Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Legal Liability of Ex-Directors for the Management of the Company During the term of Office Period Has Ended
View through CrossRef
This research aims to analyze the legal responsibility of former Directors for the management of the Company which was carried out when the term of office of the Directors and Board of Commissioners had ended before the re-appointment GMS was held. In this case, the Board of Directors is the organ of the Company which is fully responsible for the management of the Company and represents the Company both inside and outside the Court. Directors whose term of office ends do not automatically continue their position as before, except by re-appointment based on a GMS decision. So that the management carried out after the term of office ends may conflict with the law and the Company's articles of association. The approaches used are the statutory approach and the case approach. The results of legal actions carried out by former Directors while continuing to manage and represent the Company are illegal actions and can be held personally responsible. However, if it can be proven that the management actions are carried out in good faith for the sake of the law and provide good benefits for the Company and all of the Company's stakeholders, then based on the authority possessed by UUPT and the Company's articles of association, the GMS can decide to make all legal actions in the form of management. What is done by the former Director becomes a legal act and the Company's responsibility, so that the former Director is free from personal responsibility.
Yayasan Dharma Indonesia Tercinta (Dinasti)
Title: Legal Liability of Ex-Directors for the Management of the Company During the term of Office Period Has Ended
Description:
This research aims to analyze the legal responsibility of former Directors for the management of the Company which was carried out when the term of office of the Directors and Board of Commissioners had ended before the re-appointment GMS was held.
In this case, the Board of Directors is the organ of the Company which is fully responsible for the management of the Company and represents the Company both inside and outside the Court.
Directors whose term of office ends do not automatically continue their position as before, except by re-appointment based on a GMS decision.
So that the management carried out after the term of office ends may conflict with the law and the Company's articles of association.
The approaches used are the statutory approach and the case approach.
The results of legal actions carried out by former Directors while continuing to manage and represent the Company are illegal actions and can be held personally responsible.
However, if it can be proven that the management actions are carried out in good faith for the sake of the law and provide good benefits for the Company and all of the Company's stakeholders, then based on the authority possessed by UUPT and the Company's articles of association, the GMS can decide to make all legal actions in the form of management.
What is done by the former Director becomes a legal act and the Company's responsibility, so that the former Director is free from personal responsibility.
Related Results
Penerapan Prinsip Vicarious Liability dalam Pertanggungjawaban Perseroan Terbatas
Penerapan Prinsip Vicarious Liability dalam Pertanggungjawaban Perseroan Terbatas
AbstractA limited liability company is a legal subject capable of being responsible for the risks in carrying out its business. The principle of vicarious liability is the basis of...
On the concept of legal liability institutions
On the concept of legal liability institutions
The nature and distinguishing features of legal liability institutions in the legal system were analyzed. The tendency to define legal institutions in the branches of law solely th...
Pertanggungjawaban Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Yang Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Pertanggungjawaban Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Yang Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Abstract-Directors in a limited liability company can be likened to a life for the company. The Board of Directors in carrying out their duties in managing a limited liability comp...
A Phase 1b, Dose-Finding Study Of Ruxolitinib Plus Panobinostat In Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post–Polycythemia Vera MF (PPV-MF), Or Post–Essential Thrombocythemia MF (PET-MF): Identification Of The Recommended Phase 2 Dose
A Phase 1b, Dose-Finding Study Of Ruxolitinib Plus Panobinostat In Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post–Polycythemia Vera MF (PPV-MF), Or Post–Essential Thrombocythemia MF (PET-MF): Identification Of The Recommended Phase 2 Dose
Abstract
Background
Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with progressive, debilitating symptoms that ...
Combinatorial Antigen Targeting Strategy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Combinatorial Antigen Targeting Strategy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Introduction: Efforts to safely and effectively treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by targeting a single leukemia associated antigen with chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cells ...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
THE ANALOGY OF STATUTE AND THE ANALOGY OF LAW AS DOCTRINAL INSTRUMENTS FOR LEGAL RESPONSE TO ECONOMIC CHALLENGES
THE ANALOGY OF STATUTE AND THE ANALOGY OF LAW AS DOCTRINAL INSTRUMENTS FOR LEGAL RESPONSE TO ECONOMIC CHALLENGES
Ukraine's contemporary legal system is undergoing a period of significant transformation, which necessitates not only a robust and stable legal framework, but also a flexible doctr...
Dynamics of Mutations in Patients with ET Treated with Imetelstat
Dynamics of Mutations in Patients with ET Treated with Imetelstat
Abstract
Background: Imetelstat, a first in class specific telomerase inhibitor, induced hematologic responses in all patients (pts) with essential thrombocythemia (...

