Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of Satisfaction With Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Patients With Radical Prostatectomy or Radical Cystoprostatectomy to the General Population

View through CrossRef
AbstractIntroductionPenile prosthesis implantation is a widely used treatment option for erectile dysfunction. Data is limited with regard to patient satisfaction with a penile prosthesis following radical prostatectomy/cystoprostatectomy vs patients with erectile dysfunction of other etiologies.AimTo examine patient satisfaction with penile prosthesis implantation and determine if a difference in satisfaction exists in post-prostatectomy/cystoprostatectomy patients vs patients with erectile dysfunction of other etiologies. We hypothesize that etiology does not affect satisfaction.MethodsA total of 164 patients underwent penile prosthesis implantation at our institution between August 2017 and December 2019, with 102 patients completing a validated 14 item questionnaire, Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS), at 6 months postoperation. Demographics, surgical characteristics, and erectile dysfunction etiology were recorded. Patients were assigned to one of 2 groups: postprostatectomy/postcystoprostatectomy erectile dysfunction or other etiologies. The study group was further analyzed between radical prostatectomy or radical cystoprostatectomy.Main Outcome MeasuresSatisfaction based on key EDITS questions with postradical prostatectomy/cystoprostatectomy vs patients with erectile dysfunction of other etiologies.ResultsResponses to 3 questions were analyzed: overall satisfaction, expectations met in the past 4 weeks, and confidence in the ability to participate in sexual activity. Chi-square analysis was performed to determine the difference in responses. No difference was seen in overall satisfaction (P = .96), expectations (P = .78), or confidence (P = .78) between groups. On subgroup analysis, there was no difference in reported overall satisfaction (P = .47) or confidence (P = .080) between postprostatectomy and postcystoprostatectomy patients. Postprostatectomy and postcystoprostatectomy patients differed in whether the penile prosthesis implantation met expectations (P = .033). Postprostatectomy patients reported a mean score of 3.5/4 compared to postcystoprostatectomy patients, who reported a mean of 3.0/4.ConclusionsOur analysis suggests that key erectile function scores are not significantly different between postprostatectomy/postcystoprostatectomy patients compared to other etiologies. The difference in measures between postprostatectomy and postcystoprostatectomy patients is not significant or of unclear significance.Registration # of clinical trial: HSC-MS-19-0320Howell S, Palasi S, Green T, et al. Comparison of Satisfaction With Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Patients With Radical Prostatectomy or Radical Cystoprostatectomy to the General Population. Sex Med 2021;9:100300.
Title: Comparison of Satisfaction With Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Patients With Radical Prostatectomy or Radical Cystoprostatectomy to the General Population
Description:
AbstractIntroductionPenile prosthesis implantation is a widely used treatment option for erectile dysfunction.
Data is limited with regard to patient satisfaction with a penile prosthesis following radical prostatectomy/cystoprostatectomy vs patients with erectile dysfunction of other etiologies.
AimTo examine patient satisfaction with penile prosthesis implantation and determine if a difference in satisfaction exists in post-prostatectomy/cystoprostatectomy patients vs patients with erectile dysfunction of other etiologies.
We hypothesize that etiology does not affect satisfaction.
MethodsA total of 164 patients underwent penile prosthesis implantation at our institution between August 2017 and December 2019, with 102 patients completing a validated 14 item questionnaire, Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS), at 6 months postoperation.
Demographics, surgical characteristics, and erectile dysfunction etiology were recorded.
Patients were assigned to one of 2 groups: postprostatectomy/postcystoprostatectomy erectile dysfunction or other etiologies.
The study group was further analyzed between radical prostatectomy or radical cystoprostatectomy.
Main Outcome MeasuresSatisfaction based on key EDITS questions with postradical prostatectomy/cystoprostatectomy vs patients with erectile dysfunction of other etiologies.
ResultsResponses to 3 questions were analyzed: overall satisfaction, expectations met in the past 4 weeks, and confidence in the ability to participate in sexual activity.
Chi-square analysis was performed to determine the difference in responses.
No difference was seen in overall satisfaction (P = .
96), expectations (P = .
78), or confidence (P = .
78) between groups.
On subgroup analysis, there was no difference in reported overall satisfaction (P = .
47) or confidence (P = .
080) between postprostatectomy and postcystoprostatectomy patients.
Postprostatectomy and postcystoprostatectomy patients differed in whether the penile prosthesis implantation met expectations (P = .
033).
Postprostatectomy patients reported a mean score of 3.
5/4 compared to postcystoprostatectomy patients, who reported a mean of 3.
0/4.
ConclusionsOur analysis suggests that key erectile function scores are not significantly different between postprostatectomy/postcystoprostatectomy patients compared to other etiologies.
The difference in measures between postprostatectomy and postcystoprostatectomy patients is not significant or of unclear significance.
Registration # of clinical trial: HSC-MS-19-0320Howell S, Palasi S, Green T, et al.
Comparison of Satisfaction With Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Patients With Radical Prostatectomy or Radical Cystoprostatectomy to the General Population.
Sex Med 2021;9:100300.

Related Results

Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Penile prosthesis – a viable solution for erectile dysfunction refractory to conservative therapy
Penile prosthesis – a viable solution for erectile dysfunction refractory to conservative therapy
Introduction: Erectile dysfunction(ED) is a serious condition which can affect men of all ages, with an important impact over the quality of life. When conservative therapy fails,...
Flaccid penile length and stretch factor in the newborn
Flaccid penile length and stretch factor in the newborn
Objective: Little is known about the flaccid penile length in the newborn and the degree of stretch of the penis among investigators while measuring the stretched penile length. Th...
Outcome of Malleable Penile Implant and End Stage of Erectile Dysfunction Single Centre Experience
Outcome of Malleable Penile Implant and End Stage of Erectile Dysfunction Single Centre Experience
Background: The inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is typically the preferred implant for Peronei’s disease (PD) and malleable penile prostheses (MPPs) have been discouraged. ...
Attitudes Toward Penile Transplantation Among Urologists and Health Professionals
Attitudes Toward Penile Transplantation Among Urologists and Health Professionals
Abstract Introduction Penile transplantation, in its infancy, has the potential to reestablish functional outcomes for men with ...
Clinical Presentation of Peyronie’s Disease: A Retrospective Study of 564 Cases
Clinical Presentation of Peyronie’s Disease: A Retrospective Study of 564 Cases
Peyronie’s disease (PD) affects the penile albuginea, resulting in penile deformity, pain, erectile dysfunction (ED), and an anxious–depressive state. PD diagnosis involves a thoro...

Back to Top