Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The principle ne bis in idem and public prosecutor's decisions
View through CrossRef
The prohibition of being liable to be tried or punished again in criminal proceedings for the same offence ne bis in idem - is one of fundamental criminal proceeding principles and a basic human right. It protects the defendant from reopening the proceedings for the same criminal offence in respect of which the proceedings were finalized. Primarily, the effect of this principle is related to final court decisions. Regarding the decisions of the public prosecutor, there is a legal gap. As the reformed criminal procedure provides broader jurisdiction to the public prosecutor, it has seemed a necessity to consider in this paper what status is given in practice to the decisions of this procedural entity regarding the prohibition of ne bis in idem. During the review, the views of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union are presented, which plays a key role in defining the principles and setting standards for the application of the principle, as well as domestic case-law. The author believes that a broader interpretation should be accepted so that the effect of the ne bis in idem principle is not limited only to court decisions but also to include the decisions of the public prosecutor. In this way complete legal certainty is achieved and uncertain legal situations are eliminated.
Title: The principle ne bis in idem and public prosecutor's decisions
Description:
The prohibition of being liable to be tried or punished again in criminal proceedings for the same offence ne bis in idem - is one of fundamental criminal proceeding principles and a basic human right.
It protects the defendant from reopening the proceedings for the same criminal offence in respect of which the proceedings were finalized.
Primarily, the effect of this principle is related to final court decisions.
Regarding the decisions of the public prosecutor, there is a legal gap.
As the reformed criminal procedure provides broader jurisdiction to the public prosecutor, it has seemed a necessity to consider in this paper what status is given in practice to the decisions of this procedural entity regarding the prohibition of ne bis in idem.
During the review, the views of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union are presented, which plays a key role in defining the principles and setting standards for the application of the principle, as well as domestic case-law.
The author believes that a broader interpretation should be accepted so that the effect of the ne bis in idem principle is not limited only to court decisions but also to include the decisions of the public prosecutor.
In this way complete legal certainty is achieved and uncertain legal situations are eliminated.
Related Results
Principles of organization and activity of the European Prosecutor’s Office
Principles of organization and activity of the European Prosecutor’s Office
The article is devoted to the research of the principles of organization and activity of the European Prosecutor’s Office. The activities of the European Prosecutor’s Office are ba...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
The Prosecutor’s Evolution
The Prosecutor’s Evolution
Abstract
It is axiomatic that American prosecutors possess significant discretion. What varies among prosecutors is how they use their discretion. How they use their...
IMPLEMENTASI KEADILAN RESTORATIF TERHADAP PENYELESAIAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DALAM LINGKUP KELUARGA DI KEJAKSAAN
IMPLEMENTASI KEADILAN RESTORATIF TERHADAP PENYELESAIAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DALAM LINGKUP KELUARGA DI KEJAKSAAN
This study aims to investigate the implementation of Restorative Justice in accordance with the Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia's Prosecutor's Office Number 15 of 2020 conc...
Versuche zur Synthese 2.2′-disubstituierter cis-Bis(phenyl)bis(triphenylphosphan)platin(II)-Verbindungen und Kristallstruktur des cis-Bis(2-nitrophenyl)bis(triphenylphosphan)platin(II) / On the Formation of 2,2′-Disubstituted cis-Bis-(phenyl)bis(triphenyl
Versuche zur Synthese 2.2′-disubstituierter cis-Bis(phenyl)bis(triphenylphosphan)platin(II)-Verbindungen und Kristallstruktur des cis-Bis(2-nitrophenyl)bis(triphenylphosphan)platin(II) / On the Formation of 2,2′-Disubstituted cis-Bis-(phenyl)bis(triphenyl
Syntheses of 2,2′-disubstituted cis-Bis(phenyl)bis(ligand)platinum(II) compounds are described with respect to the influence of the ortho-substituents on reaction paths. Configurat...
WINNING AT ALL COSTS TOO COSTLY S v Rozani; Rozani v Director of Public Prosecutions, Western Cape 2009 1 SACR 540 (C)
WINNING AT ALL COSTS TOO COSTLY S v Rozani; Rozani v Director of Public Prosecutions, Western Cape 2009 1 SACR 540 (C)
The role of the public prosecutor is one to be respected. Members of society expect to enjoy lives free of violence, theft and other criminal violation; in return, they surrender t...
PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE POLICE, PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, AND COURT
PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE POLICE, PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, AND COURT
Abstrak.
Background. The procedures and mechanisms of the criminal justice system regarding examination during the investigation and prosecution phases are conducted by the polic...
A razoabilidade da majoração da pena em decorrência da reincidência frente ao princípio non bis in idem
A razoabilidade da majoração da pena em decorrência da reincidência frente ao princípio non bis in idem
A proibição da dupla incriminação de acordo com o princípio non bis in idem não tem previsão expressa no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro, mas não deixa de se fazer presente nas nor...

