Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Machine Arguing: From Data and Rules to Argumentation Frameworks
View through CrossRef
Argumentation frameworks have been widely studied both in terms of formal properties they exhibit under different semantics and in terms of applications they can support. But where are argumentation frameworks coming from, and how can argumentation, a model-based approach to AI, beneficially integrate with the nowadays-much-widespread data-centric AI perspective? In this talk I will overview applications empowered by a variety of (extension-based and gradual) semantics for abstract and bipolar argumentation frameworks automatically obtained from data (including but not limited to text) and from logical rules. Some of these applications require the integration of argumentation and machine learning, and result in a mixed model-based and data-centric pipeline. For some applications, the semantics informs the definition of the frameworks rather than, as is conventionally the case, being enforced on frameworks a posteriori.
Title: Machine Arguing: From Data and Rules to Argumentation Frameworks
Description:
Argumentation frameworks have been widely studied both in terms of formal properties they exhibit under different semantics and in terms of applications they can support.
But where are argumentation frameworks coming from, and how can argumentation, a model-based approach to AI, beneficially integrate with the nowadays-much-widespread data-centric AI perspective? In this talk I will overview applications empowered by a variety of (extension-based and gradual) semantics for abstract and bipolar argumentation frameworks automatically obtained from data (including but not limited to text) and from logical rules.
Some of these applications require the integration of argumentation and machine learning, and result in a mixed model-based and data-centric pipeline.
For some applications, the semantics informs the definition of the frameworks rather than, as is conventionally the case, being enforced on frameworks a posteriori.
Related Results
Sincere and Insincere Arguing
Sincere and Insincere Arguing
Abstract: In this paper, we contend that there are two ways of arguing, namely sincere and insincere arguing. We draw such a distinction, based on the felicity conditions of the co...
A logic of defeasible argumentation: Constructing arguments in justification logic
A logic of defeasible argumentation: Constructing arguments in justification logic
In the 1980s, Pollock’s work on default reasons started the quest in the AI community for a formal system of defeasible argumentation. The main goal of this paper is to provide a l...
Argumentation and explainable artificial intelligence: a survey
Argumentation and explainable artificial intelligence: a survey
AbstractArgumentation and eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) are closely related, as in the recent years, Argumentation has been used for providing Explainability to AI. Arg...
Phys’AR as a Learning Innovation: Strengthening Critical Thinking and Argumentation Skills in Applied Physics
Phys’AR as a Learning Innovation: Strengthening Critical Thinking and Argumentation Skills in Applied Physics
Critical thinking and argumentation are essential twenty-first-century skills in physics education. Yet, conventional teaching methods often fail to provide students with sufficien...
Kettle logic in abstract argumentation
Kettle logic in abstract argumentation
Abstract
Kettle logic is a colloquial term that describes an agent’s advancement of inconsistent arguments in order to defeat a particular claim. Intuitively, a cons...
On Extension Counting Problems in Argumentation Frameworks
On Extension Counting Problems in Argumentation Frameworks
We consider the problem of counting (without explicitly enumerating) extensions prescribed by multiple-status semantics in abstract argumentation. Referring to Dung's traditional s...
Credulous and Skeptical Acceptance in Incomplete Argumentation Frameworks
Credulous and Skeptical Acceptance in Incomplete Argumentation Frameworks
We propose natural generalizations of the credulous and skeptical acceptance problems in abstract argumentation for incomplete argumentation frameworks [3]. This continues earlier ...
Advanced frameworks for fraud detection leveraging quantum machine learning and data science in fintech ecosystems
Advanced frameworks for fraud detection leveraging quantum machine learning and data science in fintech ecosystems
The rapid expansion of the fintech sector has brought with it an increasing demand for robust and sophisticated fraud detection systems capable of managing large volumes of financi...

