Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Truth, the Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth: The Truth of Who Is to Blame

View through CrossRef
Chapter 10 draws out some fundamental themes in the book and points to the limitations of the current criminal justice system not only in terms of establishing truth but in terms of realising significant social benefit. Three areas of focus are taken to assess the current system’s ability to find the truth: blame, juvenile justice, and the pursuit of justice. The current criminal process adopts a person, rather than a system, approach to bad events with a focus on identifying individuals to blame rather than addressing the wider problems resulting from crime. Juvenile justice perhaps highlights many aspects of the relationship between truth and criminal justice in general. The chapter concludes by the extent to which the current system’s preoccupation with a narrow historical truth undermines the wider pursuit of justice for all. The pursuit of truth is used as a means of identifying those deserving of punishment, even though the many harms of punishment are as well-documented as the limited effect punishment has in reducing crime. Society must resist the default position that current criminal justice paradigms are optimal either in terms of truth-finding or in terms of responding to criminal harm.
Title: The Truth, the Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth: The Truth of Who Is to Blame
Description:
Chapter 10 draws out some fundamental themes in the book and points to the limitations of the current criminal justice system not only in terms of establishing truth but in terms of realising significant social benefit.
Three areas of focus are taken to assess the current system’s ability to find the truth: blame, juvenile justice, and the pursuit of justice.
The current criminal process adopts a person, rather than a system, approach to bad events with a focus on identifying individuals to blame rather than addressing the wider problems resulting from crime.
Juvenile justice perhaps highlights many aspects of the relationship between truth and criminal justice in general.
The chapter concludes by the extent to which the current system’s preoccupation with a narrow historical truth undermines the wider pursuit of justice for all.
The pursuit of truth is used as a means of identifying those deserving of punishment, even though the many harms of punishment are as well-documented as the limited effect punishment has in reducing crime.
Society must resist the default position that current criminal justice paradigms are optimal either in terms of truth-finding or in terms of responding to criminal harm.

Related Results

Basic Blame and Basic Praise
Basic Blame and Basic Praise
Abstract This chapter defends an account of what the blameworthy and praiseworthy are worthy of: basic blame and basic praise. Given the wide variety of responses th...
People Systematically Update Moral Judgments of Blame
People Systematically Update Moral Judgments of Blame
Six experiments examine people's updating of blame judgments and test predictions developed from a socially-regulated blame perspective. According to this perspective, blame emerge...
Pragmatics of Political Blame in British and Iraqi Parliaments
Pragmatics of Political Blame in British and Iraqi Parliaments
This research is a pragmatic study of political blame in British and Iraqi Parliaments. It aims to unfold the similarities and/or differences in terms of the pragmatic and pragma-r...
In Praise of Blame
In Praise of Blame
AbstractThis final chapter develops an account of blameworthiness that dovetails with the previous chapter’s account of blame. Because the core constituents of blame consist of a d...
Anatomi dan Literasi Post-Truth
Anatomi dan Literasi Post-Truth
Abstract. Post-truth has become a jargon in conversation and discussion. The concept of the theory is complex and becomes a challenge in itself to ground it in the general public. ...
Absolved from the Neoliberal Burden of Responsibility: The Effect of Populist Victim Rhetoric on Leader Support
Absolved from the Neoliberal Burden of Responsibility: The Effect of Populist Victim Rhetoric on Leader Support
A common explanation for the success of populists is that they rhetorically shift blame for their followers’ hardships toward ‘elites’, therefore creating a culpable outgroup. Howe...
Morality and ethics
Morality and ethics
Morality is a distinct sphere within the domain of normative thinking about action and feeling (see Normativity); the whole domain, however, is the subject of ethics. How ...

Back to Top