Abstract A key element in Vesalius’s De humani corporis fabrica (1543) is the identifying lettering a...
Andreas Vesalius as a renaissance innovative neuroanatomist: his 5th centenary of birth
Andreas Vesalius as a renaissance innovative neuroanatomist: his 5th centenary of birth
Andreas Vesalius (1514-1564) is considered the Father of Modern Anatomy, and an authentic representative of the Renaissance. His studies, founded on dissection of human bodies, dif...
De Russische vertalingen van Andreas Vesalius' (1514-1564) anatomische werken
De Russische vertalingen van Andreas Vesalius' (1514-1564) anatomische werken
History of the translation of Andreas Vesalius’s anatomical works into RussianAn important contribution to the scientific reform of medicine in Russia in the seventeenth century wa...
Centennial ties: Harvey Cushing (1869–1939) and William Osler (1849–1919) on Andreas Vesalius (1514–1564)
Centennial ties: Harvey Cushing (1869–1939) and William Osler (1849–1919) on Andreas Vesalius (1514–1564)
Andreas Vesalius is often regarded as the founding father of modern anatomical study. The quincentennial anniversary of his birth – 31 December 2014 – has been very widely commemor...
Dissection and representation of muscles in Vesalius, Canano, Sagemolen
Dissection and representation of muscles in Vesalius, Canano, Sagemolen
The recently discovered drawings of Sagemolen (ca. 1660) and the anatomical works published 100 years earlier by Giovanni Battista Canano in 1542 (Muscularum humani corporis pictur...

Back to Top