Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Phys’AR as a Learning Innovation: Strengthening Critical Thinking and Argumentation Skills in Applied Physics

View through CrossRef
Critical thinking and argumentation are essential twenty-first-century skills in physics education. Yet, conventional teaching methods often fail to provide students with sufficient opportunities to practice and develop these abilities. To address this challenge, this study introduced Phys’AR, an Augmented Reality (AR)–based learning medium designed not only to visualize abstract physics concepts but also to embed structured activities for constructing and evaluating arguments. The study employed an explanatory sequential mixed methods design involving 42 undergraduate students of physics education, divided into a 2023 control group and a 2024 experimental group. Quantitative data on critical thinking and argumentation skills were collected through standardized tests and analyzed using normality tests, homogeneity tests, and independent samples t-tests, while qualitative insights were gathered from classroom observations and student interviews. The findings showed that students in the experimental group significantly outperformed those in the control group in critical thinking, with higher post-test averages and more consistent score improvements. Analysis of argumentation revealed that students supported their claims with stronger data when learning with Phys’AR. However, most remained at a medium level in warrants and backings, and rebuttals were generally weak across both groups. These results indicate that Phys’AR is effective in strengthening evidence-based reasoning but requires complementary teaching strategies to promote deeper theoretical justification and counter-argumentation. The novelty of this study lies in extending the role of AR in physics education from a visualization tool to a platform for argumentation and critical reasoning. By highlighting which components of argumentation benefit most from AR and which require additional scaffolding, this research contributes both theoretical and practical insights for advancing critical thinking and argumentation in physics education.
Title: Phys’AR as a Learning Innovation: Strengthening Critical Thinking and Argumentation Skills in Applied Physics
Description:
Critical thinking and argumentation are essential twenty-first-century skills in physics education.
Yet, conventional teaching methods often fail to provide students with sufficient opportunities to practice and develop these abilities.
To address this challenge, this study introduced Phys’AR, an Augmented Reality (AR)–based learning medium designed not only to visualize abstract physics concepts but also to embed structured activities for constructing and evaluating arguments.
The study employed an explanatory sequential mixed methods design involving 42 undergraduate students of physics education, divided into a 2023 control group and a 2024 experimental group.
Quantitative data on critical thinking and argumentation skills were collected through standardized tests and analyzed using normality tests, homogeneity tests, and independent samples t-tests, while qualitative insights were gathered from classroom observations and student interviews.
The findings showed that students in the experimental group significantly outperformed those in the control group in critical thinking, with higher post-test averages and more consistent score improvements.
Analysis of argumentation revealed that students supported their claims with stronger data when learning with Phys’AR.
However, most remained at a medium level in warrants and backings, and rebuttals were generally weak across both groups.
These results indicate that Phys’AR is effective in strengthening evidence-based reasoning but requires complementary teaching strategies to promote deeper theoretical justification and counter-argumentation.
The novelty of this study lies in extending the role of AR in physics education from a visualization tool to a platform for argumentation and critical reasoning.
By highlighting which components of argumentation benefit most from AR and which require additional scaffolding, this research contributes both theoretical and practical insights for advancing critical thinking and argumentation in physics education.

Related Results

Academic management strategies of secondary schools in Cambodia based on the concept of innovation leadership skills
Academic management strategies of secondary schools in Cambodia based on the concept of innovation leadership skills
This study aimed to 1) study conceptual frameworks of academic management of secondary schools in Cambodia and innovation leadership skills, 2) study students’ innovation leadershi...
A Systematic Literature Review of Research Trends on Critical Thinking Skills
A Systematic Literature Review of Research Trends on Critical Thinking Skills
Human resources that can face the challenges of increasingly rapid and dynamic development must have high intellectual skills. High intellectual skills are characterized by critica...
KEMAMPUAN MENULIS ARGUMENTASI MAHASISWA Survei pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta
KEMAMPUAN MENULIS ARGUMENTASI MAHASISWA Survei pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta
This research is aimed to determine the correlation between (1) grammatical competency and the ability in writing argumentation, (2) attitude toward Indonesian language and the abi...
Critical Thinking Development Model in Nature Elementary School
Critical Thinking Development Model in Nature Elementary School
ABSTRACT This study aims to determine: 1) School programs aimed at developing critical thinking; 2) Preparation of learning aimed at developing critical thinking; 3) Imple...
Argumentation In Flux (Modelling Change in the Theory of Argumentation)
Argumentation In Flux (Modelling Change in the Theory of Argumentation)
Argumentation In Flux (Modélisation du changement dans la théorie de l'argumentation) Abstract argumentation frameworks are a widely used formalism in the field of ...
Reflections Of Zoltan P. Dienes On Mathematics Education
Reflections Of Zoltan P. Dienes On Mathematics Education
The name of Zoltan P. Dienes (1916- ) stands with those ofJean Piaget, Jerome Bruner, Edward Begle, and Robert Davis as legendary figures whose work left a lasting impression on th...
Analysis Of Students' Critical Thinking Skills On The Material Of Flat Shapes In The Fifth Grade Of Tindoi State Elementary School
Analysis Of Students' Critical Thinking Skills On The Material Of Flat Shapes In The Fifth Grade Of Tindoi State Elementary School
The ability to think critically is one of the abilities that must be mastered by students and has an important role in the mathematics learning process. Based on initial observatio...
Skills in European higher education mobility programmes: outlining a conceptual framework
Skills in European higher education mobility programmes: outlining a conceptual framework
PurposeCredit mobility has been acknowledged not only to broaden personal and intellectual horizons but also to have positive effects on the skills development and employability of...

Back to Top