Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Death Penalty: An International View

View through CrossRef
Abstract: This research explores the use and non‐use of capital punishment in various regions of the world. This is a descriptive analysis of the ultimate penal policy that any nation can give in its operation and administration of justice. In 1965 Patrick published his research on the death penalty. He found 86.6% of the nations he studied retained the death penalty. Amnesty International found 84.6% for 1985. The two figures are very close even though they are over 20 years apart. The research briefly explores the increases in the death row population in the United States (over 2,000 since 1967). Great Britain tried to reinstate the death penalty to solve its ‘terrorist problem’ in 1987. Spain executes by a ‘garrote’. The Soviet Union and some other Soviet aligned nations retain the penalty for the economic crimes of: counterfeiting, speculation in currency, stealing state property, and taking bribes by an official. France abolished the death penalty and the guillotine in 1971. They tried to reinstate the penalty in 1976 to deal with ‘major drug crimes’. Australia eliminated the penalty in 1985 when its Western region finally abolished it. South Africa did execute an average of 111 per year for the years 1980 to 1985. Japan retains the penalty for 17 crimes. Malaysia has recently executed several people for drug offences and arms violations. In Latin America, one‐half of the nations retain the penalty. The article concludes with recent events surrounding World War II Nazi Criminals recently sentenced to death in Israel and Russia.
Title: The Death Penalty: An International View
Description:
Abstract: This research explores the use and non‐use of capital punishment in various regions of the world.
This is a descriptive analysis of the ultimate penal policy that any nation can give in its operation and administration of justice.
In 1965 Patrick published his research on the death penalty.
He found 86.
6% of the nations he studied retained the death penalty.
Amnesty International found 84.
6% for 1985.
The two figures are very close even though they are over 20 years apart.
The research briefly explores the increases in the death row population in the United States (over 2,000 since 1967).
Great Britain tried to reinstate the death penalty to solve its ‘terrorist problem’ in 1987.
Spain executes by a ‘garrote’.
The Soviet Union and some other Soviet aligned nations retain the penalty for the economic crimes of: counterfeiting, speculation in currency, stealing state property, and taking bribes by an official.
France abolished the death penalty and the guillotine in 1971.
They tried to reinstate the penalty in 1976 to deal with ‘major drug crimes’.
Australia eliminated the penalty in 1985 when its Western region finally abolished it.
South Africa did execute an average of 111 per year for the years 1980 to 1985.
Japan retains the penalty for 17 crimes.
Malaysia has recently executed several people for drug offences and arms violations.
In Latin America, one‐half of the nations retain the penalty.
The article concludes with recent events surrounding World War II Nazi Criminals recently sentenced to death in Israel and Russia.

Related Results

The Urgency Of Imposing The Death Penalty On Drug Dealers From A Human Rights Perspective
The Urgency Of Imposing The Death Penalty On Drug Dealers From A Human Rights Perspective
This study uses a normative legal research method. Normative legal research is examining law from an internal perspective with the object of research being legal norms. This study ...
Constitutionality or Otherwise of Death Penalty Enforcement in Nigeria
Constitutionality or Otherwise of Death Penalty Enforcement in Nigeria
This paper appraises the constitutionality of death penalty enforcement in Nigeria. The six common methods of enforcing death penalty are reviewed while highlighting the tortuous a...
Penghapusan Hukuman Mati di Indonesia Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Hukum Pidana Islam
Penghapusan Hukuman Mati di Indonesia Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Hukum Pidana Islam
The provisions on the application of the death penalty are still a polemic, one of which is Imparsial NGO which is against the implementation of the death penalty in Indonesia. Bas...
The death penalty and society in contemporary China
The death penalty and society in contemporary China
Why are death penalty provisions, convictions and executions so prevalent in China? This article aims to answer this question by way of defining China as a 'state power' based soci...
An Analysis of the Death Penalty in Indonesia Criminal Law
An Analysis of the Death Penalty in Indonesia Criminal Law
This research uses normative juridical approach to study on the analysis of the death penalty executions and the legal policy of death executions in Indonesia. There are delays on ...
A Reappraisal of Death Penalty in Nigeria
A Reappraisal of Death Penalty in Nigeria
It is true that the law is an instrument of social control. The discourse on the use of the death penalty as a penal sanction for offences is often clouded with contention. Over th...
Comparative Legal Analysis of the Death Penalty Law
Comparative Legal Analysis of the Death Penalty Law
This research aims to analyze the regulation of criminal offenses punishable by the death penalty and compare the formulation of the death penalty between the Penal Code under Law ...
Does the Marriage Tax Differential Influence Same‐Sex Couples' Marriage Decisions?
Does the Marriage Tax Differential Influence Same‐Sex Couples' Marriage Decisions?
AbstractObjectiveThis article evaluates whether the federal marriage tax penalty (penalty) or federal marriage bonus (bonus) affects the marriage decisions of same‐sex couples (SSC...

Back to Top