Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

6. Examination-in-chief

View through CrossRef
The questioning of witnesses, which generally falls into three stages known as examination-in-chief, cross-examination, and re-examination, is central to the English adversary system of justice. This chapter focuses on the first stage, examination-in-chief. In this stage the party calling a witness, or counsel on his behalf, will seek to elicit evidence that supports his version of the facts in issue. The discussions cover young and vulnerable witnesses; the rule against leading questions and the exceptions to the rule; refreshing the memory in court and out of court; the rule against previous consistent or self-serving statements and the common law exceptions to the rule (complaints in sexual cases, statements admissible to rebut allegations of recent fabrication, statements made on accusation, previous identification, statements admissible as part of the res gestae and statements in documents used to refresh the memory and received in evidence); and unfavourable and hostile witnesses.
Oxford University Press
Title: 6. Examination-in-chief
Description:
The questioning of witnesses, which generally falls into three stages known as examination-in-chief, cross-examination, and re-examination, is central to the English adversary system of justice.
This chapter focuses on the first stage, examination-in-chief.
In this stage the party calling a witness, or counsel on his behalf, will seek to elicit evidence that supports his version of the facts in issue.
The discussions cover young and vulnerable witnesses; the rule against leading questions and the exceptions to the rule; refreshing the memory in court and out of court; the rule against previous consistent or self-serving statements and the common law exceptions to the rule (complaints in sexual cases, statements admissible to rebut allegations of recent fabrication, statements made on accusation, previous identification, statements admissible as part of the res gestae and statements in documents used to refresh the memory and received in evidence); and unfavourable and hostile witnesses.

Related Results

Chief Joseph
Chief Joseph
This biography offers a chronological presentation of the major events in Nez Perce history and in the life of one of their greatest leaders, Joseph. Chief Joseph: A Biography...
Judicial tax examination
Judicial tax examination
The textbook discusses the theoretical and practical aspects of the production of judicial tax expertise as an independent type, included in the class of judicial economic expertis...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court
An insightful, chronological—by chief justice—examination of the Supreme Court that enables students and readers to understand and appreciate the constitutional role the Court play...
The Board Examination
The Board Examination
This chapter is aimed primarily at candidates preparing for the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM's) certifying or maintenance of certification examination in...
Examination Techniques in Orthopaedics
Examination Techniques in Orthopaedics
Examination Techniques in Orthopaedics comprehensively covers the basic examination skills and important special tests needed to evaluate the adult and paediatric musculoskeletal s...
Neuropsychiatric assessment
Neuropsychiatric assessment
The chapter gives an approach to the neuropsychiatric assessment including the history, the mental state examination, and the neurological examination. History is vital to neuropsy...
R. Shlomo Goren
R. Shlomo Goren
This chapter grapples with the views of R. Shlomo Goren (1917–94), who served as Chief Ashkenazi Rabbi of the Israel Defense Forces and subsequently as Chief Rabbi of Israel. His p...
Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [2018] UKSC 4
Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [2018] UKSC 4
Essential Cases: Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Robinson v Chief Constable of W...

Back to Top