Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Assumption of the Myths of Romantic Love: Its Relationship With Sex, Type of Sex-Affective Relationship, and Sexual Orientation

View through CrossRef
Romantic love promotes and lays the foundation for the development of hegemonic affective sex relationships, guiding the normative ways of feeling and experiencing love. This way of conceiving love is an intrinsic part of women's subordination, and it entails a greater tolerance for situations of violence in sex-affective relationships in which the exercise of asymmetric power relations between men and women is legitimized. With the current advent of the postmodern stage, a wide variety of dissident (non-heterosexual) sexual orientations with heterosexual hegemony have been given greater visibility and legitimacy, and new ways of relating to sex affectively have emerged initially opposed to traditional romantic discourse, the fundamental pillar of monogamy. The aim of the present work was to study whether these different ways of linking us and understanding affective sex relations marked a significant difference with respect to the heterosexual monogamous hegemonic model in the assumption of the mythified ideas of romantic love. Therefore, we studied the relationship between sex, sexual orientation, and the type of sex-affective relationship (monogamous or non-monogamous by consensus) in the assumption of the myths of romantic love. For this purpose, an instrument that showed appropriate psychometric properties was created, and a cross-sectional study was carried out with a sample of 1,235 people who completed a self-administered online questionnaire. The results indicated that there were no significant differences according to sex, but there were differences in sexual orientation and type of relationship. It may be concluded that a person, regardless of sex, heterosexual or homosexual, monogamous or who has never had affective sex relations, will have a significantly greater probability of assuming the myths of romantic love than a person with a sexual orientation other than heterosexual or homosexual and who is in a non-monogamous consensual relationship.
Title: Assumption of the Myths of Romantic Love: Its Relationship With Sex, Type of Sex-Affective Relationship, and Sexual Orientation
Description:
Romantic love promotes and lays the foundation for the development of hegemonic affective sex relationships, guiding the normative ways of feeling and experiencing love.
This way of conceiving love is an intrinsic part of women's subordination, and it entails a greater tolerance for situations of violence in sex-affective relationships in which the exercise of asymmetric power relations between men and women is legitimized.
With the current advent of the postmodern stage, a wide variety of dissident (non-heterosexual) sexual orientations with heterosexual hegemony have been given greater visibility and legitimacy, and new ways of relating to sex affectively have emerged initially opposed to traditional romantic discourse, the fundamental pillar of monogamy.
The aim of the present work was to study whether these different ways of linking us and understanding affective sex relations marked a significant difference with respect to the heterosexual monogamous hegemonic model in the assumption of the mythified ideas of romantic love.
Therefore, we studied the relationship between sex, sexual orientation, and the type of sex-affective relationship (monogamous or non-monogamous by consensus) in the assumption of the myths of romantic love.
For this purpose, an instrument that showed appropriate psychometric properties was created, and a cross-sectional study was carried out with a sample of 1,235 people who completed a self-administered online questionnaire.
The results indicated that there were no significant differences according to sex, but there were differences in sexual orientation and type of relationship.
It may be concluded that a person, regardless of sex, heterosexual or homosexual, monogamous or who has never had affective sex relations, will have a significantly greater probability of assuming the myths of romantic love than a person with a sexual orientation other than heterosexual or homosexual and who is in a non-monogamous consensual relationship.

Related Results

Sex differences in romantic love: an evolutionary perspective
Sex differences in romantic love: an evolutionary perspective
Abstract Background Evolutionary selection pressures, most notably sexual selection, have created (and continue to sustai...
Introducing ‘Intimate Civility’: Towards a New Concept for 21st-Century Relationships
Introducing ‘Intimate Civility’: Towards a New Concept for 21st-Century Relationships
Fig. 1: Photo by Miguel Orós, from unsplash.comFeminism has stalled at the bedroom door. In the post-#metoo era, more than ever, we need intimate civil rights in our relationships ...
A Maltese Perspective of Sex: a Maltese cross-sectional study
A Maltese Perspective of Sex: a Maltese cross-sectional study
Abstract Background This research constitutes a pioneering cross-sectional investigation into sexual behaviors within the Maltes...
Martin Luther and Love
Martin Luther and Love
Abstract The questions of love’s nature and its different forms were crucial to Martin Luther from the beginning of his theological career. Already as a young mon...
(373) Sexual Health Literacy Confidence Among Urology Resident Physicians
(373) Sexual Health Literacy Confidence Among Urology Resident Physicians
Abstract Introduction Despite the importance of sexual health, physicians may not be adequately equipped to diagnose and treat s...
(059) Comfort With Sexual Health Literacy Assessed in Urology Resident Physicians
(059) Comfort With Sexual Health Literacy Assessed in Urology Resident Physicians
Abstract Introduction Despite the importance of sexual health, physicians may not be adequately equipped to diagnose and treat s...
Love
Love
The development of relationship science is integral to the development of positive psychology. The scientific study of love is of central importance to relationship science and is,...

Back to Top