Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Argumentation Logic
View through CrossRef
We propose a novel logic-based argumentation framework, called Argumentation Logic (AL), built upon a restriction of classical Propositional Logic (PL) as its underlying logic. This allows us to control the application of Reduction ad Absurdum (RA). In the case of classically consistent theories, AL and PL are equivalent, and RA is recovered through a notion of (non-)acceptability of arguments. In the case of classically inconsistent theories, AL is an extension of PL that does not trivialize, enjoying good logic-based argumentation and general logical properties.
Title: Argumentation Logic
Description:
We propose a novel logic-based argumentation framework, called Argumentation Logic (AL), built upon a restriction of classical Propositional Logic (PL) as its underlying logic.
This allows us to control the application of Reduction ad Absurdum (RA).
In the case of classically consistent theories, AL and PL are equivalent, and RA is recovered through a notion of (non-)acceptability of arguments.
In the case of classically inconsistent theories, AL is an extension of PL that does not trivialize, enjoying good logic-based argumentation and general logical properties.
Related Results
A logic of defeasible argumentation: Constructing arguments in justification logic
A logic of defeasible argumentation: Constructing arguments in justification logic
In the 1980s, Pollock’s work on default reasons started the quest in the AI community for a formal system of defeasible argumentation. The main goal of this paper is to provide a l...
Kettle logic in abstract argumentation
Kettle logic in abstract argumentation
Abstract
Kettle logic is a colloquial term that describes an agent’s advancement of inconsistent arguments in order to defeat a particular claim. Intuitively, a cons...
Argumentation and explainable artificial intelligence: a survey
Argumentation and explainable artificial intelligence: a survey
AbstractArgumentation and eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) are closely related, as in the recent years, Argumentation has been used for providing Explainability to AI. Arg...
Phys’AR as a Learning Innovation: Strengthening Critical Thinking and Argumentation Skills in Applied Physics
Phys’AR as a Learning Innovation: Strengthening Critical Thinking and Argumentation Skills in Applied Physics
Critical thinking and argumentation are essential twenty-first-century skills in physics education. Yet, conventional teaching methods often fail to provide students with sufficien...
Rationality and Logic
Rationality and Logic
An argument that logic is intrinsically psychological and human psychology is intrinsically logical, and that the connection between human rationality and logic is both constitutiv...
Greek and Roman Logic
Greek and Roman Logic
In ancient philosophy, there is no discipline called “logic” in the contemporary sense of “the study of formally valid arguments.” Rather, once a subfield of philosophy comes to be...
Impact of Dialogic Argumentation Pedagogy on Grade 8 Students’ Epistemic Knowledge of Science
Impact of Dialogic Argumentation Pedagogy on Grade 8 Students’ Epistemic Knowledge of Science
This study explores the effect of dialogic argumentation on grade 8 students’ epistemic knowledge of science in physics. A quasi-experimental design was employed to compare experim...
L’argumentation sur la titulature impériale dans la dynastie Ming au prisme de la « Théorie généralisée de l’argumentation »
L’argumentation sur la titulature impériale dans la dynastie Ming au prisme de la « Théorie généralisée de l’argumentation »
Le recours à la « Théorie généralisée de l’argumentation » cherche à dégager les règles et les structures de l’argumentation dans la controverse dite du « Grand Rituel » autour de ...