Javascript must be enabled to continue!
University rankings and sustainable development: the state of the art
View through CrossRef
Purpose
In light of the growing emphasis on sustainability in higher education, this paper aims to explore the effectiveness of sustainability university rankings, specifically focusing on sustainable development (SD), to understand their impact on advancing universities’ sustainability goals and address gaps in practical implications and limitations.
Design/methodology/approach
This study examines sustainability rankings in higher education (HE) through document analysis. Chosen for significance, these rankings were evaluated for regional participation, criteria and the top 20 universities. The method involved scrutinising official ranking websites for diverse perspectives on sustainability. The results are classified into three categories: regional participation, assessment criteria and top universities in the latest iterations.
Findings
The findings show that sustainability rankings are widely spread, and their existence has led to an increased motivation for universities to further engage in efforts in the field of SD. This study offers suggestions for optimising the role of promoting SD principles and practices in HE.
Originality/value
This comprehensive assessment sheds light on rankings’ operations and success levels. It makes a significant contribution to the literature, providing an unprecedented overview of analysed rankings and on sustainability assessment and their impact. This analysis will be valuable for universities towards the integration of SD principles and practices into the HE environment.
Emerald
Title: University rankings and sustainable development: the state of the art
Description:
Purpose
In light of the growing emphasis on sustainability in higher education, this paper aims to explore the effectiveness of sustainability university rankings, specifically focusing on sustainable development (SD), to understand their impact on advancing universities’ sustainability goals and address gaps in practical implications and limitations.
Design/methodology/approach
This study examines sustainability rankings in higher education (HE) through document analysis.
Chosen for significance, these rankings were evaluated for regional participation, criteria and the top 20 universities.
The method involved scrutinising official ranking websites for diverse perspectives on sustainability.
The results are classified into three categories: regional participation, assessment criteria and top universities in the latest iterations.
Findings
The findings show that sustainability rankings are widely spread, and their existence has led to an increased motivation for universities to further engage in efforts in the field of SD.
This study offers suggestions for optimising the role of promoting SD principles and practices in HE.
Originality/value
This comprehensive assessment sheds light on rankings’ operations and success levels.
It makes a significant contribution to the literature, providing an unprecedented overview of analysed rankings and on sustainability assessment and their impact.
This analysis will be valuable for universities towards the integration of SD principles and practices into the HE environment.
Related Results
Use and Perceived Impact of the County Health Rankings Report in Florida and North Carolina
Use and Perceived Impact of the County Health Rankings Report in Florida and North Carolina
Objective:
Examine overall level of and variation in local health department (LHD) use and perceived impact of the County Health Rankings report (Rankings) in Florida (...
Ilgtspējīgas attīstības sistēmanalīze = System analysis of sustainable development
Ilgtspējīgas attīstības sistēmanalīze = System analysis of sustainable development
Topic of the thesis: system analysis of sustainable development. Research hypothesis: sustainable development planning and monitoring model allows to assess the development of vari...
Association Between Institutional Social Media Involvement and Gastroenterology Divisional Rankings: Cohort Study (Preprint)
Association Between Institutional Social Media Involvement and Gastroenterology Divisional Rankings: Cohort Study (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
Patients often look to social media as an important tool to gather information about institutions and professionals. Since 1990, United States Ne...
Predição de Rankings de Artistas por Meio de Regressão
Predição de Rankings de Artistas por Meio de Regressão
A construção de rankings consiste na ordenação de resultados recuperados de acordo com um determinado critério. Os rankings podem fornecer informações relevantes para analistas de ...
Comparative Analysis of the Academic Performance of Research Universities in Türkiye Using MCDM Techniques
Comparative Analysis of the Academic Performance of Research Universities in Türkiye Using MCDM Techniques
With the increase in the number of universities in recent years, university rankings, which evaluate the success and development of universities, have become significantly importan...
Sustainable Development
Sustainable Development
Sustainable development is a concept that has quickly risen to prominence both in academic work and in policymaking at all levels, particularly since 1987 when the World Commission...
Sustainable Financing in Infrastructure Projects in Kenya
Sustainable Financing in Infrastructure Projects in Kenya
Sustainable finance refers to the process of taking environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations into account when making investment decisions in the financial sector,...
A Review of Russian-language Academic Literature on University Rankings with an Overview of Global Perspective
A Review of Russian-language Academic Literature on University Rankings with an Overview of Global Perspective
This year marks 10 years since the start of the Project 5-100. The key goal of the project was the entry of five Russian universities into the top 100 of global university rankings...

