Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Sexual Satisfaction among Patients with Erectile Dysfunction Treated with Counseling, Sildenafil, or Both

View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT Introduction Sexual satisfaction is linked to life satisfaction, and erectile dysfunction (ED) may lead to an impaired quality of life (QOL). Aim Our goal was to evaluate the QOL among Brazilian patients with ED, before and after three kinds of treatment. Methods Men aged 25–55 years, with a diagnosis of psychogenic or mixed ED, according to the Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition, and the Standard Practice in Sexual Medicine, were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: counseling, sildenafil, and sildenafil plus counseling. At baseline each group had 40 patients. Sildenafil was provided in 50 mg that could be adjusted to 100 mg. The patients could initially take one to two tablets per week and the entire treatment lasted for 3 months. Counseling was provided in group sessions that took place once a week. They were evaluated at baseline and after 3 months of treatment with the Male Sexual Quotient (MSQ) and the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM). Main Outcome Measures The correlation between the patients' MSQ score and scores on the SHIM. Results One hundred seventeen patients were enrolled. The three groups were similar according to age, marital status, mean time of ED, and ED severity and etiology. At baseline, MSQ and SHIM total scores were not different among the three groups. MSQ scores increased from 41.2 ± 15.3, 38.7 ± 18.0, and 46.8 ± 17.0 to 48.5 ± 15.3, 63.8 ± 21.6, and 70.0 ± 17.3 after counseling, sildenafil, and sildenafil plus counseling, respectively (P < 0.05). SHIM scores also increased significantly (9.6 ± 4.1, 9.7 ± 4.1, and 10.2 ± 3.9 to 12.1 ± 3.9, 16.7 ± 5.6, and 17.7 ± 4.5 after counseling, sildenafil, and sildenafil plus counseling, respectively) (P < 0.05). There were no serious adverse events related to sildenafil, and no patient was withdrawn from the study because of an adverse event. Conclusions The three treatments were significantly efficient, and the best treatment was sildenafil associated with counseling.
Title: Sexual Satisfaction among Patients with Erectile Dysfunction Treated with Counseling, Sildenafil, or Both
Description:
ABSTRACT Introduction Sexual satisfaction is linked to life satisfaction, and erectile dysfunction (ED) may lead to an impaired quality of life (QOL).
Aim Our goal was to evaluate the QOL among Brazilian patients with ED, before and after three kinds of treatment.
Methods Men aged 25–55 years, with a diagnosis of psychogenic or mixed ED, according to the Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition, and the Standard Practice in Sexual Medicine, were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: counseling, sildenafil, and sildenafil plus counseling.
At baseline each group had 40 patients.
Sildenafil was provided in 50 mg that could be adjusted to 100 mg.
The patients could initially take one to two tablets per week and the entire treatment lasted for 3 months.
Counseling was provided in group sessions that took place once a week.
They were evaluated at baseline and after 3 months of treatment with the Male Sexual Quotient (MSQ) and the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM).
Main Outcome Measures The correlation between the patients' MSQ score and scores on the SHIM.
Results One hundred seventeen patients were enrolled.
The three groups were similar according to age, marital status, mean time of ED, and ED severity and etiology.
At baseline, MSQ and SHIM total scores were not different among the three groups.
MSQ scores increased from 41.
2 ± 15.
3, 38.
7 ± 18.
0, and 46.
8 ± 17.
0 to 48.
5 ± 15.
3, 63.
8 ± 21.
6, and 70.
0 ± 17.
3 after counseling, sildenafil, and sildenafil plus counseling, respectively (P < 0.
05).
SHIM scores also increased significantly (9.
6 ± 4.
1, 9.
7 ± 4.
1, and 10.
2 ± 3.
9 to 12.
1 ± 3.
9, 16.
7 ± 5.
6, and 17.
7 ± 4.
5 after counseling, sildenafil, and sildenafil plus counseling, respectively) (P < 0.
05).
There were no serious adverse events related to sildenafil, and no patient was withdrawn from the study because of an adverse event.
Conclusions The three treatments were significantly efficient, and the best treatment was sildenafil associated with counseling.

Related Results

Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Clinical Pharmacology of Sildenafil in Infants and Children
Clinical Pharmacology of Sildenafil in Infants and Children
Sildenafil is a competitive and selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 5. Sildenafil is cleared by hepatic CYP3A (major route) and CYP2C9 (minor route) and concomitant administra...
Unraveling the intersection of sleep disorders and erectile dysfunction: Outcomes from two EPISONO editions
Unraveling the intersection of sleep disorders and erectile dysfunction: Outcomes from two EPISONO editions
AbstractBackgroundThere is growing interest in the relationship between sleep disorders and erectile dysfunction. We present the results from a 2015 follow‐up study in relation to ...
Neurological Outcome in Children Post–Sildenafil Therapy for Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn
Neurological Outcome in Children Post–Sildenafil Therapy for Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn
Abstract Purpose: Evaluation of neurological outcome post sildenafil and inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) therapy in the first 72-months of life. Material and Methods: Prospectiv...

Back to Top