Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of the Quality of Life and Emotional Responses in Kidney Transplant Recipients from Living and Deceased Donors in Nephrology Clinics

View through CrossRef
Background: Quality of life (QoL) is one of the essential measures in assessing a patient's status after kidney transplant, and emotional response is an important factor in evaluating the patient’s compatibility with the transplant. Also, emotional response affects a patient’s QoL. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the QoL and emotional responses of kidney recipients from deceased and living donors. Methods: This descriptive comparative study randomly selected 118 kidney transplant patients (67 recipients from living donors and 51 recipients from deceased) referred to the Nephrology Clinic of Tehran University of Medical Sciences for a post-surgery follow-up. The QoL questionnaire for patients with renal transplants introduced by Laupacis et al. and the emotional response questionnaire (ERQ) by Ziegelmann et al. were used in this study. For data analysis, Mann-Whitney, independent t-test, and Pearson’s correlation tests were used. All the analyses were performed using SPSS software version 20. Results: The kidney recipients from living donors had significantly higher QoL score (especially emotionally) compared with kidney recipients from deceased donors (P=0.04). The score of emotional response was higher in recipients from a living donor, which is related to feeling guilty, transplant disclosure. Furthermore, recipients from a living donor felt guiltier and were unwilling to disclose their transplant compared with recipients from deceased donors. Conclusions: Feeling of guilt and being anxious about transplant disclosure were higher in recipients from living donors. A significant difference was observed in the QoL and emotional response between the two groups of kidney recipients. Therefore, it is important to involve the transplant team, specifically nurses, in the identification of emotional response and planning accordingly to improve the patients’ QoL, especially in recipients from a living donor.
Title: Comparison of the Quality of Life and Emotional Responses in Kidney Transplant Recipients from Living and Deceased Donors in Nephrology Clinics
Description:
Background: Quality of life (QoL) is one of the essential measures in assessing a patient's status after kidney transplant, and emotional response is an important factor in evaluating the patient’s compatibility with the transplant.
Also, emotional response affects a patient’s QoL.
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the QoL and emotional responses of kidney recipients from deceased and living donors.
Methods: This descriptive comparative study randomly selected 118 kidney transplant patients (67 recipients from living donors and 51 recipients from deceased) referred to the Nephrology Clinic of Tehran University of Medical Sciences for a post-surgery follow-up.
The QoL questionnaire for patients with renal transplants introduced by Laupacis et al.
and the emotional response questionnaire (ERQ) by Ziegelmann et al.
were used in this study.
For data analysis, Mann-Whitney, independent t-test, and Pearson’s correlation tests were used.
All the analyses were performed using SPSS software version 20.
Results: The kidney recipients from living donors had significantly higher QoL score (especially emotionally) compared with kidney recipients from deceased donors (P=0.
04).
The score of emotional response was higher in recipients from a living donor, which is related to feeling guilty, transplant disclosure.
Furthermore, recipients from a living donor felt guiltier and were unwilling to disclose their transplant compared with recipients from deceased donors.
Conclusions: Feeling of guilt and being anxious about transplant disclosure were higher in recipients from living donors.
A significant difference was observed in the QoL and emotional response between the two groups of kidney recipients.
Therefore, it is important to involve the transplant team, specifically nurses, in the identification of emotional response and planning accordingly to improve the patients’ QoL, especially in recipients from a living donor.

Related Results

Rethinking Anticoagulation in Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplantation
Rethinking Anticoagulation in Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplantation
BackgroundA clinical dilemma exists in patients with CKD, ESKD, and after kidney transplantation, as they face concurrent risks of both thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications...
Pretransplantation assessment of BK virus seropositivity in kidney donors and recipients
Pretransplantation assessment of BK virus seropositivity in kidney donors and recipients
Background: BK virus (BKV) is a member of the polyomavirus family. The determination of anti-BKV immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody levels in kidney donors and rec...
Hepatitis E Viraemia in Transplant Recipients
Hepatitis E Viraemia in Transplant Recipients
Abstract Introduction: Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) is one of the leading causes of acute infectious hepatitis worldwide; while usually a s...
An internet-based expressive writing intervention for kidney transplant recipients
An internet-based expressive writing intervention for kidney transplant recipients
Background: Previous research has found that psychiatric problems and stress in kidney transplant recipients negatively impact upon their quality of life (QOL) and how they heal fr...
P1796FACTORS PREDICTING SUBCUTANEOUS INSULIN REQUIREMENT AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANT
P1796FACTORS PREDICTING SUBCUTANEOUS INSULIN REQUIREMENT AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANT
Abstract Background and Aims Diabetes is the most common cause for end stage renal disease leading to kidney transplant. Post tr...
Fracture Risk Among Living Kidney Donors 25 Years After Donation
Fracture Risk Among Living Kidney Donors 25 Years After Donation
ImportanceLiving kidney donors may have an increased risk of fractures due to reductions in kidney mass, lower concentrations of serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, and secondary increa...

Back to Top