Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Immunosuppressant nonadherence profile in kidney transplant recipients and the impact of medication adherence on transplant outcomes
View through CrossRef
BackgroundDespite the fact that 1-year graft and recipient survival rates are above 90% in most transplant centers, improving long-term graft survival remains an important challenge. Immunosuppressant nonadherence has been recognized as one of the important risk factors for long-term graft failure. Understanding the modifiable correlates and risk factors for medication non-adherence is essential to develop interventions to improve adherence and thus long-term transplantation outcomes.MethodsThis study conducted a questionnaire survey on 431 renal transplant recipients who were followed up in the outpatient clinic between January 2022 and January 2023, and 409 valid questionnaires were returned. The BAASIS questionnaire was used to assess the prevalence of nonadherence to immunosuppressive therapy (implementation phase) in Chinese renal transplant recipients and to explore the multilevel correlates of immunosuppressive nonadherence. The BAASIS questionnaire was used to categorize renal transplant recipients into adherent (n = 239) and non-adherent (n = 170) groups, and a prospective cohort study with a 1-year follow-up was conducted to explore the impact of immunosuppressant non-adherence on clinical outcomes.ResultsThe prevalence of nonadherence to immunosuppressant therapy in renal transplant recipients in this study was as high as 41.6%. The number of years post-transplant (OR: 1.240, 95% CI: 1.136–1.353, p < 0.001) and the frequency of twice-daily dosing (OR: 5.145, 95% CI: 2.690–9.840, p < 0.001) were positively correlated with immunosuppressive nonadherence. There was a significant difference in TAC IPV (Intra-individual Variability) between the adherent and nonadherent groups (22.7 ± 8.7 vs. 25.4 ± 11.6, p = 0.010). Renal function remained stable during the follow-up period in the recipients in the adherence group and tended to decrease in the recipients in the non-adherence group (F = 4.932, p = 0.001). The rates of graft loss (7.1% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.006) and rejection (12.4% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.002) were higher in the nonadherent group than in the adherent group.ConclusionLonger time post-transplant and higher frequency of immunosuppressive dosing were positively associated with nonadherence to immunosuppressives medication. Immunosuppressant nonadherence was associated with adverse graft outcomes.
Title: Immunosuppressant nonadherence profile in kidney transplant recipients and the impact of medication adherence on transplant outcomes
Description:
BackgroundDespite the fact that 1-year graft and recipient survival rates are above 90% in most transplant centers, improving long-term graft survival remains an important challenge.
Immunosuppressant nonadherence has been recognized as one of the important risk factors for long-term graft failure.
Understanding the modifiable correlates and risk factors for medication non-adherence is essential to develop interventions to improve adherence and thus long-term transplantation outcomes.
MethodsThis study conducted a questionnaire survey on 431 renal transplant recipients who were followed up in the outpatient clinic between January 2022 and January 2023, and 409 valid questionnaires were returned.
The BAASIS questionnaire was used to assess the prevalence of nonadherence to immunosuppressive therapy (implementation phase) in Chinese renal transplant recipients and to explore the multilevel correlates of immunosuppressive nonadherence.
The BAASIS questionnaire was used to categorize renal transplant recipients into adherent (n = 239) and non-adherent (n = 170) groups, and a prospective cohort study with a 1-year follow-up was conducted to explore the impact of immunosuppressant non-adherence on clinical outcomes.
ResultsThe prevalence of nonadherence to immunosuppressant therapy in renal transplant recipients in this study was as high as 41.
6%.
The number of years post-transplant (OR: 1.
240, 95% CI: 1.
136–1.
353, p < 0.
001) and the frequency of twice-daily dosing (OR: 5.
145, 95% CI: 2.
690–9.
840, p < 0.
001) were positively correlated with immunosuppressive nonadherence.
There was a significant difference in TAC IPV (Intra-individual Variability) between the adherent and nonadherent groups (22.
7 ± 8.
7 vs.
25.
4 ± 11.
6, p = 0.
010).
Renal function remained stable during the follow-up period in the recipients in the adherence group and tended to decrease in the recipients in the non-adherence group (F = 4.
932, p = 0.
001).
The rates of graft loss (7.
1% vs.
1.
7%, p = 0.
006) and rejection (12.
4% vs.
4.
2%, p = 0.
002) were higher in the nonadherent group than in the adherent group.
ConclusionLonger time post-transplant and higher frequency of immunosuppressive dosing were positively associated with nonadherence to immunosuppressives medication.
Immunosuppressant nonadherence was associated with adverse graft outcomes.
Related Results
NICU Medication Errors: Describing the Cause and Nature of Medication Errors in a NICU in Qatar
NICU Medication Errors: Describing the Cause and Nature of Medication Errors in a NICU in Qatar
IntroductionA medication error can be defined as “any error occurring in the medication use process” and focuses on problems with the delivery of medication to a patient [1]. Medic...
P4-12-12: Patient-, Illness-, and/or Treatment-Related Baseline Predictors of Nonadherence to Oral Hormonal Therapy.
P4-12-12: Patient-, Illness-, and/or Treatment-Related Baseline Predictors of Nonadherence to Oral Hormonal Therapy.
Abstract
Background: Nonadherence to oral hormonal therapy is problematic for women with breast cancer. Patient-, illness-, and treatment-related factors have been a...
INTERVENTION TO IMPROVE MEDICAL ADHERENCE IN PEDIATRIC KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
INTERVENTION TO IMPROVE MEDICAL ADHERENCE IN PEDIATRIC KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
Background: Adolescent age at transplantation has long been recognized as a risk factor for graft failure, and a major contributor might be medical nonadherence. Many interventions...
Medication Nonadherence: Implications for patient health outcomes in pharmacy practice
Medication Nonadherence: Implications for patient health outcomes in pharmacy practice
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The primary objective of this review is (1) to better understand the prevalence and impact of medication nonadherence, (2) to identify risk factors for medica...
Abstract 2233: Biobehavioral Factors and Heart Failure Medication Adherence
Abstract 2233: Biobehavioral Factors and Heart Failure Medication Adherence
Background:
Medication adherence in heart failure (HF) patients reduces hospitalizations and improves outcomes, yet it is variable. This study evaluated adherence rates...
642-P: Discovering Nonadherence to Diabetes Medications—Which Questions Are Most Effective?
642-P: Discovering Nonadherence to Diabetes Medications—Which Questions Are Most Effective?
Half of patients with diabetes have difficulty taking medications as directed, creating a major barrier to glycemic control. In studies outside of diabetes, specific, negatively-fr...
Prevalence of Medication Nonadherence among Osteoporosis Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
Prevalence of Medication Nonadherence among Osteoporosis Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
Abstract
Background:
Despite the wide use of effective anti-osteoporotic therapies, adherence remains suboptimal worldwide, in...
Comparison of the Quality of Life and Emotional Responses in Kidney Transplant Recipients from Living and Deceased Donors in Nephrology Clinics
Comparison of the Quality of Life and Emotional Responses in Kidney Transplant Recipients from Living and Deceased Donors in Nephrology Clinics
Background: Quality of life (QoL) is one of the essential measures in assessing a patient's status after kidney transplant, and emotional response is an important factor in evaluat...

