Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Axial Compression Capacity of Concrete Columns Reinforced With Corrosion-Resistant Metallic Reinforcement
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Axial compression performance of concrete columns reinforced with 2304 duplex stainless bars and spirals, carbon steel bars and spirals, and 316L stainless steel clad bars, in varying combinations is examined when the columns are exposed to corrosion. Two groups of columns were investigated: a control group, and a group submerged in a 5.0% by weight chloride solution subjected to accelerated corrosion. A relatively high corrosion rate of 8.5 μA/mm2 was used. After 60 days of corrosion the columns were tested to failure under axial compression. In terms of mass loss per unit of corrosion energy, columns reinforced with stainless steel spirals and either solid stainless or stainless clad vertical bars were 197% more corrosion resistant than carbon steel. Bars made with 2304 stainless steel and 316L stainless clad materials developed localized pitting corrosion that led to degradation of the concrete cover and a larger drop in axial compression than carbon steel reinforced columns. However, the all-carbon steel reinforced columns reached lower failure displacements and a corroded carbon steel reinforced column was the only column to experience sudden failure prior to reaching its theoretical maximum axial compression capacity. Axial compression capacity of the columns in both the control and corroded conditions was modeled using concrete confinement models that produced very good agreement with the experimental results.
Title: Axial Compression Capacity of Concrete Columns Reinforced With Corrosion-Resistant Metallic Reinforcement
Description:
Abstract
Axial compression performance of concrete columns reinforced with 2304 duplex stainless bars and spirals, carbon steel bars and spirals, and 316L stainless steel clad bars, in varying combinations is examined when the columns are exposed to corrosion.
Two groups of columns were investigated: a control group, and a group submerged in a 5.
0% by weight chloride solution subjected to accelerated corrosion.
A relatively high corrosion rate of 8.
5 μA/mm2 was used.
After 60 days of corrosion the columns were tested to failure under axial compression.
In terms of mass loss per unit of corrosion energy, columns reinforced with stainless steel spirals and either solid stainless or stainless clad vertical bars were 197% more corrosion resistant than carbon steel.
Bars made with 2304 stainless steel and 316L stainless clad materials developed localized pitting corrosion that led to degradation of the concrete cover and a larger drop in axial compression than carbon steel reinforced columns.
However, the all-carbon steel reinforced columns reached lower failure displacements and a corroded carbon steel reinforced column was the only column to experience sudden failure prior to reaching its theoretical maximum axial compression capacity.
Axial compression capacity of the columns in both the control and corroded conditions was modeled using concrete confinement models that produced very good agreement with the experimental results.
Related Results
Axial Compression Capacity of Concrete Columns Reinforced with Corrosion-Resistant Metallic Reinforcement
Axial Compression Capacity of Concrete Columns Reinforced with Corrosion-Resistant Metallic Reinforcement
Abstract
Axial compression performance of concrete columns reinforced with 2304 solid stainless bars and spirals, carbon steel bars and spirals, and 316L stainless steel cl...
Investigation of structural behavior of corroded RC columns
Investigation of structural behavior of corroded RC columns
Due to the reinforcement corrosion that occurs in reinforced concrete elements, the targeted performance levels of the structures are negatively affected. The main negative effects...
Investigation of structural behavior of corroded RC columns
Investigation of structural behavior of corroded RC columns
Due to the reinforcement corrosion that occurs in reinforced concrete elements, the targeted performance levels of the structures are negatively affected. The main negative effects...
Strength analysis of concrete-encased cellular steel columns
Strength analysis of concrete-encased cellular steel columns
This research investigates the compression behavior of bare cellular steel columns and concrete-encased cellular steel (CECS) columns subjected to concentric and eccentric loadings...
Enhancing structural behaviour of polypropylene fibre concrete columns longitudinally reinforced with fibreglass bars
Enhancing structural behaviour of polypropylene fibre concrete columns longitudinally reinforced with fibreglass bars
Abstract
The research aims to study the behaviour of concrete columns reinforced with fibreglass as bars exposed to seawater. Firstly, hardened concrete properties a...
The Effect of Compression Reinforcement on the Shear Behavior of Concrete Beams with Hybrid Reinforcement
The Effect of Compression Reinforcement on the Shear Behavior of Concrete Beams with Hybrid Reinforcement
Abstract
This study examines the impact of steel compression reinforcement on the shear behavior of concrete beams reinforced with glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bar...
Improvement of Seismic Performance of Ordinary Reinforced Partially Grouted Concrete Masonry Shear Walls
Improvement of Seismic Performance of Ordinary Reinforced Partially Grouted Concrete Masonry Shear Walls
Reinforced masonry constitutes about 10% of all low-rise construction in the US. Most of these structures are commercial and school buildings. It may also be used for multi-story h...
Study on the Structural Behavior of Circular Macro-Synthetic-Reinforced-Concrete Columns Reinforced by Polymeric Bars
Study on the Structural Behavior of Circular Macro-Synthetic-Reinforced-Concrete Columns Reinforced by Polymeric Bars
This study investigates the axial compression performance and theoretical analysis of macro-synthetic-fiber-reinforced
concrete (MSFRC) columns reinforced with carbon-fiber-reinfor...

