Javascript must be enabled to continue!
University rankings and sustainable development: the state of the art
View through CrossRef
Purpose
In light of the growing emphasis on sustainability in higher education, this paper aims to explore the effectiveness of sustainability university rankings, specifically focusing on sustainable development (SD), to understand their impact on advancing universities’ sustainability goals and address gaps in practical implications and limitations.
Design/methodology/approach
This study examines sustainability rankings in higher education (HE) through document analysis. Chosen for significance, these rankings were evaluated for regional participation, criteria and the top 20 universities. The method involved scrutinising official ranking websites for diverse perspectives on sustainability. The results are classified into three categories: regional participation, assessment criteria and top universities in the latest iterations.
Findings
The findings show that sustainability rankings are widely spread, and their existence has led to an increased motivation for universities to further engage in efforts in the field of SD. This study offers suggestions for optimising the role of promoting SD principles and practices in HE.
Originality/value
This comprehensive assessment sheds light on rankings’ operations and success levels. It makes a significant contribution to the literature, providing an unprecedented overview of analysed rankings and on sustainability assessment and their impact. This analysis will be valuable for universities towards the integration of SD principles and practices into the HE environment.
Emerald
Title: University rankings and sustainable development: the state of the art
Description:
Purpose
In light of the growing emphasis on sustainability in higher education, this paper aims to explore the effectiveness of sustainability university rankings, specifically focusing on sustainable development (SD), to understand their impact on advancing universities’ sustainability goals and address gaps in practical implications and limitations.
Design/methodology/approach
This study examines sustainability rankings in higher education (HE) through document analysis.
Chosen for significance, these rankings were evaluated for regional participation, criteria and the top 20 universities.
The method involved scrutinising official ranking websites for diverse perspectives on sustainability.
The results are classified into three categories: regional participation, assessment criteria and top universities in the latest iterations.
Findings
The findings show that sustainability rankings are widely spread, and their existence has led to an increased motivation for universities to further engage in efforts in the field of SD.
This study offers suggestions for optimising the role of promoting SD principles and practices in HE.
Originality/value
This comprehensive assessment sheds light on rankings’ operations and success levels.
It makes a significant contribution to the literature, providing an unprecedented overview of analysed rankings and on sustainability assessment and their impact.
This analysis will be valuable for universities towards the integration of SD principles and practices into the HE environment.
Related Results
Climate Narratives and the Construction of Sustainability Discourses:Policy Instruments and their Influence on Sustainability Transitions in India
Climate Narratives and the Construction of Sustainability Discourses:Policy Instruments and their Influence on Sustainability Transitions in India
: Climate narratives linked to the Sustainable Development Goals present climate change as integral to development, equity, and social justice. They connect SDG 13 (Climate Action)...
Rankings of Countries Based on Rankings of Universities
Rankings of Countries Based on Rankings of Universities
Although many methods have been designed for ranking universities, there is no suitable system that focuses on the ranking of countries based on the performance of their universiti...
Ilgtspējīgas attīstības sistēmanalīze = System analysis of sustainable development
Ilgtspējīgas attīstības sistēmanalīze = System analysis of sustainable development
Topic of the thesis: system analysis of sustainable development. Research hypothesis: sustainable development planning and monitoring model allows to assess the development of vari...
Does conflict of interest distort global university rankings?
Does conflict of interest distort global university rankings?
Abstract
Global university rankings influence students’ choices and higher education policies throughout the world. When rankers not only evaluate universities but also provide the...
Association Between Institutional Social Media Involvement and Gastroenterology Divisional Rankings: Cohort Study (Preprint)
Association Between Institutional Social Media Involvement and Gastroenterology Divisional Rankings: Cohort Study (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
Patients often look to social media as an important tool to gather information about institutions and professionals. Since 1990, United States Ne...
Using Automated Accessibility Metering Tools in Transparency Rankings in Brazil
Using Automated Accessibility Metering Tools in Transparency Rankings in Brazil
Introduction: Transparency and the right to information are vital in promoting accountability and combating corruption in public organizations. In Brazil, Law 12527/2011 (LAI) esta...
University Rankings and Goals: A Cluster Analysis
University Rankings and Goals: A Cluster Analysis
Nowadays, university rankings are used to assess all aspects of universities. Due to the impact of university rankings on assessing the performance of universities, this research a...
COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY IN THE SYSTEM OF A MULTILEVEL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ECONOMY
COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY IN THE SYSTEM OF A MULTILEVEL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ECONOMY
It is substantiated that under contemporary challenges, including those caused by the war in Ukraine, commercial activity extends beyond a purely instrumental approach focused on a...

