Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Truth, the Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth: The Truth of Who Is to Blame

View through CrossRef
Chapter 10 draws out some fundamental themes in the book and points to the limitations of the current criminal justice system not only in terms of establishing truth but in terms of realising significant social benefit. Three areas of focus are taken to assess the current system’s ability to find the truth: blame, juvenile justice, and the pursuit of justice. The current criminal process adopts a person, rather than a system, approach to bad events with a focus on identifying individuals to blame rather than addressing the wider problems resulting from crime. Juvenile justice perhaps highlights many aspects of the relationship between truth and criminal justice in general. The chapter concludes by the extent to which the current system’s preoccupation with a narrow historical truth undermines the wider pursuit of justice for all. The pursuit of truth is used as a means of identifying those deserving of punishment, even though the many harms of punishment are as well-documented as the limited effect punishment has in reducing crime. Society must resist the default position that current criminal justice paradigms are optimal either in terms of truth-finding or in terms of responding to criminal harm.
Title: The Truth, the Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth: The Truth of Who Is to Blame
Description:
Chapter 10 draws out some fundamental themes in the book and points to the limitations of the current criminal justice system not only in terms of establishing truth but in terms of realising significant social benefit.
Three areas of focus are taken to assess the current system’s ability to find the truth: blame, juvenile justice, and the pursuit of justice.
The current criminal process adopts a person, rather than a system, approach to bad events with a focus on identifying individuals to blame rather than addressing the wider problems resulting from crime.
Juvenile justice perhaps highlights many aspects of the relationship between truth and criminal justice in general.
The chapter concludes by the extent to which the current system’s preoccupation with a narrow historical truth undermines the wider pursuit of justice for all.
The pursuit of truth is used as a means of identifying those deserving of punishment, even though the many harms of punishment are as well-documented as the limited effect punishment has in reducing crime.
Society must resist the default position that current criminal justice paradigms are optimal either in terms of truth-finding or in terms of responding to criminal harm.

Related Results

Basic Blame and Basic Praise
Basic Blame and Basic Praise
Abstract This chapter defends an account of what the blameworthy and praiseworthy are worthy of: basic blame and basic praise. Given the wide variety of responses th...
People Systematically Update Moral Judgments of Blame
People Systematically Update Moral Judgments of Blame
Six experiments examine people's updating of blame judgments and test predictions developed from a socially-regulated blame perspective. According to this perspective, blame emerge...
Pragmatics of Political Blame in British and Iraqi Parliaments
Pragmatics of Political Blame in British and Iraqi Parliaments
This research is a pragmatic study of political blame in British and Iraqi Parliaments. It aims to unfold the similarities and/or differences in terms of the pragmatic and pragma-r...
Subjunctive Hypocrisy
Subjunctive Hypocrisy
It is commonly thought that agents lack the standing to blame in cases where their blame would be hypocritical. Jack for instance, would seem to lack the standing to blame Gerald f...
The Blame Game: War and Violence in Dilruba Z. Ara’s <I>Blame</I>
The Blame Game: War and Violence in Dilruba Z. Ara’s <I>Blame</I>
Contemporary studies pertaining to the 1971 Liberation War of Bangladesh by South Asian women writers have ignited reinvestigation into the intensity of violence, rape and attribut...
Scepticism about epistemic blame
Scepticism about epistemic blame
AbstractI advocate scepticism about epistemic blame; the view that we have good reason to think there is no distinctively epistemic form of blame. Epistemologists often find it use...
Blame Attribution, Partisanship, and Federalism: Evidence from a Panel Survey
Blame Attribution, Partisanship, and Federalism: Evidence from a Panel Survey
Abstract When disaster strikes in federal systems, who do citizens blame and why? Partisan blame attribution (PBA) suggests that Republicans and Democrats hold co...
In Praise of Blame
In Praise of Blame
AbstractThis final chapter develops an account of blameworthiness that dovetails with the previous chapter’s account of blame. Because the core constituents of blame consist of a d...

Back to Top