Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The importance of early phonics improvements for predicting later reading comprehension

View through CrossRef
The role of phonics instruction in early reading development has been the subject of significant conjecture. Recently, England implemented a phonics screening check to assess the phonetic decoding of 6‐year‐old students, to ensure that all students master this foundational literacy skill and attain adequate phonemic awareness in the early years of primary schooling. Students who fail this check are obliged to retake the assessment the following year. In this article, we compare the performance of students who initially pass this check (pass) and students who fail the original assessment but pass the retaken assessment (fail–pass), with students who fail both the original and retaken assessments (fail–fail). Using data from the Key Stage 1 assessment of reading and the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS), we examined the reading comprehension performance of these students approximately 1 and 4 years after their first phonics screening. The results suggested that fail–pass students performed substantially better than fail–fail students, even after performance on the initial phonics check was controlled for. While fail–pass students do not appear to entirely catch up with pass students in reading comprehension, their relatively better performance underscores the importance of intervening for those students who are identified as having problems with phonetic decoding to increase their likelihood of success at reading comprehension in later schooling.
Title: The importance of early phonics improvements for predicting later reading comprehension
Description:
The role of phonics instruction in early reading development has been the subject of significant conjecture.
Recently, England implemented a phonics screening check to assess the phonetic decoding of 6‐year‐old students, to ensure that all students master this foundational literacy skill and attain adequate phonemic awareness in the early years of primary schooling.
Students who fail this check are obliged to retake the assessment the following year.
In this article, we compare the performance of students who initially pass this check (pass) and students who fail the original assessment but pass the retaken assessment (fail–pass), with students who fail both the original and retaken assessments (fail–fail).
Using data from the Key Stage 1 assessment of reading and the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS), we examined the reading comprehension performance of these students approximately 1 and 4 years after their first phonics screening.
The results suggested that fail–pass students performed substantially better than fail–fail students, even after performance on the initial phonics check was controlled for.
While fail–pass students do not appear to entirely catch up with pass students in reading comprehension, their relatively better performance underscores the importance of intervening for those students who are identified as having problems with phonetic decoding to increase their likelihood of success at reading comprehension in later schooling.

Related Results

THE ROLE OF ICT IN TEACHING ENGLISH LANGUAGE PHONICS
THE ROLE OF ICT IN TEACHING ENGLISH LANGUAGE PHONICS
Teaching of English language phonics is becoming one of the most challenging task in our society where knowledge of the phonics is expanding and changing rapidly and modern technol...
The Effect of Tea Party Strategy toward Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text
The Effect of Tea Party Strategy toward Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text
n teaching reading, teaching technique and reading interest influence student’s reading comprehension. Tea Party strategy requires students to access background knowledge or review...
Incidental Collocation Learning from Different Modes of Input and Factors That Affect Learning
Incidental Collocation Learning from Different Modes of Input and Factors That Affect Learning
Collocations, i.e., words that habitually co-occur in texts (e.g., strong coffee, heavy smoker), are ubiquitous in language and thus crucial for second/foreign language (L2) learne...
Whole Language Method or Phonics Method for Better Reading? An Eye-tracking Study
Whole Language Method or Phonics Method for Better Reading? An Eye-tracking Study
This study aims to compare the reading skills of individuals who learned reading through the Phonics Method (PM) and those who learned reading through the Whole Language Method (WL...
Using of Morphological Theory to Improve English Reading Comprehension Ability of Buriram Rajabhat University Students
Using of Morphological Theory to Improve English Reading Comprehension Ability of Buriram Rajabhat University Students
This study aimed to 1) explore the English reading comprehension problems and needs of Buriram Rajabhat University students, 2) construct the English reading comprehension handbook...
The Effect of Teaching Strategies and Students’ Motivation on Students’ Narrative Writing Achievement
The Effect of Teaching Strategies and Students’ Motivation on Students’ Narrative Writing Achievement
The objectives of this study were to investigate whether: (1) Students’ achievement in reading comprehension taught by using SPE is higher than students’ Achievement in Reading com...
The Effect of Teaching Strategies and Students’ Motivation on Students’ Narrative Writing Achievement
The Effect of Teaching Strategies and Students’ Motivation on Students’ Narrative Writing Achievement
The objectives of this study were to investigate whether: (1) Students’ achievement in reading comprehension taught by using SPE is higher than students’ Achievement in Reading com...
Reading comprehension of ambiguous sentences by school‐age children with autism spectrum disorder
Reading comprehension of ambiguous sentences by school‐age children with autism spectrum disorder
Weak central coherence (processing details over gist), poor oral language abilities, poor suppression, semantic interference, and poor comprehension monitoring have all been implic...

Back to Top